Frage von wolfgang53:
Hi,
recently I use a wide angle lens (; Canon WD-H37II 0.7x) s.meiner Canon HG 20th
I have the impression that the video recordings fail thus less sharp and much darker.
I thought the camera controls the loss of brightness by prefix auto.
Does anyone have the same combination and could see something similar?
MfG
Wolfgang
Antwort von WideScreen:
If at such Ner Billigscherbe not be avoided ....
Antwort von wolfgang53:
You mean the lens of the camera, the camera in general, or the intent?
Antwort von ruessel:
I have several cameras and several synonymous HD Wide Angle Converter. Loss of light, there is not really (Canon + Raynox intentions), sharpness losses in any case, depending on the selected aperture in the corners are clearly visible (possible so to Aperture F4, so usually the best imaging properties).
Antwort von EdwinAnDerSaar:
Hello!
I use a Raynox HD6600Pro WW-Converter Canon HF100 and s.einer s.Ostern have documented again with some of the station wagon.
As Russell said, the best and sharpest pictures were taken outdoors in sunlight (Aperture F4.0).
The interior shots but this time I get much sharper than s.Weihnachten, but this is more synonymous s.dem s.vorhandenem light. Thus I was able this time with values ranging from F1.8 aperture (open, no gain) and F2.8 very good results that I can not distinguish quality of WW-recordings without premeditation.
However, in my opinion takes the picture quality with WW-Converter decrease rapidly once the electronic amplification (gain) switches. This is possible, I try to avoid or to meter manual.
Eddi
Antwort von shipoffools:
...
The interior shots but this time I get much sharper than s.Weihnachten, but this is more synonymous s.dem s.vorhandenem light. Thus I was able this time with values ranging from F1.8 aperture (open, no gain) and F2.8 very good results that I can not distinguish quality of WW-recordings without premeditation.
However, in my opinion takes the picture quality with WW-Converter decrease rapidly once the electronic amplification (gain) switches. This is possible, I try to avoid or to meter manual.
Eddi Well, since I would be interested but once burning, how will you control for a HF100, if you have the camcorder now gain automatic reingeknallt "" or not.
Just to prevent misunderstandings:
Even if you set in TV mode with shutter 1 / 50 worked and the exposure function (BEL.) manual, the camcorder provides you with normal lighting in the interior with Aperture 1.8 the gain (at a value of 0 BEL.) loose up to +12 dB (or higher). If you wanted to film with this camcorder in normal indoor lighting without gain, you would hardly get a reasonably exposed picture.
I suspect that you can use the BEL. value and the Gainwert (which you control the HF100 is not obvious and set) to one another confusing.
Antwort von Videobodo:
Hello from the Upper Rhine
Even the use of my s.einer VX2100 WW - intent, Canon WD 58 to 0.7 x58 provides some blurred shots. Similarly, a VC 95W Vivanco - 0.5 x52. Probably synonymous, which this occurs varies on the used Camera - Optics. Since helps hold only slightly, if necessary in the post-sharpen,,,,.
Bodo
PS: Manufacturer Vileicht's a refrain, at the additional sales and to curry like a praxisherechte Optics? One can still dream.
Antwort von EdwinAnDerSaar:
Well, since I would be interested but once burning, how will you control for a HF100, if you have the camcorder now gain automatic reingeknallt "" or not.
Just to prevent misunderstandings:
Even if you set in TV mode with shutter 1 / 50 worked and the exposure function (BEL.) manual, the camcorder provides you with normal lighting in the interior with Aperture 1.8 the gain (at a value of 0 BEL.) loose up to +12 dB (or higher). If you wanted to film with this camcorder in normal indoor lighting without gain, you would hardly get a reasonably exposed picture.
I suspect that you can use the BEL. value and the Gainwert (which you control the HF100 is not obvious and set) to one another confusing. Hello!
I work, in fact mostly in TV mode with 1 / 50 shutter. On the exposure mode you can control the aperture values are in fact manual (Photo display by half pressed button) while you have to outsmart the HF100 something.
Detailed instructions can be found here (though for the HV20, but it works well with the HF100, I started using the "double click"):
http://www.feuerwerk-forum.de/showpost.php?s=b1c9ea30b375dad6fefa5b0e6816ef7d&p=224173&postcount=2
Believe it or not, I could shoot in the house in part with (the called function manual preset) Aperture F2.8, without getting too dark a picture. Quite the contrary, it would of white T-shirts usually outshone. Where were no windows in the immediate area, I have with F1.8 (click next to F2.0) hinbekommen synonymous very good shots. That this is not generally true, there should actually be clear.
Greeting
Eddi
Antwort von shipoffools:
@ EdwinAnDerSaar
Somehow you seem to have misunderstood me.
That one in the TV mode on the HF100 and the HV20/30 influence the Aperture and how to control the aperture, is well known.
My answer referred synonymous solely on your above remark
Aperture F1.8 (open, no gain). And as of my writing, you can not read the HF100 Gainwerte (synonymous when one has the function BEL. indirect influence on the gain).
At F1.8, the HF100 is expected to electronic amplification almost always auto switch on (... so nix "no gain").
At the HV30 is any event in Aperture 1.8 almost always gain active. (The Gainwerte the HV20/30 can be via Firewire port s.PC using "HDVdataMon read.")
So not confuse Aperture and Gain ...
