Frage von Matthias Berke:
If anyone for a free, yet comfortable
Video copying program studied.
Sceneo Vcopy program (freeware).
http://www.sceneo.tv/index.php
Expected but no EierlegendeWollmilchsau, is still rather on
Top
everything. But is working fine.
Just in case: There is synonymous with a forum and plenty of help.
synonymous times read the note on mpeg2 encoder under
- Sceneo Vcopy: multitalent for free!
http://www.sceneo.tv/modules.php?name%Sections&op%viewarticle&artid=3
Matthias
Antwort von Lars Mueller:
Matthias Berke wrote:
>
> If someone look for a free, yet comfortable
> Video copying program studied.
Everything sounds almost too good: Mpeg2 in best quality ... free?
So I once searched for the hook.
> Read synonymous times the reference to mpeg2 encoder under
> - Sceneo Vcopy: multitalent for free!
> http://www.sceneo.tv/modules.php?name%Sections&op%viewarticle&artid=3
And the hook, or at least a first hook finally found:
Citation ---------------- ---------------
Editor synonymous succeeded dreißigtägige provide a free license to
receive. As an additional service can mpeg2 after the deadline
against expenses (4.99 euros) on www.sceneo.tv indefinitely
be released. ...
------------ End quote ---------------
Ahaaaa! :-)
Gruß Lars
Antwort von Jürgen Hallbauer:
>
> ---------------- --------------- Quote
> Editor synonymous succeeded dreißigtägige provide a free license to
> Receive. As an additional service can mpeg2 after the deadline
> Against expenses (4.99 euros) on www.sceneo.tv indefinitely
> Be released. ...
> ------------ End quote ---------------
>
Nja 4.99 euro if your hooks are not white ...
Hab mir synonymous site views and feel
Now they all want the 2004 Media Center invent, since my TV is 5 years
A PC with TFT Sony18Zoll and WinTV FM PCI is now a few
Weeks, the time has blessed (Monitors), now I look 14Zoll.
I see the concepts not the light at the end of the tunnel.
Free advertising would go even now synonymous with scan per channel logo
Software and everything else is nice to have.
juergen
http://www.ush.de
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Jürgen Bauer Hall wrote:
> I see in the concepts not the light at the end of the tunnel.
> Free advertising would now go even synonymous with scan per channel logo
> Software and everything else is nice to have.
So yes, I do not synonymous, but only with reference to
Copy the video program Sceneo Vcopy.
:-)
Matthias
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Lars Mueller wrote:
> And the hook, or at least a first hook finally found:
>
> ---------------- --------------- Quote
> Editor synonymous succeeded dreißigtägige provide a free license to
> Receive. As an additional service can mpeg2 after the deadline
> Against expenses (4.99 euros) on www.sceneo.tv indefinitely
> Be released. ...
> ------------ End quote ---------------
That's why I specifically pointed out. 4.99 EUR as
* unique * Payment for * a * unlimited use of mpeg2 is
You a check?
Matthias
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
"Jürgen Hallbauer"
wrote:
>>
>> ---------------- --------------- Quote
>> Editor synonymous succeeded dreißigtägige provide a free license to
>> Receive. As an additional service can mpeg2 after the deadline
>> Against expenses (4.99 euros) on www.sceneo.tv indefinitely
>> Be released. ...
>> ------------ End quote ---------------
>>
> Nja 4.99 euro if your hooks are not white ...
It is not a freeware, as is claimed in the Subject.
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
>>>
>> Nja 4.99 euro if your hooks are not white ...
>
> It is not a freeware, as is claimed in the Subject.
Of course she is das Has nothing to do with a
licensed plug-in or codec for unlimited use
must be released.
Matthias
Antwort von Lars Mueller:
Matthias Berke wrote:
>
> Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
>
>>>>
>>> Nja 4.99 euro if your hooks are not white ...
>>
>> It is not a freeware, as is claimed in the Subject.
>
> Of course it is das Has nothing to do with a
> Licensed plug-in or codec for unlimited use
> Be released.
