Frage von Xergon:
Hi,
you beat someone of experience who Camera better low-light photography?
In question would the Panasonic SD707 or the Canon EOS 550D with 2.8er Lens. Possibly synonymous the XR550 of Sony.
Is really only create noise about night shots, and the whole wide angle as possible.
I'm thankful for every tip!
Stefan
Antwort von SammyGray:
What kind of shots it should be accurate?
Antwort von B.DeKid:
And how much "night" is that? -)
And you will later blow up a script about it DeNoiser `?
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Büschel:
The SD-707 focused in the dark better, faster and quieter and is sharper. The 550D is simply scrap the shooting and has very little depth of field at F2.8 synonymous.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Hi,
you beat someone of experience who Camera better low-light photography?
In question would the Panasonic SD707 or the Canon EOS 550D with 2.8er Lens. Possibly synonymous the XR550 of Sony.
Is really only create noise about night shots, and the whole wide angle as possible.
I'm thankful for every tip!
Stefan I have taken for this purpose, the EOS 550 D.
Who has a clue as with a video DSRL is to film, to be synonymous achieve good results.
Antwort von Büschel:
Who has a clue as with a video DSRL is to film, to be synonymous achieve good results. Exactly, and all others are stupid and do not know nech have ;-) ...
Antwort von hilpers:
have also now been more than a month, the 550D with the sigma 17-70 mm in the insert. initially that is already a very nice gefuddel. as it is but pure.
lowlight for things is the thing sooo much better than my old hf 100, which is certainly synonymous s.dem much larger sensor of the dslr, but you can s.besten you of someone explain ahnung more than I have.
I have little idea of digital camera technology, but still does not disqualify me, one to be able to make subjective judging. which was highly praised here hf 100 years ago second
what the 550D has been spat Sun s.ergebnissen was s.dynamik noise behavior, and especially in the outcomes of lowlightverhalten HF100 (which I had long time to consider).
for you but not the auto focus and a convenient things in ergonomics, the 550D is not synonymous dolle Sun
I will recommend you look around on your vimeo and the results of the potential candidate for the purchase nuclear criteria to compare accordingly.
The bundle of the kit-550D-is considered price-performance for which you get really bomb and in my opinion at the moment unrivaled. Although this is kitobjektiv not built well, is synonymous not necessarily the brightest, but has apparently nevertheless a very good illustration service. it can be constructed.
And another thing: in some situations, I hope even a auto focus back, but the man who operates the camera is the absence of alternative forced to develop techniques and thus help to take a close with the device to employ.
I regret the purchase at least not, though I've done before with great difficulty.
gruß and much success
Hilp
Antwort von meawk:
*** Note of admin: of coming here *** The SD-707 focused in the dark better, quieter and faster and is more acute. The 550D is simply scrap the shooting and has very little depth of field at F2.8 synonymous. Your text shows that you have no idea: is for the trash. Can not understand why you will sit down for such a nonsense s.den PC and press the keyboard.
The SD 707 is, at times compared to the 550D leave a rating, in Lowlightbereich with "scrap equate. . .
The depth of field at f2.8 with the other is the screamer. . .
Thank you for your attention.
Antwort von meawk:
Who has a clue as with a video DSRL is to film, which is synonymous achieve good results.
Exactly, and all others are stupid and do not know nech have ;-) ... Nööööö - the other not, but with safety shower;)
Antwort von Büschel:
meawk: Then show me your time oh so impressive cinematography or suck my rear sight, Blödi. If the 550D is supposedly better than the SD-707, which are then first Head-to-second and why is there any camcorder in the price range just under 1000 ¬, if V-DSLRs are sooo much better after all? So shit, show evidence or go ...(; now do you think are the only one who can Stenke here)
I had the 550D already in the Test and the video function is simply bad. Point.
Antwort von blip:
Please remain objective!
Antwort von Replay:
Especially since it not a "better" or "Worse" are. Shooting for a DSLR has its merits and the SD707 also has its advantages. And both have juicy compared to the other device synonymous disadvantages. It is simply on the intended use and personal preference.
For me (Be careful, your own opinion!) Would be a DSLR for shooting synonymous anything, I would clearly take the SD707. But this has no claim to universality, so I do not understand of that one so it can get into your hair. If any film but with the thing with which he achieved that, what he wants to achieve.
So every now and stay pretty relaxed and breathe through your pants ^ ^
Antwort von meawk:
meawk: Then show me your time oh so impressive cinematography or suck my rear sight, Blödi. If the 550D is supposedly better than the SD-707, which are then first Head-to-second and why is there any camcorder in the price range just under 1000 ¬, if V-DSLRs are sooo much better after all? So, show evidence or go shit ... (my now you're the only one who can Stenke here)
I had the 550D already in the Test and the video function is simply bad. Point. Where you come from - You seem totally "Assi to be" in your language.
Why should we make a Comparison with a pure Beginner / Amateur / Children Birthday Filmer-camera as the SD 707, there still can not even change a Lens - for technically minded film-maker is the scrap. . .
But, whom do I write this ?????
Thank you for your attention.
