Newsmeldung von slashCAM:slashCAM ClipKanal: First Test Video of SonyNEX-VG10 - July 15, 2010 09:45:00 zum Bild Das erste Test- Video , in dem der neue SonyCamcorder NEX-VG10 with APS-Sensor and Wechselobjektiven in Form eines Prototypen vorgestellt wird and damit geschossene Bilder gezeigt werden.
Click here for the video on slashCAM
Antwort von jwd96:
When I click on the link "here it goes to the video on slashCAM" click, then comes only:
Unfortunately, the address of the requested document to you last - but it should be no problem to find it again using our search:
Antwort von ruessel:
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMTg5ODI0OTE2.html
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMTg5ODA4MTMy.html
Antwort von rush:
http://www.slashcam.de/clipkanal/video.pl?modus=show&post_id=70
Antwort von tmh1608:
So I'd really wanted of me the Canon. Incomprehensible why the product management has slept there Sun Absence really only XLR Connections. I would be interested more precisely, how to film in practice without Zoom Lever can be. For beginners this is probably really disappointing rumgezoome without wild ;-)
Estimate the pre-series is still working at 60 Hz because of the blurred movement?
Antwort von rush:
I would be interested more precisely, how to film in practice without Zoom Lever can be. For beginners this is probably really disappointing rumgezoome without wild ;-)
Zoom directly to the respective s.Zoomring Optics. Photo optics always provide a zoom ring - should not be a problem with it to zoom synonymous wild:)
Antwort von jwd96:
Yes, zoom is so wild even much better! (:
Antwort von pailes:
Zoom directly to the respective s.Zoomring Optics. Photo optics always provide a zoom ring
Who wants to zoom lenses. Powerful Primes will of man.
- Should not be a problem with it to zoom synonymous wild:)
Zoom s.der Optics works in my opinion not very good.
Antwort von deti:
... For me the result looks pretty much the same, like at Canon. It may be that the form factor is more suitable for shooting, but the bottom line is no innovation. Even here you have to work with external ND filters and requires any device to zoom in and Schärfeziehen.
This Canon is the better solution, especially as a wider range s.Objektiven on the market.
Deti
Antwort von jwd96:
Time a question ...
AVCHD is H.264 yet, right?
The Canon of DSLRs take on even in H.264, but why the data can then edit the Canon AVCHD so much worse than when it is really the same?
It is always everywhere, that we, the EOS clips, as they are, edit almost can not, but should convert it, which you do not synonymous with AVCHD?
Antwort von pailes:
Time a question ...
AVCHD is H.264 yet, right?
Yes.
The Canon of DSLRs take on even in H.264, but why the data can then edit the Canon AVCHD so much worse than when it is really the same?
Is not the case. Can be worked almost equally good or equally bad.
It is always everywhere, that we, the EOS clips, as they are, edit almost can not, but should convert it, which you do not synonymous with AVCHD?
Depends s.welches NLE you prefer. Some can with AVCHD at some not. Fact is: if you want to work with AVCHD natively, then you need really big hardware H.264 in a MOV container is the same.
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMTg5ODI0OTE2.html
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMTg5ODA4MTMy.html
Make no bad Eindruch the thing, but always buy something new is not in it for me (unfortunately)
Regards Rolf ...