Hihi, then we do now for new sales pitch, huh? Beautiful
Freeware under the People's throw, but who wants to use it, you need
paid plug-ins? : ->
Nothing against EUR 5 or 10 bucks for a good program. My Nero is synonymous
Cost 5 EUR and that has at least some functions and I
even use it occasionally, but the next problem is yet,
that the plugin is not simply anonymous can buy in the store. There are
So a database with people (whose bank account etc.), for a
Copy program plugin already have money to pay. The copy but
synonymous determines black? Also regardless of such databases
Money tangible worth. And 5 EUR for a plugin, or just a codec is
ultimately synonymous not really cheap. Even if the money to another
Body should go.
Gruß Lars
Antwort von Lutz Bojasch:
Lars Mueller wrote:
> Hihi, then we do now for new sales pitch, huh? Beautiful
> Throw people under the freeware, but who wants to use it, you need
> Fee-plugins? : ->
Hello
Greed destroys not only the character, in the advanced stage
synonymous rational thinking. Teens know it may no longer there
But times were a very big scene of the software programmers with
the name of public domain gave out. Many programs now
any obvious advantage, go to these ideas
Programmers back. Who tatächlich a program is not worth more,
than others on the day fill with smoke, which can give only sorry.
Gruß Lutz
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Lars Mueller wrote:
> Hihi, then we do now for new sales pitch, huh? Beautiful
> Throw people under the freeware, but who wants to use it, you need
> Fee-plugins? : ->
Does it not, because it works synonymous without mpeg2 codec.
> .................................... And 5 EUR for a plugin, or
> Only one codec is ultimately synonymous not really cheap.
Na dann mal ask Jens Fangmeier (Feurio) what licenses cost. :-)
Matthias
Antwort von Lars Mueller:
Bojasch Lutz wrote:
>
> Lars Mueller wrote:
>
>> Hihi, then we do now for new sales pitch, huh? Beautiful
>> Throw people under the freeware, but who wants to use it, you need
>> Plug-ins paid? : ->
>
> Hello
> Greed destroys not only the character, in the advanced stage
> Synonymous rational thinking. Teens know it may no longer there
Lutz, there is still synonymous days on which you have such small
Lashing out did not?
We are not talking about the Height of the price of a program, but
the sales pitch, if it is such an act. What exactly
you understand the term "freeware" is not? Rhetorical question: Is there
in your little universe actually synonymous anything other than
Profit motive? For example, Idealism or something?
I can only wonder slowly. Earlier, I have, inter alia,
a contribution of you read with the "BLÖK" s peppered was previously
several of which turned on the people feel stupid. Continuously and
when you are trying a variety of other topics stranger to reality
suppose, now destroyed, and a Stinginess character. What is happening with
you? Is this for you otherwise? Do you have stress with the family,
here must be disposed?
Lars
Antwort von Lars Mueller:
Matthias Berke wrote:
>
> Lars Mueller wrote:
>
>> Hihi, then we do now for new sales pitch, huh? Beautiful
>> Throw people under the freeware, but who wants to use it, you need
>> Plug-ins paid? : ->
>
> Does it not, because it works synonymous without mpeg2 codec.
And honestly, I do not know what I need, because
I do not burn DVD-Video. Nevertheless, the original posting
Video Copy Program "multitalent for free" "Note on
mpeg2 encoder "at least very misleading. Because if there are significant
Money cost components, we can no longer say that
it is "Free" was. And a video program without copying the most common
Video codec is not necessarily a multi-talent.
Gruß Lars
Antwort von Thomas Beyer:
Lutz wrote Bojasch ...
> Teenies know it may no longer there
> Times but gave a very big scene of the software programmers with
> The name of public domain gave out. Many programs now
> Any obvious advantage, go to these ideas
> Programmers back. Who tatächlich a program is not worth more,
> Other than a day fill with smoke, which can give only sorry.
I've synonymous for many years under the People's freeware brought. Annoyed in
this time, not the cause that I deserve so that no coal had
but it was Unmasse people who (outside of perfectly
desired feedback) thought my mailbox with sayings such as "your
Program is full of shit "," full geiles program, you can not even
quick einauen something, otherwise I like you no more "," bau but
urgent times MPEG2 support, and is to me but do not give a damn if you then
Trouble with the law get - then I habs ja schon ... "etc.)
zuscheissen them. And of course, preferably in the hundreds-Pack
and high-frequency rotating.
