Infoseite // to realize Search anamorphic lens for Panasonic HDC-SD707 at 1:2.35



Frage von Cinema21:9:


Hi,
I'm new here in the forum and what new synonymous Adapters, Lenses, etc. are concerned.
I want to achieve with my HDC-SD707 a real movie-look without having to somehow in the editing program and the same show via Chromakey black bars.
I have with Google "46mm anamorphic" or "anamorphic HDC-SD707" found no relevant results.
Maybe you could recommend me a cheap solution.

I am very grateful to you in advance
LG
Cinema21: 9

Space


Antwort von JMS Productions:

Does such a thing? So there is an adapter for the SD707 in order to produce an extreme widescreen? I would be interested synonymous.

Space


Antwort von Axel:

Kasche the 16:9 Picture from Cropp, it so that it becomes a 21:9 Picture. First, you will probably not find such an anamorphic lenses, because there is no demand, and secondly you have a camcorder with very good resolution, third-anamorphic lenses are schweineteure formerly Century, now Schneider, from 4:3 to -1:1,33 -> make -1:1,77 16:9 - not durchzoombar and create vignettes in WW nasty (it would otherwise be the same anamorphic lenses with factor 1.333), the mess of the picture quality only, fourth if you were in good company, for a (so-called ) "Cinemascope" movie with nominal 2k resolution (the standard in the modern digital movies), for example, "Avatar" or "Shrek" has 2048x858 pixel resolution. The film, in part, to 25 feet wide screens, and is therefore also gecroppt (based on a "1.8 K" as the one for 2k Comparison 17:9 16:9 cinema format of the call could FullHD this, while proper way, Scope 21, 6 : 9) would be, a fifth, anamorphic 16:9 picture is nowhere Standard. A picture with 1920 x 800 square pixels, you can spend, but on a computer only view.

There are now apparently only the anamorphic lenses for projectors:
http://www.schneiderkreuznach.com/projektion/cd/digitales_heimkino.htm

Space


Antwort von Axel:

"JMS Productions" wrote: "Axel" wrote: Kasche the 16:9 Picture from Cropp, it so that it becomes a 21:9 Picture.

Can you explain this more? What exactly do you mean by example with "abkaschen. 've Never heard this word;)


Was s.Editieren straight. True Movies is in the Scope 1:2,39, but analog Movies is so imprecise that it both with "Cinemascope" - 1:2.35 - 1:2.4 can be equated as synonymous with (as well as one of American Widescreen 1:1,85 without major headaches to make 16:9). So you can with a full HD Picture-a Width of 1920 pixels above and below trim to exactly 140 pixels, so that it has a Height of 800 pixels (1920 ÷ 800 = 2.4). This picture has black bars above and below, since the reference format is 16:9. One could live with the black bar - is there anyway Scope-Play devices do not, and the Philips TV CS also reads from the gecroppten 16:9. Want to be on a PC monitor a Picture without black bars, you have the picture of such gecroppte with a "Free Transform to scale" function in the borderless 16:9 Picture of NLEs (it has a 'distortion factor of 1.35, order another way). Export as "My Size" with 1920 x 800 square pixels then brought you what you want. A post production anamorphic lens so to speak. An optical anamorphic lens uses all 1080 pixels Image height and thus preserved in the gray theory, more quality. A milkmaid account because of bad intentions tuned. Also: What benchmark do you choose? If 1080, the image height, would remain fixed in an anamorphic recording, deceiving the image width 2592 pixels, you would have 725 760 pixels "to" invented, almost as much as 720p. That will give way qualitatively. If the width fixed, everything is running correctly, and you're a Pixelpurist. The more pixels s.gequetschten by an auxiliary lens you would bring nothing but trouble when editing - and no quality increase.
Also for Movies's not like anamorphic rotated. If you do, you can see's on "bokeh": Fuzzy points of light are not circles, but eggs.


Space


Antwort von JMS Productions:

Knotless statement! I'm in between my post edited synonymous, because I use the word "I googled nab" and had thought to find an explanation. This, however, was not nearly as detailed as your ...

That means I have understood correctly, that a convert of me, then 16:9 to 21:9 in theory is useless, even a loss of quality through the elimination of pixels (1920x1080 at a base)? Then I 21:9 format except in Movies and on this particular 21:9 TV but otherwise nothing but bars top and bottom places it would be useful in 16:9 to stay and live with the full number of pixels, right?

The cropping with the loss of quality when I can understand one part, though (by the loss of pixels), the other, but not yet properly understand, because:

If I shoot 16:9 and filming the subject with such a large gap that remains above and below space, which I can then wegcroppen to get the 21:9 format, then that is really no loss of quality in the sense that the subject is so fully mapped and only the unnecessary space is cut away above and below?

Or am I trippin me there now ...

@ Thread Teller: I hope that this conversation is synonymous in your sense, as I have indeed now "brazenly" just clicks in your thread. Sorry;)

Space


Antwort von srone:

to record as little as help position on a sheet paper a 16:9 rectangle, making this by reducing the height of a 21:9 rectangle, centering and to record too, with the camcorder, the zoom rectangle 16:9 full frame, the display then with insulating tape b.thekid recommended or masking tape from the model-making, masking tape so that one only sees the 21:9 rectangle. what you see is what you get a lot of fun while rotating.

lg

SRone

Space


Antwort von iMac27_edmedia:

one can in many other cameras but synonymous Show format, as guides, is to be cut later!

Space


Antwort von srone:

"IMac27_edmedia" wrote: one can in many other cameras but synonymous Show format, as guides, is to be cut later!

I give you right, I think not only camera in the class at issue here is mainly. ;-)

lg

SRone

Space


Antwort von iMac27_edmedia:

well the 707 has only three types of guides, even horinzontal, then a division of the golden section in each 1/3-Unterteilung and then again with a slightly smaller subdivision. But with a little more expensive cameras from Sony, JVC, Canon, Panasonic, it is possible to adjust the guides individually.

As a B-Cam as synonymous C-Cam delivers the 707 a really great Picture!

Space



Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash