Frage von foofighter:
moin
Although've been a bit of the forum durchstöbert but no right answer frauf found:
meanwhile can now almost every digicam a video with 640x480 recording at 30 frames / s.
Digicams that you get for ¬ 110-150 and synonymous SD camcorder with similar properties for something more.
MiniDV right - or DVD camcorder but cost a lot more.
the image quality is so much better or what justifies the high price difference?
I need basically just a nice liquid forming at 640x480 (30f / s).
Many thanks once,
foofighter
Antwort von Videotraum:
What should the final product to be? Internet, DVD, CD?
Antwort von Martin Dienert:
Hello,
probably the most crucial question is what you do with the shoot out. Would you like to s.PC See (or synonymous in the Internet to show) is the format of most cameras (640x480, 30fps) in order. If the television movies with a view (eg a DVD to be created), the format is, particularly the frame rate of 30 fps, unsuitable. How it behaves with flat screens, I can not say.
The target of your SD camcorder with "similar properties" are probably better cameras than camcorders (Aiptek keyword).
SD miniDV camcorder is the cheapest camcorder with which a PAL video (720x576, 25fps interlaced) is accurately recorded.
Another important question is whether and how the films should be processed further. Video from cameras are often already heavily compressed, the picture quality was not necessarily good.
For further processing, DV editing, miniDV is still the first choice (I can only speak of SD).
Furthermore it is important to note the cameras record the images progressively. In fast movements, you can already see. This too is a reason the films of cameras better suited for viewing s.PC are.
In order to assess the difference may be even before I had a few days take a test.
http://forum.slashcam.de/minidv-fotoaparat-mov-ein-vergleich-vt56891.html
Martin
Antwort von foofighter:
hej
first thank for the quick and detailed reply!
So the videos are mainly for the private sector, ie they are mainly s.PC or DVD on the TV show.
why is the frame rate of 30f / s (tubes) TV inappropriate? I had the camera synonymous schonmal s.den directly connected TV set and was actually satisfied (ie for my relationships).
ich hab mir mal such as videos, which you do in the other articles mentioned and did not find as large as the differences lay. :)
I think for my needs of the video features synonymous normal digicams ...
So again thank you!
foofighter
Antwort von Martin Dienert:
Hello,
why is the frame rate of 30f / s (tubes) TV inappropriate? It is outside the norm. If it goes with your television, it is OK, but it must not be with any (especially older) Television fold. And then it would have to check whether the DVD player is playing something, if your preferred software for DVD creation is clearly something, etc. But yes, you can purchase in advance of the test. Sample videos of the cameras are there in the net.
At least when you're in a film of material from the video cameras and camera to use (as in my example), it is complicated. Therefore, I bought the Digiknipse may 25fps.
ich hab mir mal such as videos, which you do in the other articles mentioned and did not find as large as the differences lay. :) That's why I have done so.
I think for my needs of the video features synonymous normal digicams ... Well then a lot of fun :-)
Martin
Antwort von Jan:
the image quality is so much better or what justifies the high price difference?
If you swing a little faster, a lot of image detail prevail MiniDV Camera is the clear advantage. Even when sound is it a clear advantage, because most digicams Wave mono sound only with little response time. MiniDV has a 16 bit 48 kHz uncompressed digital stereo sound.
Many digicams are just at the beginning of the scene once sharp, and the zoom is locked or only the digital zoom is approved.
If an AF Digicam the video has to pump some (especially Kodak) and her extremely out, so that we prefer the AF off.
When the camera optical zoom during video has characterized some strong noises on or off the sound during the Zoomfahrt (eg some Samsung)
Well go do it.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Martin Dienert:
Hello,
apparatus is a photo and is now even a camera. With a video camera can be synonymous yes just a little photography. ;-)
Sometimes it's quite nice of a situation of a little video to have. A film I would with the camera does not rotate synonymous.
The limitations of Jan enumerated, and a few more, my camera synonymous. That is why in my sample movie synonymous not zoomed.
Martin
Antwort von Jan:
I have nothing against Martin.
I was so synonymous times in the garbage can grab that card to full Casio films - unfortunately only 10 minutes max - as was the test of the Casio Martin reported.
Well the great mass, however, can do, with a few exceptions (eg Canon 4 GB with best quality).
VG
Jan