* * The nerves in the long term, especially when one remembers that in the years
nothing permanent with that. Meanwhile I am living peacefully under
the wings of commerce, and nothing in the world, I will
this tour will ever do again (which is my highest consideration to the
Today's freeware scene is not terminated).
Think times drüber after. In that respect I give to you as right, especially since "I
free wills as "difficult merkberfreit Group seems to be --
Finally, yes synonymous expect prompt payment of wages for one's own
Labor, overtime premium, night and weekend allowance ...
Thomas
Antwort von Lutz Bojasch:
Thomas Beyer wrote:
> I've synonymous for many years under the People's freeware brought.
Hello
I synonymous, some databases, video management software, etc. However,
for ATARI.
> Think drüber times after. In that respect I give to you as right, especially since "I
> Free wills as "difficult merkberfreit Group seems to be --
> Finally, yes synonymous expect prompt payment of wages for one's own
> Work, overtime premium, night and weekend allowance ...
THE (!) Is what makes me incredibly annoying: The people love the "everything"
want to "immediately", "the finest" natural and selbstversträndlich
Free! The excitement around alleged "sale mesh" is just
Expression of anger that not everything is free of charge, at best,
About Handling a leap to understand. That is in the specific case
not even the program itself but is an additional software
you do not need to buy is when Keifer of Lars forgotten.
Not worthwhile, at this time.
Gruß Lutz
Antwort von Ralf Fontana:
Matthias Berke wrote:
> If someone look for a free, yet comfortable
> Video copying program studied.
So the program is freeware. But so it is doing what it
must be promoted was a little bit about what to buy?
Sounds strange. And not particularly confidence to make it
times the least.
For the first time over the readme (or what is synonymous) to face
you have to get this as a executable file download, and probably
install the program. This is also not particularly
confidence.
The whole looks like an offer the more likely to "click on everything
what is not fast enough to run away "customers needs. WERS
needs ...
--
Now, I have now 43 utilities installed
- And Windows is still not stable
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Lars Mueller wrote:
> And honestly, I do not know what I need, because
> I do not burn DVD-Video. Nevertheless, the original posting
> Video copying program multitalent for free "" Note on
> Mpeg2 encoder "at least very misleading. Because if there are significant
> Components cost money, ...
mpeg2 is * not * an essential part of the program and the purchase of
unlimited use of the codec only one offer, not a must.
Somehow begs me the strong impression on you the info
the program does not read correctly or not.
The universal video-copying machine: Whether DVD, S-VCD or AVI, Sceneo
Vcopy videos easily converted into the right format.
Optimized output. And with the highest image quality. Because Sceneo Vcopy
nanoPEG working with a professional codec from the TV world.
And with the nanoPEG delivers excellent part quality. And that is why
gings it, no more and no less, without mpeg2 codec!
My reference to the text of mpeg2 to be only one eventual
Prevent misunderstanding, that the free to do so.
> And a video program without copying the most common
> Video codec is not necessarily a multi-talent.
It is not without this and the "most popular" video codec, there are
nowhere (legally) for free for unlimited use. So what do you
the fuss? How many of the most common codec for a program must
this nature (of course, free, clear) in order to DMN as such
may apply?
Oh, what should you have "Sceneo Vcopy" do not use.
So you can saved the 5 EUR create, if in 30 years enough
escaped, the rights to buy and then mpeg2-codec/encoder
distribute free of charge. ;-)
Should only one reference to "Sceneo Vcopy" as a new
interesting video tool to be of me. I do not have a buck to me
Codecs, freeware or not, and quibbling about videodichsonstwas
litigate.
In that sense, who wants to be / can be free and his own ruling
form.
For me, EOD
Mat thias
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Ralf Fontana wrote:
> So the program is freeware. But so it is doing what it
> You have been promoted a little bit about what to buy?
Should we not read correctly.
> For about the first times the readme (or what is synonymous) to face
> you have to get this as a executable file download, and probably
> install the program. This is also not particularly
> Confidence.
