Frage von Guido Ruppe:
Hello!
I have a few more than 3 GB of MPG2 files for DVD. Sun on DVD
burned plays my stand-alone DVD player is synonymous with no
DVD structure, but only if they are not larger than 1 GB.
Which program for WinXP, I could cut the parts without
new term and lossless coding?
Regards, Guido
Antwort von Christian Potzinger:
Guido has geschreibselt Ruppe:
> Which program to WinXP, I could go into the parts
> Cut and losses without being liable to encode?
Programs to cut, there are many. I use this
TMPGEnc. Kannst ja but synonymous to http://www.doom9.org
looking for alternatives. HTH.
--
ryl: GKar
Antwort von Andre Storch:
> Guido wrote Ruppe
> Hello!
>
> I have a few more than 3 GB of files to MPG2
> DVD. How to play the DVD my stand-alone
> DVD Player while synonymous without DVD structure, but only
> If they are not larger than 1 GB.
>
> Which program to WinXP, I could go into the parts
> Cut and losses without being liable to encode?
www.videoredo.com
(30-day unlimited trial version, then money :-))
Regards
André
Antwort von Guido Ruppe:
Christian Potzinger wrote s.05.01.2006 14:05:
> Programs to cut, there are many. I use this
> TMPGEnc.
that would not be bad, but English and scheiss-complicated! Is there
something like AIV-edit for MPG2?
Guido
Antwort von Christian Potzinger:
Guido has geschreibselt Ruppe:
>> TMPGEnc.
>
> That would not be bad, but English and scheiss-complicated!
> Is there something like AIV-edit for MPG2?
Sowas notice after years of use to no more;)
Back to the question: No idea, unfortunately. What is rarely
to cut and that's enough for me TMPGEnc. Do you have indicated on
Found no link tool?
--
ryl: GKar
Antwort von Norbert Müller:
Guido Ruppe wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a few more than 3 GB of MPG2 files for DVD. How to
> DVD plays my stand-alone DVD player is synonymous with no
> DVD-structure, but only if they are not larger than 1 GB.
>
> Which program for WinXP, I could cut in parts
> Without being liable for loss and encoding?
DVDFab. Since there or is there still a freeware version.
Greetings, Norbert
Antwort von Detlef Wirsing:
Guido Ruppe wrote:
[...]
> Which program for WinXP, I could cut the parts without
> New lossless and liable to encode?
With any authoring program that you like the raw material
into a DVD video converting. Focal points are the basic concepts
FAQ of the group and as www.lucike.de.
Yours sincerely,
Detlef
Antwort von Guido Ruppe:
Detlef Wirsing s.05.01.2006 19:54 wrote:
> Www.lucike.de.
Wow, very informative! What you earn with advertising? :-|
Guido
Antwort von Alfred Slotosch:
Guido Ruppe wrote:
> Detlef Wirsing s.05.01.2006 19:54 wrote:
>
>> Www.lucike.de.
>
>
> Wow, very informative! What you earn with advertising? :-|
>
Tip of the MPEG2 with an authoring program to split is ok,
but www.lucike.de is crap. Through my spam blocker comes of it
nothing more. Seems only from advertising to exist.
Alfred
Antwort von Detlef Wirsing:
Alfred Slotosch s.Donnerstag wrote:
> Guido Ruppe wrote:
>> Detlef Wirsing s.05.01.2006 19:54 wrote:
>>
>>> Www.lucike.de.
>>
>>
>> Wow, very informative! What you earn with advertising? :-|
>>
>
> The tip to MPEG2 with an authoring program to split is ok,
> But www.lucike.de is crap. Through my spam blocker comes of it
> Nothing more. Seems only from advertising to exist.
I have the website will not be trimmed. I pushed it
more helpful by direct links. If too much advertising in it,
can be synonymous http://german.doom9.org visit.
Yours sincerely,
Detlef
Antwort von Hans Kirchmeyr:
Guido Ruppe wrote:
> Which program for WinXP, I could cut the parts without
> New lossless and liable to encode?
Look at ev synonymous at times http://www.mdienert.de/mpeg2schnitt/
hans
Antwort von Detlef Wirsing:
Hans Kirchmeyr wrote p.7. January:
[...]
> Look at ev synonymous at times http://www.mdienert.de/mpeg2schnitt/
Cuts not s.jedem arbitrary frame and therefore lags Cuttermaran
behind. At least it was as if I am approximately 1 year before testing
did.
Yours sincerely,
Detlef
Antwort von Hans Kirchmeyr:
Detlef Wirsing wrote:
> Hans Kirchmeyr wrote p.7. January:
>
> [...]
>> Look at ev synonymous at times http://www.mdienert.de/mpeg2schnitt/
>
> Cuts are not s.jedem arbitrary frame and therefore lags Cuttermaran
> Behind. At least it was as if I am approximately 1 year before testing
> Did.
