Frage von Ralf Fontana:
Also available are a fairly powerful PC (Athlon
64/3200, 1 GB) and an HDTV-capable Sagem 120cm Rückpro TV.
How come now the HD video from PC to your TV? My Radeon 9600Pro wirds
probably not get the next model, I already know
which I must respect.
--
The Macintosh was mausbedienbar, when a PC user to the call
"Can you ever open a second window?" even with "No, not at minus 15 degrees!" replied.
(Wolf-Dieter Roth in Telepolis)
Antwort von Andreas Dau:
Ralf Fontana:
> There are a fairly powerful PC (Athlon
> 64/3200, 1 GB) and an HDTV-capable Sagem 120cm Rückpro TV.
>
> How come the HD video from PC to your TV? My Radeon 9600Pro wirds
> Probably not get the next model, I already know
> Which I must respect.
Hm, what have I finally bury in a new Daddelkarte
read? The GeForce 6600GT sometimes appear on a "HDTV-output"
to have, whatever that might be synonymous.
I'm very naive when I consider that one for HDTV
simply a higher bandwidth for the signal is good and needs?
cu,
ada
--
EIRIS sazun idisi | suma clubodun
sazun hera duoder. | umbi cuoniouuidi:
suma heptidun haptens, | insprinc haptbandun,
suma heri lezidun, | inuar uigandun.
Antwort von Ralf Fontana:
Uwe Schuster wrote:
>> How come the HD video from PC to your TV? My Radeon 9600Pro wirds
>> probably not get the next model, I already know
>> what I must respect.
> First of all important to know if the type of HDTV-capable input
> On TV,
In addition to HDMI, I have found everything. Scart, S-Video, component, DVI,
VGA.
> most likely will look at the playback on YUV
> possible. It could still synonymous RGB or digital via DVI (with
> Tubing, but less likely).
Is a DLP rear projection TV.
> Option 1 which I stopped, would be a newly published or
> appearing streaming HD-capable clients to use.
Since I do not belong to the target.
> Option 2 would have a special graphics card or TV card with
> HDTV-compatible YUV output, instead of the usual TV-Composite.
Something like I would like.
> White but not whether something is already there.
So fast, I want my Radeon does not dispose.
> Option 3 would be the normal VGA output of a normal graphics card.
That would be my favorite. Only I use the DVI and VGA inputs do not
much confidence.
> There should a suitable (higher bandwidth) RGB-YUV converter standard ran.
Seems to be no confidence in. My wallet would be with
Unfortunately, the quality of the image probably synonymous.
> My reports I have experience but not for everything, therefore, rather
> theory.
Well, it's Christmas in a transport session (PC) with
subsequent test.
@ All: Where there are adequate data to download? Test pictures,
Move sequences, etc.
--
The Macintosh was mausbedienbar, when a PC user to the call
"Can you ever open a second window?" even with "No, not at minus 15 degrees!" replied.
(Wolf-Dieter Roth in Telepolis)
Antwort von Ralf Fontana:
Uwe Schuster wrote:
>> In addition to HDMI, I have found everything. Scart, S-Video, component, DVI,
>> VGA.
> That sounds quite bad and do not extend your
> Possibilities.
> Now you have only via manual clarify which of these inputs synonymous
> HD signals can process.
Manual has einenen RAF (retired acceptance factor) of 1.0
Technical data because I have not yet found.
> S-video separates in any case ever made.
sik.
> The most interesting for you anyway but are then either
> playback via analog VGA (RGB) or digital via DVI-D or DVI-I.
DVI-A is absent.
> 1 Simply clasp the VGA output of the graphics card directly to the
> VGA input on the RüPro.
> Then the Resolutionund the frame according to the PC
> Setting. Resolutionam best at the native Resolutiondes DLP chips
> on TV, maybe the trial & error. Refresh rate for smooth
> (shutterfree) Playback of PAL and NTSC material to 50 or 60 Hz
> Setting.
> Where additional help Programs like Powerstrip.
Will I get me.
>> Only the DVI-I and VGA inputs do not
>> a lot of confidence.
> Why not?
When reading the test reports in ct somehow has the impression
set the guys build the TVs of PCs have much idea
like an elephant fly from.
>> @ All: Where there are adequate data to download? Test pictures,
>> Moves sequences, etc.
> In MS, there are what, Bzgl WMV9. Otherwise hift Google.
This helps google I ever heard. Just thought maybe
anyone notice a little more concrete can provide. 1 GB download
then to the waste material is - it must not be.
--
The Macintosh was mausbedienbar, when a PC user to the call
"Can you ever open a second window?" even with "No, not at minus 15 degrees!" replied.
(Wolf-Dieter Roth in Telepolis)