Ne only read what I wrote - the key word "Forum"
Additionally, there is a help - German and International
http://www.sceneo.tv/modules.php?name%Downloads&d_op%viewdownload&cid=1
EOT
Matthias
Antwort von Christoph Meggl:
"Lutz Bojasch" wrote
> THE (!) Is what makes me incredibly annoying: The people love the "everything"
> Want to "immediately", "the finest" natural and selbstversträndlich
> Nothing! The excitement around alleged "sale mesh" is just
> Expression of anger that not everything is free of charge, at best,
> About as anchor handling to understand. That is in the specific case
> Not even the program itself but is an additional software
> You do not need to buy is when Keifer of Lars forgotten.
> Is not this time.
And where exactly Lars began to Keifer? He wrote it, he is ready
for a program to pay. Keifer here, I see only one other.
Greeting
Christoph
Antwort von Lutz Bojasch:
Christoph Meggle wrote:
> And where exactly Lars began to Keifer? He wrote it, he is ready
> For a program to pay. Keifer here, I see only one other.
Oh man, maybe you will read for yourself:
"Lutz, there is still synonymous days on which you have such small
Lashing out did not? "
Pisa is coming closer, or?
Antwort von Lars Mueller:
Bojasch Lutz wrote:
>
> Christoph Meggle wrote:
>
>> And where exactly Lars began to Keifer? He wrote it, he is ready
>> For a program to pay. Keifer here, I see only one other.
>
> Oh man, maybe you will read for yourself:
> "Lutz, there is still synonymous days on which you have such small
> Lashing out did not? "
> Pisa is coming closer, or?
My goodness, Lutz, that was the answer to your Lashing out and the
even you should know very well! Read times themselves, which
Insults yourself in the corresponding post, and in the past
have two days off. And now we have the next
Insult to the next!
The added twist now, as if it gekeife for 5 EUR, fits
really good to you! I should you in fact a liberation Saved
grant.
It seems really pointless. * * PLONK
Go die. :-(
Antwort von Christoph Meggl:
"Lutz Bojasch" wrote
>> And where exactly Lars began to Keifer? He wrote it, he is ready
>> For a program to pay. Keifer here, I see only one other.
>
> Oh man, maybe you will read for yourself:
> "Lutz, there is still synonymous days on which you have such small
> Lashing out did not? "
Good. In relation to this statement I give you right.
However, it is not exactly "nice" in the greed, lack of character
and lack of rational thinking on the subject matter.
> Pisa is coming closer, or?
What did this again with Pisa to do?
Will this now become a new "Law Godwin, zusammenhangslos
quickly with Pisa to counter, so you would have already lost!
Greeting
Christoph
Antwort von Christoph Meggl:
"Lars Mueller" wrote
> Go to die. :-(
Now, I am ashamed right, the attempt to have
to help you ...
Christoph
Antwort von Lars Mueller:
Matthias Berke wrote:
>
> Lars Mueller wrote:
>
> Mpeg2 is * not * an essential part of the program and the purchase of
> Unlimited use of the codec only one offer, not a must.
Whether the users are synonymous so that the most common format today is not
is essential?
> Somehow pushing very strongly to me the impression you have the info
> The program does not read correctly or not.
>
>
> The Universal Video Copy machine: Whether DVD, S-VCD or AVI, Sceneo
> Vcopy videos easily converted into the right format.
> Optimized edition. And with the highest image quality. Because Sceneo Vcopy
> Works with nanoPEG, a professional codec from the TV world.
>
So synonymous in this paragraph, I can very well remember. Only woher
I should know what is nanoPEG? I thought this was the MP2 codec.
> And with the nanoPEG delivers excellent part quality. And that is why
> Gings it, no more and no less, without mpeg2 codec!
And this is so then no-mpeg2 codec. On the website reads the
related just completely different, especially for DVB also uses mpeg2
is:
-------- Quote:
professional data optimization guaranteed, because Sceneo Vcopy works
with
nanoPEG, a professional codec from the TV world.
Despite the stringent licensing conditions for the mpeg2 encoder, it is the
Editor synonymous succeeded dreißigtägige provide a free license to
receive. As an additional service can mpeg2 after the deadline ...
------- End quote
Good, what is it, or what is it compatible? Which
Hardware player plays from? The people want the most but in a
Players stuck hardware. At least they do not want too many codecs
install, just because we say, I am now back with a completely
unknown thing come along. In a "professional" from the codec
TV World, I thought it will probably be paid to the
Part of act. "Professional" is AFAIK of Profession or
Vocation, professionally and thus related with "Commercial".
