Frage von nolife:
thus
Ein Hallo erstmal s.alle!
after I've read quite a while now, the forum and synonymous few tests, etc. I still have to ask.
And because of the photo feature of the camcorder. I myself do not have a digicam and it would carry around synonymous bloed always find nen ne camcorder and digicam - I am not a Chinese turist with 10283745 bags and cameras.
of is 3.1 (2048x1512) to 4.0 (2288x1728), a really big differences "visible" .. I mean 3.1 for normal range of family pictures?
I realize that there is a different .. Only the dummy for nen normalo user profile?
And especially when I have about 250 camcorders drauflegen ¬ hinzubekommen to the ..
how do you think? .. unfortunately I could not, for example pictures in different resolutions to find .. because then I could look at it
Antwort von Stefan:
Apply for a fotofähigen camcorder: "When Videografieren you can not shoot." If you want to have video and photos of the same motif, you need to use separate devices.
At the par Resolutionbei defined megapixel number, there is an interesting chart:
http://www.digicamfotos.de/newsletter/bildrechner.php
My opinion: 4 megapixels instead of 3.1 megapixels do not make the coal-fat.
Good luck
The fat Stefan
Antwort von nolife:
Thanks
Your link has helped me.
Antwort von rakzak:
My opinion: 4 megapixels instead of 3.1 megapixels do not make the coal-fat.
Clasp me to that. Unless you want to do right, somewhat larger paper prints. Then like more pix.
Make're 2 years old with a small Pentax Cam photos, and has only 2048x1536 .. I use it s.Computer, and hats s.Pixeln has seldom been missing. As for me, however genuine verrücktmacht the depth of field. But this is not s.den pixels ...
Antwort von Jan:
Hello Nolife,
equally important is synonymous to the sensor size and optics.
Most consumer cameras have 1 / 6 ", 1 / 4, 5 or 1 / 3" CCD 's.
Even very low Digiknippsen already have a 1 / 2, 5 "CCD, 1 / 1, 8" or I have in store for under 400 ¬ Konica Minolta A-200 with 2 / 3 "CCD.
Therefore, one can not compare a phone screen with 2 million with one Digicam Picture, the mobile sensors are usually much smaller and the light-sensitive pixels synonymous.
I have even a 1 million pixel Stillimage 10x15 of SonyW 5 (For me, the best in the class with 1 / 1, 8) that the SonyEricsson mobile phone images 2 million locker suggests. The subtleties of "tree branches" were much finer structure.
For a 10x15 has 3 million pixels, of course, perfectly adequate, 5 million can not be represented on this size / see.
I have pictures of the digicam 10x15 with 3 million, 5 Normal / Fine and all customers mistype and always keep the 3 for 5 and vice versa.
Even a Supermarktcam with 5-7 million is usually poorer in quality than the top firms camera with 3 million
Low-cost carriers like to use cheap plastic lens and the camera usually goes to sleep - less expensive signal processor.
My dad had to identify the difference synonymous - formerly Concord 5 million (not interpolated) is now a new Canon 410 3.2 million - even his A-4 posters look much better.
So the best video digicam at the moment is probably Canon MVX 4i (the CCD is 1 / 2, 8), for VideoaktivDigital it is currently the best video camera in Canon XM 2, SonyVX 2100 and the HDV model, and even scored higher than The Panasonic GS 250 or the SonyHC 90th
LG
January
Antwort von Peter S.:
For me, the photos from digital camcorders are not good enough. Regardless of whether the thing has now 2,3 or 4 megapixels: The result is simply bad. Even my old Olympus camera with 1.3 megapixels was much better photos than any camcorder I have tested until now.
MFG Peter
Antwort von nolife:
Hello!
Danke erstmal s.alle:)
I have now got the Panasonic NV 400th There have been many reports have convinced me easily.
Then I hang about on the supply and wüsche you much fun!
