Frage von der_janno:
hello together,
I sit straight s.einem background replacement and had not given up hope yet, I work a little easier.
The project was financed by avid s.after effects over. since no coal s.start, there's no automatic duck license and therefore does not synonymous EDL which I can rely.
there are three default sizes, which of course always in the right context must be set.
previously'm such a way that every time I cut a flat marker set and a comment about the attitudinal scale had left behind. so I could in the second passage then realize what background I have to.
I have 2 times the level duplicated, with each of these levels of the corresponding background level and linked with each umschnitt opacity keyframes for the set.
All is' to have lots of hard work, because the sequences up to 90 min. long.
I then came the idea that you maybe have a synonymous expression could solve. Unfortunately, I am on the field does not fit, but eventually I get a yes Kline assistance.
I've asked myself whether it möglichist the comments read out of the flat markers and with whose help a little if / else query to start, then for me the opacity controls.
for other solutions, I am very grateful synonymous! =)
beste grüße
Janno
Antwort von Mylenium:
www.motionscript.com - All fixed and ready vorgekaut. Comments can only be read with CS3, otherwise halt the use of the marker.
Mylenium
Antwort von der_janno:
many thanks for the link.
Schnall's seems I still can not.
after I've since read a bit, I assumed that this small zeile should solve my problem:
if (marker.key == marker.key ( "l"). time) 100 else 0
naja. . the opacity of it feels quite unimpressed.
someone sees my errors?
beste grüße
Antwort von Mylenium:
many thanks for the link.
Schnall's seems I still can not.
after I've since read a bit, I assumed that this small zeile should solve my problem:
if (marker.key == marker.key ( "l"). time) 100 else 0
naja. . the opacity of it feels quite unimpressed.
someone sees my errors?
beste grüße The little snippet just gives you a trigger event is exactly s.der spot where the marker sits. You have to have him somehow still teach that the value synonymous after the marker to be maintained (time> marker.time & & time <marker (x +1). Time). How to do it again now synonymous nich ...
Mylenium
Antwort von der_janno:
ui. .. in this moment, I seem to be synonymous again s.meine limits.
because of trigger, on the self marker opacity remains unaffected.
can that be?
beste grüße
Antwort von Mylenium:
Well perhaps the markers do not sit properly or the test condition is insufficient. But anyway, so I still do not understand what you really want to do and what you can now make your decision to want. The logic between the markers you need to have ausknobeln to determine which "segment" you are. Markers are nothing else than a special form of keys, so would something like
nearestKey (time) markerKey. (index)
the marker to the time indicator s.nächsten is returned. Then the previous and next find, decide whether you are in the first half of the intermediate segment or the Second're (yes because of the "next" dynamically adjusts marker) and compare the times, then stop somewhere still using the strings of your comments filter. Stop a few lines of code, but should be feasible.
Mylenium