> My reference to the text of mpeg2 to be only one eventual
> Misunderstanding counter that the free to do so.
That, however, the misunderstanding created. I understand
not quite understand why the announcement is not simply writes that the
Part mpeg2 without additional fee and can not do that part of
you is! From the brand name and the imprint will give the
not necessarily.
It would have been no misunderstanding and no resentment in this, where I
in the formulation would be much more cautious and that you were
not so frustrated now! Honest!
>> And a video program without copying the most common
>> Video codec is not necessarily a multi-talent.
>
> It is not without this and the "most popular" video codec, there are
> Anywhere (legally) for free for unlimited use. So what do you
> The fuss?
I busy myself about to exceed that Lutz permanently turns people
and abused, but that has now hopefully an end.
> How many of the most common codec for a program must
> Of this nature (of course, free, clear) in order to DMN as such
> Can apply?
How about with the three most common? I think number one in the
Number of users is currently mpeg2: DVB-T, DVB-S, DVD, DV, HDTV, etc. mpeg1
on extinction, mpeg4 is coming, but for high quality yet
not the highest enjoyment.
> Oh, what should you have "Sceneo Vcopy" do not use.
> How can you saved the 5 EUR create, if in 30 years enough
> Escaped, the rights to buy and then mpeg2-codec/encoder
> Free to distribute. ;-)
>
> Should only one reference to "Sceneo Vcopy" as a new
> Interesting video tool of his to me. I do not have a buck to me
> Codecs, freeware or not, and quibbling about videodichsonstwas
> Quarrel.
Tolle sache, das I have not yet tested. Thank you for the
Efforts that you've done and that your work free of charge
available. But next time read it very clearly in
the announcement that it is of thee, that thou mayest not offer mpeg2
_kannst_ and it was hi
Antwort von Thomas Beyer:
Ralf Fontana wrote ...
> Matthias Berke wrote:
>
>> If someone look for a free, yet comfortable
>> Video copying program studied.
>
> So the program is freeware. But so it is doing what it
> You have been promoted a little bit about what to buy?
>
> Sounds strange. And not particularly confidence to make it
> Times the least.
Read at times http://www.motiwala.com/ympeg.htm in the "important" frame,
what the author of the recently presented here "freeware MPEG2 codecs"
YMPEG now has to say ...
> For about the first times the readme (or what is synonymous) to face
> you have to get this as a executable file download, and probably
> install the program. This is also not particularly
> Confidence.
I will not Lanze for Sceneo Vcopy break, because I have a
Such a tool is not needed and does not install
be. At my time, however, the gabs manuals plus detailed
History in advance (Aminet, who still knows it ;-), but this makes it
Nowadays, hardly a, -%.
Gruss,
Thomas
Antwort von Lars Mueller:
Christoph Meggle wrote:
>> Go to die. :-(
>
> Now, I am ashamed right, the attempt to have
> To help you ...
[] You know what that means on Usenet.
Yes, I have myself as a newbie synonymous times excited about this formulation.
http://www.little-penguin.de/othersites/inet/usenet1.htm
HTH
Lars
Antwort von Arne Schween:
"Lars Mueller" wrote in message
news: c7j3u8 $ 2tmt $ 1@ulysses.news.tiscali.de ...
> Matthias Berke wrote:
>> And with the nanoPEG delivers excellent part quality. And that is why
>> Got it, no more and no less, without mpeg2 codec!
>
> And this is so then no-mpeg2 codec. (...)
Hello Lars,
read times http://www.nanocosmos.de/ ( "Products"). It is a MPEG Codec
Family, if you so wish. I've just seen there for myself and there
synonymous a VCopy "found screenshot of its structure and functions
the Sceneo VCopy like an egg as the others. Interesting ... behind
Buhl Data Sceneo is likely to have simply licensed VCopy
optical, and adjusted or adapted.
Gruß,
Arne
Antwort von Lars Mueller:
Arne Schween wrote:
> Read times http://www.nanocosmos.de/ ( "Products"). It is a MPEG Codec
> Family, so if you want. I've just seen there for myself and there
Aha, thanks for the link! So go slowly on me a Christmas tree. :-)
> Synonymous a VCopy "found screenshot of its structure and functions
> The Sceneo VCopy like an egg as the others. Interesting ... behind
> Sceneo Buhl Data is likely to have simply licensed VCopy
> Optical, and adjusted or adapted.
