Frage von dude909:Hello,
wants me in the near future a new camcorder growth.
Presently, the Panasonic AG-DVX100BE and the Sonyhdr-FX7E.
the question is, is it worth an HD Camera to buy synonymous if the video just as a normal dvd and would not produce as
blu-ray.
Is the picture quality then synonymous with a standard-def. Video better if it is with an HD camera (eg FX7) rather than an SD camera was filmed, in which case DVX100BE?
I hope you can help me there and thank you in advance for
Antwort von wolfgang:
The material of an HDV device is synonymous with SD better - if the down conversion to SD is done according to quality. This is more of a sticking point.
Antwort von LM100:
Stand facing the same issue. HD or SD-Cam-Cam?
Buy this year, probably still a HD Television and synonymous we have a PlayStation 3 with Blue Ray. So speaks a lot for HD.
But now seems to me the whole history of HD camcorders with the ETAS still "complicated". This is how I see the question as to whether I am right at this moment an HD camcorder to buy, or rather once again to buy a SD and then 2 years to HD transfers.
What you hear is the postprocessing of HD still extremely complicated and makes high demands s.den Calculator. Is this really sooo difficult? Edit my videos so far with VS10 us it is really me now already expensive enough.
Looking s.PC synonymous actually a difference between HD and SD?
Look my videos actually mostly s.PC.
What would you advise me? Now in HD or SD a good camcorder to buy (Panasonic GS320?) And in 2 years to change?
Lothar
Antwort von Videophreak:
Hello "dude909"
it is an HD Camera to buy synonymous if the video just as a normal dvd and would not produce a blu-ray.
So, if you have the intention to SD PAL to stay, then I imagine it would with the HD-Cam again just superior. Because if you put your videos, you with an HD-Cam machst additionally runterkonvertieren have, then this is a step more. How good in the end for the quality, you can probably just a test lab to say, your eyes are in PAL resolution, but hardly see a difference. An HD-Cam is now designed for HD, and if they are synonymous SD recording offers, you must not say that the picture quality for SD would be better than a camera, only the beginning of the SD is designed for. And if you with the DVX100BE liebäugelst to afterwards synonymous with SD to stay, then I would rather you like to recommend Panasonic, although I an advocate of Sonybin. * g *
If you, however, but a back door open like, possibly even later switch to HD, then you should, no preference whether Sony or Canon or Panasonic, access to a camera that you like both the quality levels offered. I myself have a strong interest s.einer Panasonic, both synonymous with SD than in HD delivers beautiful images. And the reason, because I would like to film in HD, I look at the whole environment (PC potent, Blue-Ray burner, FullHD screen etc. ..) but not with a stroke can afford. So I buy myself time a test of me and for my taste for good camera, with which I when I look at the rest of peripherals with the time to buy yet synonymous beautiful video in SD format can do. And the Panasonic SX5 of is whether the Unkrufe other, a really good device, which is synonymous sometimes very well equipped. The only thing it lacks is a focus ring. But there is in this price range anyway for None HD Camera.
I hope you can help me there and thank you in advance for As I said, if you are sure that you're in SD PAL want to stay, no preference as to the entertainment industry in the next 5-6 years, then I would personally draw Panasonic. The money that you in the FX7 to invest would s.falschen place. Because I would instead DVX100BE some optional equipment such as Microphone (+ windshields), a really good tripod, a few filters intentions, a small rear-camera remote control and maybe even a little Steadycam system to spendier. Because with such an equipment then you have much more fun than if you "only" a buy HD-Cam, for which you may be one or the other optional things just do not buy because of the financial framework is exhausted anyway . HD Video forgives so much less error while filming themselves .. And while cutting costs is already far more than if you have a SD PAL video in AVI cut.
Lg
Markus
Antwort von dhendrik:
hey leute ...
So I have an HD Cam ... but unfortunately not the experience with the whole Schnittprogz as CS3 and Avid etc. edit my videos with the CyberLink PowerProducer 6 Pros .... There must say good features synonymous with the prog ... but unfortunately the DVD is s.ende qualified yet so true ...
Up next, the wolfgang said that you just do the conversion properly must! I can say with a prog which I can make it good for?
I feel it is a question that I not attend a course must .... for example athoring dvd menu and sowas ....
regards
hendrik