Yepp, but as you surely know, this is not a bug but a feature as
it is so - as synonymous of Guido desired - any Neukomprimierung
saves.
hans
Antwort von Detlef Wirsing:
Hans Kirchmeyr wrote:
>>> Look at ev synonymous at times http://www.mdienert.de/mpeg2schnitt/
>>
>> Cuts are not s.jedem arbitrary frame and therefore lags Cuttermaran
>> Behind. At least it was as if I am approximately 1 year before testing
>> Did.
>
> Yepp, but as you surely know, this is not a bug but a feature as
> One way - as synonymous of Guido desired - any Neukomprimierung
> Saves.
I know. But that a single frame is recalculated I
like to purchase if I have to frame can be precisely cut. Is halt
A matter of taste. Maybe he just does not buck, nor a
Encoder to integrate. That would be synonymous understandable.
Yours sincerely,
Detlef
Antwort von Christian Schroeder:
Detlef Wirsing wrote:
> Hans Kirchmeyr wrote p.7. January:
>
> [...]
>
>> Look at ev synonymous at times http://www.mdienert.de/mpeg2schnitt/
>
>
> Cuts are not s.jedem arbitrary frame and therefore lags Cuttermaran
> Behind. At least it was as if I am approximately 1 year before testing
> Did.
Cuttermaran synonymous but not "just so", but only with his plugin.
--
Gruß Chris
We must Sisyphus happy as people imagine!
Antwort von Detlef Wirsing:
Christian Schroeder wrote p.7. January:
[...]
>> Cuts are not s.jedem arbitrary frame and therefore lags Cuttermaran
>> Behind. At least it was as if I am approximately 1 year before testing
>> Did.
>
> Cuttermaran synonymous but not "just so", but only with his plugin.
... but on the same site as freeware upon request
can be downloaded. Incidentally, I would have done so synonymous.
Why should any re-invent the wheel? Also, the muxer is external.
Yours sincerely,
Detlef
Antwort von Dieter.Spiess:
Detlef Wirsing wrote:
>> Cuttermaran synonymous but not "just so", but only with his plugin.
>
>
> ... But at the same site as freeware upon request
> Can be downloaded. Incidentally, I would have done so synonymous.
> Why should any re-invent the wheel? Also, the muxer is external.
I test just Cuttermaran synonymous.
Works well for my claims, I just wonder
why not an external synonymous demuxer was involved.
Is there a particular reason?
--
Greeting
Dieter spit
Mail: mailto: Dieter.Spiess @ t-online.de
Antwort von christoph berndl:
Guido Ruppe wrote:
> Which program for WinXP, I could cut the parts without
> New lossless and liable to encode?
eg AVI / MPEG / ASF / WMV Splitter v4.08
-chris
Antwort von Alfred Slotosch:
Dieter.Spiess wrote:
>
> I just Cuttermaran most synonymous.
> Works well for my claims, I just wonder
> Why not add an external synonymous demuxer was involved.
> Is there a particular reason?
>
Usually, one wants a DVD from the cut material and make as
muxt authoring program itself can also be by then nothing
incorrect settings of the Muxers foul. But you can of course synonymous
with Cuttermaran muxen. Look into actions -> Settings. Since
You can find the Muxer tab. But that does not default Multiplexes
switched on, it is ok. The majority does not.
Alfred
Antwort von Detlef Wirsing:
christoph wrote Berndl p.9. January:
> Guido Ruppe wrote:
>> Which program for WinXP, I could cut the parts without
>> New loss-term and be coded?
>
> Eg AVI / MPEG / ASF / WMV Splitter v4.08
The MPS is responsible for the worst of all programs which I have
tested - and they were not few. The handling is
incredibly complicated, the interface can not be reproduced
set, the preview window has the thumbnail size of an
"Navigation" within the video clips you can not speak. It
Cuttermaran to behave like a scooter to a Mercedes Benz.
That these unsuccessful programming attempt synonymous still 35 USD
be required is a cheek.
Yours sincerely,
Detlef
Antwort von Dieter.Spiess:
Alfred Slotosch wrote:
> Dieter.Spiess wrote:
>> I just Cuttermaran most synonymous.
>> Works well for my claims, I just wonder
>> Why not add an external synonymous demuxer was involved.
>> Is there a particular reason?
Usually, one wants a DVD from the cut material and make as
> Muxt authoring program itself can also be by then nothing
> Incorrect settings Muxers foul. But you can of course synonymous
> With Cuttermaran muxen. Look into actions -> Settings. Since
> You can find the Muxer tab. But that does not default Multiplexes
> Switch is ok. The majority does not.
Because did you misunderstood me:
The Muxen I've probably already found and used synonymous.
I asked myself whether there is a specific reason,
why not exactly _De_muxen involved.
This would be the thing for me to use one (!) Program
reduced.
--
Greeting
Dieter spit
Mail: mailto: Dieter.Spiess @ t-online.de