Odd. Maybe there's even a comment about this. In Buhl
is yes AFAIR somewhere that it is a freeware collection of
various authors that if I had not misunderstood.
Gruß Lars
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Lars Mueller wrote:
last brief comment:
Clear misunderstanding Lars - "Sceneo Vcopy" is not of me.
I am only user of Sceneo Vcopy ", otherwise I have nothing to
create!
> If you put value on, I will gladly submit a brief report,
> If I do that, to test it. At the moment, missing me
> Video applications still in the TV or DVB-S card.
The girls and boys in the forum and the developer team would be about
look. Honest ;-)
And away
Matthias
Antwort von Christoph Meggl:
"Lars Mueller" wrote
>>> Go to die. :-(
>>
>> Now, I am ashamed right, the attempt to have
>> You to help ...
>
> [] You know what that means on Usenet.
>
> Yes, I am newbie as synonymous times excited about this formulation.
>
> http://www.little-penguin.de/othersites/inet/usenet1.htm
Ok - this link puts the statement.
Schön I find this still does not.
Greeting
Christoph
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Lars Mueller wrote:
here
Should only one reference to "Sceneo Vcopy" as a new
interesting video tool to be of me.
This is probably a misunderstanding.
Thus, it is clear:
-------
Should only one of me his notice.
On "Sceneo Vcopy", an interesting new video tool
-------
Sceneo is a trademark of Buhl Data
http://www.sceneo.tv/modules.php?name%Sections&op%viewarticle&artid
Lars Alles Klar? ;-)
Sorry for the confusion!
and away
Matthias
Antwort von Ralf Fontana:
Bojasch Lutz wrote:
> Oh man, maybe you will read for yourself:
> "Lutz, there is still synonymous days on which you have such small
> Lashing out did not? "
That was a well-reasoned and understandable question.
--
Now, I have now 43 utilities installed
- And Windows is still not stable
Antwort von Ralf Fontana:
Matthias Berke wrote:
>
> The Universal Video Copy machine: Whether DVD, S-VCD or AVI, Sceneo
> Vcopy videos easily converted into the right format.
> Optimized edition. And with the highest image quality. Because Sceneo Vcopy
> works with nanoPEG, a professional codec from the TV world.
>
>
> And with the nanoPEG delivers excellent part quality. And that is why
> gings it, no more and no less, without mpeg2 codec!
It's still a question whether the designation as freeware
Vertigo label or not.
So butter for the fish: nanoPEG is part of the freeware?
--
Now, I have now 43 utilities installed
- And Windows is still not stable
Antwort von Ralf Fontana:
Matthias Berke wrote:
>> So the program is freeware. But so it is doing what it
>> You have been promoted a little bit about what to buy?
> Do not read correctly.
I should like to read. Especially in the context and times from first
Instance.
>> For about the first times the readme (or what is synonymous) to face
>> you have to get this as a executable file download, and probably
>> install the program. This is also not particularly
>> Confidence.
> Ne only read what I wrote - the key word "Forum"
if (name% Ralf.Fontana)
then FORUMúlse
> In addition, there is a help - German and International
and without running the executable unreadable.
I'm not the next. And I would really like to own
read what's there now and what is the freeware freeware can.
--
Now, I have now 43 utilities installed
- And Windows is still not stable
Antwort von Markus Zingg:
> It's still a question whether the designation as freeware
> Vertigo label or not.
I have not viewed, but perhaps that is about
All MPEG2 encoder & decoder from patent law with MPEG-LA
must be licensed. I do not know exactly how it is today, but
A year ago, the license was still $ 5 per encoder / decoder. License
owed is synonymous with freeware. That the author is not synonymous Freeware
nor the MPEG LA license will pay for itself is so clear and Legal
Problems for free is synonymous not for everyone. If it's
comes to the author the same way but better on his Page
declared so that all is transparent.
Markus
Antwort von Frank Derlin:
"Ralf Fontana wrote ...
