Frage von 0711video:
For several days I Werkel with the pana 160, were the last kaufanstoesse Promising sounding slashcam test and the current output active video. I was glad to actually target candidates sony nx 5 (not NEX5!) does not have to be bought. I like myself as seen on youtube, a video that the nx 5 compares with the pana 160, pana are clearly better, more natural images (especially in lowlight) produced. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e full of joy I have, however, beginning mitlerweile word here several messages from the practice-read, where the camera came off not so good: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e - The autofocus is slow or mistaken about anywhere in the parameters specified point and would jump (this experience, I have made synonymous not only with non-contrast motifs) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e - The camera is not so bright,in tele stop the aperture to darken at least 3.8 \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e - Peak function and focus assist are unusable (all schimmere redish or garnix) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e - A blinding speed, greater than 4, the image would take the edge off, si stehts in provideocoalition (why is this so?) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Could be a software update to improve these weak points about anyway? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e so far I could test the camera mostly just anywhere inside and got my first weeks of turning to make money in only three. I have known and intensively studying the instructions for use. haptic me the camera is very good in the hand of the user and I find it enjoyable. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e overall I'm disillusioned because of the above weaken, over and wonder if the nx 5 but not the worse but figuratively, but
 |
Antwort von Jörg:
Well, the most general of all my opinions are possible: \u003cbr /\u003e hoer on to want to read something and understand what someone has written, his background and experience, you know not to be deemed, canst ... \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Make your own experiences ask that question inconsistencies in here, and waiting for solutions / explanations. \u003cbr /\u003e Here is a good chance to get users to be able to assess the part that will help you. \u003cbr /\u003e You are indeed synonymous with slashvam certainly not in front of users who seem totally unable to cope of the cam are, they do not even understand the approach, but loud lament ... the experiences of the others will be all the more instructive. \u003cbr /\u003e Your counts cam to cams, waiting to be discovered, just like her predecessor,. \u003cbr /\u003e Are some of the synonymous
Antwort von HT:
\u003cdiv class=\Video is shown the difference is not usually. Therefore, yes, your Headline be Bejat be synonymous, the AC-160 is not the perfect camera. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cdiv class=\locomotives) \u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e An auto-focus will never be perfect. What a slow and indecisive as beszeichen called by the other, "he responded calmly," and what others praise as firmly gripping, others say he would be nervous. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cdiv class=\cameras built today are physical reasons and not to change so. The declarationofcompliance is not so trivial (at least if one wants to make it correct). If you like Google have time for the following terms: diffraction Airy disk. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von VideoUndFotoFan:
\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von 0711video:
1080 50 p with clay in fruehjahr heard you so!
Antwort von VideoUndFotoFan:
Yes, clearly ... So I wrote it already synonymous "... \u003cspan style=\
