Frage von Kenni:
Hello, can someone tell me how big a 1 / 6 CCD in mm - height times width. I need the data to use in a tracking software indicated.
Wär genial if your exact size of the CCD Panasonic GS320 knew.
Thank you
Antwort von robbie:
The diagonal is 1 / 6 inch. The aspect ratio of 4:3 or 16:9.
(4x) ^ 2 + (3x) ^ 2 = (1 / 6) ^ 2 or the whole and then with 16:9 in cm conversion.
Antwort von UFOhunter:
I have read the information on 1 / 6 is not really the current size of the sensor, which companies use it is, but it is still of the old film sizes - I have not quite understood - was in English.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Aha. That has not sow now understood, is more uncertain than it has helped and was wrong. Do you have anything else help? For example, a link, where it is?
Antwort von UFOhunter:
So here again in English.
Further investigation (incomplete and not totally comprehended) reveals that the measurement of CCDs is apparently a bit of marketing hype like the way they measure CRT's and TV screens (cheating us out of a diagonal inch).
In the case of CCDs, their measurement is not direct but based upon a comparison with the older technology of pickup tubes. One post I found says that instead of 25.4 millimeters, the CCD "inch" is based on 16mm.
Antwort von Jan:
So if I have correctly calculated that is 1 / 6 "CCD size = 2.67 mm, or more precisely, 2.66666672. If the area of 1 / 6" really fully exploited.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Thomas Köln:
mh only the amount I need and the wide - and I've written s.Panasonic maybe can help me
Antwort von WoWu:
1 / 6 "Pixelaerea 2.5 x1, 8mm 762pixel horizontally 582 V 7.26 lux at 0db 20ms Integrationszei ... what you also need?
You purchase my book .. because with all the details ..
Gruss
Wolfgang
Antwort von Kenni:
be called a pixel is 2.5x1.8mm?
Antwort von Thomas Köln:
no, a pixel is so big ...
Antwort von WoWu:
Hi Kenny ...
... no, the target area has the dimensions. To view the pixel size you need to calculate the 1.8 mm by the number of rows that is the Picture of the Optics gets offered. Also you have the area of course still in the right spatial level set. 16:9 So if you want to do what remains of the 1.8 mm line bit (now have no calculator): So your 16 would be 2.5 mm (-10% margin) and your 9 would be the equivalent of 1 part 8mm (without the edge, because the CCD is larger.)
But what do you want to do because if you still have questions, register ...
Gruß,
Wolfgang
Antwort von Kenni:
So I do not understand this - I now synonymous perhaps a little difficult of definition.
I really only brauce the film back so the size of the CCD 's in the case because I do not on analog 16mm or 35mm have been reported.
This mass (H x W) in millimeters to 0.000 (three decimal places) so I have a Softwarprogramm (3d tracking) can enter.
Based on the movement of the camera and the like information. "Film-back" the program then calculates the exate camera position in space. Thereafter, the data in a 3d software scanned and processed (see Match Moving)
Antwort von Jan:
Still Color Image and Wikipedia to write & write
1 / 2, 5 "= 6.4 mm diagonal. Then would my value synonymous for 1 / 6" agree, if you can think of three.
VG
Jan
Antwort von WoWu:
Kennin, which I have already written:
2.5 x1, 8mm is the CCD size
I have you even written the resolution .... It allows you to calculate the pixel size, because you've asked. And in turn, is of course dependent on the form if you do 4:3 or 16:9.
There were really but now all the answers there ....
But so what ever you want to do now synonymous:
The size of a 1 / 6 "CCD 's is [b] 2.5 x 1.8 mm !!![/ b]
Antwort von Thomas Köln:
The name of the chip size was of the outside diameter of the old picture tubes derived. However, the sensitive area of the tube is significantly smaller than the outside diameter of the tubes:
For example, a 1 "tube with an active area of an image diagonal of about 16 mm.
A 1 "- CCD chip has, by definition, the same screen size as a 1" tube.
So the length of the diagonal image familiar (at 1 / 2 "CCD 8 mm in 1 / 3" CCDs 6 mm) to the correct dimensions of the photosensitive surface equation:
What is dan the diagonal of a 1 / 6 "?