> Matthias Berke wrote:
>
>>
>> The Universal Video Copy machine: Whether DVD, S-VCD or AVI, Sceneo
>> Vcopy videos easily converted into the right format.
That is, in my view, somewhat exaggerated. As for the cutting
concerned, it "converts" it seems MPG1 video for "VCD / PAL".
352x288 is true, but for me the wrong format.
>> Optimized edition. And with the highest image quality. Because Sceneo Vcopy
>> Works with nanoPEG, a professional codec from the TV world.
>>
I can not understand. This would require the "codec" probably only
activated.
>> And with the nanoPEG delivers excellent part quality. And that is why
>> Got it, no more and no less, without mpeg2 codec!
>
> It's still a question whether the designation as freeware
> Vertigo label or not.
I see that in any case not as freeware, at best, as Liteware
or Nagware. If the contributions mentioned in the forum to be believed,
then it is obviously synonymous nor adware after the codec activated
(and paid) was.
http://www.pricelessware.org/2004/Glossary2004PL.htm
> Also in the butter fish: nanoPEG is part of the freeware?
The license provision, yes.
That is the crux. It could well be synonymous Freeware
use, so without this nanoPEG MPEG2 encoder to activate
However, the annoying requester after the expiry of 30 days
and the SOFTWARE LICENSE "a clearly different language.
The Inno installer can I find it most interesting. LZMA, bz2
or zlib, and the fact that you created so that installation
Archives do not seem to auto can unpack.
Gruß, Frank
Antwort von Ralf Fontana:
Markus Zingg wrote:
>> It's still a question whether the designation as freeware
>> Vertigo label or not.
> I have not viewed, but perhaps that is about
> All MPEG2 encoder & decoder from patent law with MPEG-LA
> must be licensed.
That is what I synonymous from the postings here and elsewhere
was closed.
The Conclusion is that it not freeware with MPEG2 function will take place.
As nothing in the definition of freeware may change. Freeware does
that what she is doing, without the need to be paid.
--
Now, I have now 43 utilities installed
- And Windows is still not stable
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Ralf Fontana wrote:
> It's still a question whether the designation as freeware
> Vertigo label or not.
>
> Also in the butter fish: nanoPEG is part of the freeware?
Yes.
Matthias
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Ralf Fontana wrote:
> And without executing the executable unreadable.
>
> I'm not the next. And I would really like to own
> Read what's in it now is and what the freeware freeware can.
I do not understand where the problem is the exe to extract. but
then you need to stop with the authors directly inquire.
Matthias
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Derlin Frank wrote:
>>> Edition Optimized. And with the highest image quality. Because Sceneo Vcopy
>>> Works with nanoPEG, a professional codec from the TV world.
>>>
>
> Can I do not understand. This would require the "codec" probably only
> Enabled.
Only the mpeg2 codec.
> I see that in any case not as freeware, at best, as Liteware
> Or Nagware. If the contributions mentioned in the forum to be believed,
> Then it is obviously synonymous nor adware after the codec activated
> (And pay) was.
> http://www.pricelessware.org/2004/Glossary2004PL.htm
I would be there on the forums, if you're of the opinion. The
Authors answer with certainty.
> That is the crux. It could well be synonymous Freeware
> Use, so without this nanoPEG MPEG2 encoder to activate
> However, the annoying requester after the expiry of 30 days
> And the "SOFTWARE LICENSE" a clearly different language.
nanoPEG =! mpeg2
Matthias
Antwort von Ralf Fontana:
Matthias Berke wrote:
[Help File]
>> And without executing the executable unreadable.
>
>> I'm not the next. And I would really like to own
>> Read what's in it now is and what the freeware freeware can.
> I do not understand where the problem is the exe to extract.
The problem is that I currently do not have a Windows installation to
Burning freely voted. To install after the experience I
Malware on the PC I would have brought the.
> but then you need to stop with the authors directly inquire.
Nope, I have not. As the authors, the authors ask times
whether they have the IQ of a Siberian crab, or with full
(less respectable) intention to access the help file and readme
limit.
--
Now, I have now 43 utilities installed
- And Windows is still not stable
Antwort von Matthias Berke:
Ralf Fontana wrote:
>> But then you need to stop with the authors directly inquire.
>
> Nope, I have not.
True, you need not. ;-)
Matthias
