Infoseite // the camera is crucial for the recording quality?

Frage von highland:


hallo zusammen

I have this camcorder to be fetched times dm->

http://www.amazon.de/JVC-GR- DV-P-1-GR-DVP1-MiniDV -Camcorders/dp/B00005M23M

and now I am only a little closer with the specific video / video editing is concerned. My question relates to the optical image after überspeilen on the pc. I have already rumprobiert much, but unfortunately did not find improvements.

the "problem" is that the picture on your TV verpixelt represents. I am not the focus setting but just the quality. what makes me dannn synonymous leads to the question whether it is just s.dem camcorder? cc simply that this can not be better .. or so it has nothing to do .. different bands, I have also been tried, with no representation in the attractive exercise was different.



Antwort von torti3005:

"Highlander" wrote: hallo zusammen

the "problem" is that the picture on your TV verpixelt represents. I am not the focus setting but just the quality.
was.

Kanst you have the problem a bit more accurately describe?



Antwort von torti3005:

if eg a film I've recorded, then I play it on the disk in avi dv codec

to see what we could do better, I have a piece of movie times in only converts mpeg-2 with a resolution of 720 x 576 and a rate of 8000b/sec

if I have this mpeg file now reflect on the TV set, then the building in order, but we recognize partially pixel ... I do not know how I describe it differently is

I've a picture from a video taken ... which is in the quality is no preference as to whether it is like in these pictures to darker shots, or whether the filming of the space is brightly lit

http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ineteh2.png

is to see what I mean??



Antwort von torti3005:

How old is your camera about ????????



Antwort von highland:

ca 5 years



Antwort von Axel:

Salut Highland,
it can hardly judge whether with a new 1-chip camera a much better picture would have emerged. This one would have to have a direct comparison. Such shots with many "impressionist" Farbkleckse - the graduated red / brown of the leaves - leave the boundaries of the PAL resolution Always see. Optimal would be a Portrait of a person in a striped sweater. Perhaps you have something on hand?

But the answer to your question is obviously yes.



Antwort von torti3005:

Because I would recommend you a new camera to buy.
Panasonic NV GS 180/280 Those are very good and are relatively cheap.



Antwort von rtzbild:

For me looks like a picture from youtube, that is very highly compressed ...

Try the following times:

Make Picture With times a function of the photon, then what do you see with the chip is going on.

Then a stop times and a small image in a swing _gut beleuchtetem_ room.

Could be that the video chip just yet "of yesterday" is, but can be synonymous, that the electronic gain is simply too dark.

How are the photos / films in view of the computer monitor?
better or worse than TV?

Olli



Antwort von Axel:

"rtzbild" wrote: For me looks like a picture from youtube, that is very highly compressed ...

The 1:1 screenshot of a video image interlacedten, probably saved as a Jpeg. Make yourself a screenshot times and make it into the net, but says not enough. It is believed in the foliage usgrünliche pixels pile to see if the original is synonymous, I would offer the Camera.






Antwort von highland:

Quote: But the answer to your question is obviously yes.

can be said because if I like movies of quality according to wishes of how zb synonymous in television shows are, I must invest? .. if so, I would with approximately EUR 1500 already can do what? or would have gone over 2000, so this result is achieved?

Quote: Make Picture With times a function of the photon, then what do you see with the chip is going on.
if I have a photo on the sd card render it exactly as in the film .. I just tried habs

Quote: Then a stop times and a small image in a swing _gut beleuchtetem_ room.

synonymous not better ... The picture is grainy

Quote: How are the photos / films in view of the computer monitor?
better or worse than TV?

if the videos in a presentation of 100%, they are exactly as in the TV when I click the full screen size Resolution (1280x1024) pixel are then highly visible



Antwort von Axel:

"Highlander" wrote: I would with approximately EUR 1500 already can do what?
Na klar!
"Highlander" wrote: if the videos in a presentation of 100%, they are exactly as in the TV when I click the full screen size Resolution (1280x1024) pixel are then highly visible
The display over 100% to go, of course, is unfair. Perhaps what HDV is for you.

One suggestion: Go into a small photo shop with your camera. Buy a DV tape and attach them. Make a few test shots with new cams (if you are a charmer you, the seller will be happy you everything anschleppen) and check the recordings at home. Here we can only speculate. An error is a personal test in any case never.



Antwort von highland:

Quote: Perhaps what HDV is for you

I had to synonymous ever thought ...

but would have resulted in better resolution on a standard pal tv noticeable? .. hd quality is not achieved, it is clear ... I think an improvement over a pal camcorders the same price class

I could go with an HD camcorder movies in HD resolution render and still look at pal? or need for one and for the other extra render?

or would be a pal camcorder like this->
http://cgi.ebay.de/Sony-DCR-VX2100-VX-2100-Neu-OVP-vom-Fachhaendler_W0QQitemZ260069865710QQihZ016QQcategoryZ28899QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

like this better than HDV Camcorder

http://cgi.ebay.de/Sony-HDR-HC1-E-5x- MiniDV cassettes pocket-HC-1_W0QQitemZ260069325906QQihZ016QQcategoryZ28899QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

while obviously a price difference of almost 1000 euro to come ...



Antwort von Axel:

Proper consideration.
The old dilemma: the choice can help you diminish None.
HDV can be very good to downkonvertieren IR. Whether the HC1 can, I just do not know exactly, maybe you's says another.



Antwort von highland:

then I will probably look at some unstop time and with his band the dv models FOLDING ...

thank you first for the quick feedback axel! synonymous and thank s.alle other donor tipp !!... I must honestly say that something is rarely the case!

grüße aus nrw



Antwort von rtzbild:

"Highlander" wrote: thank you first for the quick feedback axel! synonymous and thank s.alle other donor tipp !!... I must honestly say that something is rarely the case!

grüße aus nrw

Och but comes several times a day before!

Forest, pure = rausgerufen call.

Olli



Antwort von ///M5-Raser:

Hello!
"If I eg a film was recorded, then I play it on the disk in avi dv codec"
I quite understand, do not have Firewire? If so, I recommend strongly to use Firewire. Has the camera no Firewire port high data rate must be chosen. miniDV uses 25MBit / s.

"to see what we could do better, I have a piece of movie times in only converts mpeg-2 with a resolution of 720 x 576 and a rate of 8000b/sec"
For MPEG2 are 8000 Mbit / s is quite high. But there are many parameters. The results are used by the synonymous program dependent.
Greetings!
Erich



Antwort von highland:

plays on the course with firewire ... The movies are those compression!

So programs like ppro2 or main concept mpeg encoder should already be good enough ... they took me for other conversions have never let down in terms of quality