Antwort von Jan:
So you can not use three-pronged approach?
VG
Jan
Antwort von WoWu:
... that is not so readily available, the three-pronged approach to take. But if it the Height of the chip and have the number of rows displayed, and whether the format 16:9 or 4:3 should be .... then the bill but now really no longer work ....
Antwort von hannes:
> ... Then the bill but now really no longer work ....
Right.
But the start again, if we draw the potential depth
want to calculate with a given lens diameter of 26mm
and smallest Aperture 1.6.
[Just so you do not einschlaft (;-)))]
Antwort von zwiebel_sondermann:
So Panasonic has now responded and perhaps help the yes which one or the other here.
With reference to your request, we share with you that it is
the sensor chips to 4:3 with a diagonal of 0.423 cm applies.
Each CCD sensor of the camcorder NV-GS320 has a width of 0.339 cm and
Height of a 0.254 cm. Thank you for your efforts
Kenni
Antwort von zwiebel_sondermann:
.... then it is a 1 / 4 "chip ....! and not 1 / 6"
Antwort von Markus:
.... then it is a 1 / 4 "chip ....! and not 1 / 6" Computed it again at rest by 2.54 cm equal one inch. 1 / 6 "would be those specified 0.423 cm in the diagonal, divided by 2.54 at 6th
Antwort von Kenni:
dan is the statement of Wolfgang so silly!
Quote: The size of a 1 / 6 "CCD 's is [b] 2.5 x 1.8 mm!
Antwort von Jan:
Eventually, one has the wrong answer to Wikipedia is clearly
1 / 2, 5 "= 6.4 mm, according to your formula 2.54 / 2.5 cm 1016 comes out, in Color Image Still it was 6.4 mm as synonymous with the Wiki.
Eventually, one is on the bottle steamer.
Antwort von hannes:
> Then the statement of Wolfgang so silly!
I do not think so, but exactly what I am currently researching synonymous.
If the customs data are applied to the old tube-related,
(and exactly the purpose I currently have no reliable evidence)
is the true measure of the chips, in fact smaller.
Antwort von Jan:
A stupid feeling tells me - Pana is wrong - it would be synonymous not the first time the world is completely verplanen company ...
VG
Jan
Antwort von Markus:
The problem s.der "Inch-thing" is that there is no universally uniform Umrechungsgröße there.
Antwort von WoWu:
.. Hello ...
... Although I know the camera, but anyway I can not imagine that because the 1 / 6 "sensor .... but there have seis drum.
So, here again the extent of CCD's in sequence:
2 / 3 "= 8.8 x 6.6 mm
1 / 2 "= 6.4 x 4.8 mm
1 / 3 "= 4.8 x 3.6 mm
1 / 4 "= 3.2 x 2.4 mm
1 / 6 "= 2.5 x 1.8 mm
Respectively the Abtastfläche. I have spared me, the other individual data, such as diagonal and pixel count listed ....
It would have been helpful had Panasonic once the chip type (manufacturer and name) is given, it would be a search a breeze ... it is something specific in the murky ...
If I can contribute something ... happy.
Perhaps synonymous interesting for you:
http://www.auberge-tv.de/GYHD-100/Erfahrungsbericht.html
Antwort von PowerMac:
Book your interested no one. Your 100-HD Test synonymous anyone. Why do you constantly post your advertising?
Antwort von zwiebel_sondermann:
because then a lot of advertising is cool 8)
Antwort von susiwong:
... maybe read some is synonymous so hard ...
Antwort von Jan:
Yes the Panasonic & the husband & wife has simply converted to inches, whether the 100% true, I dare to doubt.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Jan:
Hi you,
today 2 hab Fuji CCDs in the hand held. Here's the dimensions of the Abtastfläche:
1 / 2, 5 "
Height: 5 mm
Length: 6 mm
Size: 7 mm
Super CCD 1 / 1, 6 "
Height: 7 mm
Length: 9 mm
Size: 1 cm
More specifically, I could unfortunately not be measured.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Book your interested no one. How do you know so exactly?
;-)
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
today 2 hab Fuji CCDs in the hand had I have still something quite different in the hand and had
not poste the extent Ätsch ;-)
