Frage von Hessler, Michael:
Hello,
I'm looking _die_ variant. TS.Files (of Dreambox) to reduce;
target reduction factor: approx 3. .7, ie do from 3 GB -> 1 GB to
500 MB. Possibly. I would like to compress synonymous higher, depending on the outcome.
The files are located-as. Geschnitten TS and of Dreambox transferred with
ProjectX-on my hard drive.
With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format
Loss of quality be achieved? Where can I find than with this Beginners
Theme-a comprehensible instructions?
Thank you
Michael
Antwort von Shinji Ikari:
Good day
"Hessler, Michael"
wrote
> I'm looking _die_ variant. TS.Files (of Dreambox) to reduce;
> factor reduction target: approx 3. .7, ie do from 3 GB -> 1 GB to
> 500 MB. Possibly. I would like to compress synonymous higher, depending on the outcome.
> The files are located-as. Geschnitten TS and of Dreambox transferred with
> ProjectX to my hard drive.
and what should happen so later? Which format dominates the
device, d ass to play it again?
> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format
> Loss of quality be achieved?
If there is no longer a question that this box is synonymous to play again
can: H264 delivers (with a few time), good compression.
Antwort von Hessler, Michael:
Hello,
>> I'm looking _die_ variant. TS.Files (of Dreambox) to reduce;
>> Target reduction factor: approx 3. .7, ie do from 3 GB -> 1 GB to
>> 500 MB. Possibly. I would like to compress synonymous higher, depending on the outcome.
>> The files are located-as. Geschnitten TS and of Dreambox transferred with
>> ProjectX to my hard drive.
>
> And what should happen so later? Which format dominates the
> Appliances, d ass to play it again?
Play on PC, if necessary, of Dreambox 7025
>> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format
>> Loss of quality be achieved?
>
> If there is no longer a question that this box is synonymous to play again
> Can: H264 delivers (with a few time), good compression.
What software, what settings?
Have tried Avidemux, but always brings me revised target formats or
Results without sound. DVDShrink I can not run, because a File
Video_Ts.IFO that I do not have.
Greeting
Michael
Antwort von Shinji Ikari:
Good day
"Hessler, Michael" wrote
>> And what should happen so later? Which format dominates the
>> Device, d ass to play it again?
> Play on PC, if necessary, of Dreambox 7025
And what format mastered these devices?
If I FullHD on WinXP PC with Athlon4600 (Socket 939) and CCCP and
Media Player Classic will play, I have to s.and problems
with Rucklern.
If I SD resolution under the same conditions reflected
h264 is not a problem (especially if you really just so low
compressed, as you aspire to).
But now I know not what they may Dreambox / mastered.
Very widespread is synonymous xvid and divx, if there keien
exotic settings out. Even so are so low
Compression quite high image quality.
>>> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format
>>> Loss of quality be achieved?
>> If there is no longer a question that this box is synonymous to play again
>> Can: H264 delivers (with a few time), good compression.
> What software, what settings?
That depends, inter alia, of your operating system, money,
Willingness to manual configuration and tinkering, and possibly
of possible hardware.
Because there are quite many variations, I can not
Detailed information / recommendations.
> DVDShrink I can not run, because a File
> Video_Ts.IFO that I do not have.
TS is not synonymous DVD format.
Antwort von Andreas Erber:
Hessler, Michael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking _die_ variant. TS.Files (of Dreambox) to reduce;
> Factor reduction target: approx 3. .7, ie do from 3 GB -> 1 GB
> To 500 MB. Possibly. I would like to compress synonymous higher, depending on the outcome.
>
> The files are located-as. TS geschnitten and transfer of Dreambox
> With ProjectX to my hard drive.
That would mean possibly in an acceptable format convert. It offers
itself. mpg,. avi or. mkv to.
> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format
> Loss of quality be achieved? Where can I find than with this Beginners
> Topic-an understandable instructions?
Without a clue and halfway useful results would you think if you
a few euros to invest like, with the DivX Converter achieve. Easy
DivX7 load times and the 30 days.
The best results in terms of quality per space is concerned, has
can probably be with a H264 Compression but that includes a few
Pitfalls like that it is not playable and pretty much
CPU power is needed.
The factor of your target is 3-4 but synonymous with DivX or his
Xvid free opponent away. DivX has the advantage of
Simple configuration, Xvid is free and flexible configurable.
As Encodiersoftware can be synonymous in both the free Virtual Dub Tool
use Virtual Dub Mod supports synonymous MEPG2 what you think in this case
probably did exist.
Here is a popular link to the topic: http://german.doom9.org/
Best Regards,
Andy
Antwort von Thomas Einzel:
Shinji Ikari wrote s.15.06.2009 14:38:
...
>> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format
>> Loss of quality be achieved?
>
> If there is no longer a question that this box is synonymous to play again
> Can: H264 delivers (with a few time), good compression.
Is there (s.tatsächlich available) codecs something better / more efficient
than H.264?
Thomas
Antwort von Benjamin Spitschan:
Individual Thomas wrote:
> Is there (s.tatsächlich available) codecs something better / more efficient
> As H.264?
Rather unlikely. Possibly. Dirac. The question is always synonymous, for which
Einsatzzwechk. In the low-end, there is sometimes. Codecs, which at very low
Data rates, the better to mask artifacts.
Otherwise one would have to again the more experimental stuff investigate
Theora etc.
Regards, Benjamin
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
Andreas Erber wrote:
> Virtual Dub Mod supports synonymous MEPG2
The "Mod" is history, since about 3 years, reads the synonymous
original VD MPEG2.
Antwort von Shinji Ikari:
Good day
Thomas single wrote
>>> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format
>>> Loss of quality be achieved?
>> If there is no longer a question that this box is synonymous to play again
>> Can: H264 delivers (with a few time), good compression.
> Is there (s.tatsächlich available) codecs something better / more efficient
> as H.264?
As far as I use it as a layman and for home users personally assess
I can feel H.264 (or x.264) as quite good and
not knowing better. I have not synonymous, but the universal
Ueberblick.
Better in terms of picture quality would possibly MJPEG or play of
Vollbidlern uncompressed, but the more compression
low / not present, in so far is for the task
unrealistic.
It's always a compromise between (subjective) accepted
Desired picture quality and compression.
Antwort von Andreas Erber:
Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
> Andreas Erber wrote:
>
>> Virtual Dub Mod supports synonymous MEPG2
>
> The "Mod" is history, since about 3 years, reads the synonymous
> Original VD MPEG2.
Maybe, but zickt the synonymous with the current version with me in
MPG2 material is always around, especially for DVB-shots.
LG Andy
Antwort von Klaus Behrends:
Hessler, Michael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking _die_ variant. TS.Files (of Dreambox) to reduce;
> Factor reduction target: approx 3. .7, ie do from 3 GB -> 1 GB to
> 500 MB. Possibly. I would like to compress synonymous higher, depending on the outcome.
>
> The files are located-as. Geschnitten TS and of Dreambox transferred with
> ProjectX to my hard drive.
>
> With what tool or what purpose is the smallest format
> Loss of quality be achieved? Where can I find than with this Beginners
> Topic-an understandable instructions?
>
> Thanks
> Michael
First you have to times it clear how long your film is or what
Bitrate he has.
Mpeg as you can in 3 GB in usable quality (2048 kbps) about 3
Hours bring.
That makes ts with a movie easy, fast, free and reliable
VLC with the option Streaming / Exporting.
Gruß Klaus
