Frage von ich33:
Hello
(sorry for the title, do not know how scarce ichs better answer is to express)
teste grade Final Cut Pro 6 and have discovered what annoying if I have a similar effect, or on a clip in the timeline to apply again when I get to play in the canvas only a black image with the writing "is not rendered" to be seen. after I've rendered it synonymous is everything back in order.
I am merely of premiere cs3 accustomed Request that all my effects, fade, etc. are already using preview to see that I do not only what must render.
grade in color, etc. It is very important to me ne quick uncomplicated vorschau to have something without the need to render. every time something would render s.zeit consume.
system:
Unibody MacBook Pro
2.53 GHz, 4 gb ram
leopard 10.5.6
Final Cut Pro 6.0.5
Antwort von Babaluba:
There are at the top left of the timeline, a button is on the RT. As times and press it to "unlimited real-time" and change to Not with the other settings there are, for example, to "dynamically" switch!
good luck! Lg
Antwort von Britta Leuchner:
exactly. Final Cut works for "dynamic" on the basis of the Calculator on your available resources and that's synonymous a good thing, because otherwise you would have without your ad may render every time you have the effects and their computation underestimates a possible crash or freezing etc. .. So as of my predecessors described the Prüfansicht not claim too much and by switching to dynamically throttle back a bit, because Final Cut Pro at a higher cost then the display quality can dynamically adjust.
If you are not the absolute monster machine and did an extremely good graphics card and hardware etc, you should be in applications of this kind always seek a balance of performance and verifiability are looking for. Moreover, often the very simple rule: "Good thing Will have now" - and in film processing quality processes can not just be implemented in a way. But dat weisste certainly eh ...
In addition, I have accustomed myself for longer stays s.einer second or third Effekteintellung the former Effects out (bypass) I used to do the test do not necessarily need. That helps enormously synonymous in response to mouse gestures, or the quick click-stop play-and-edit process, if you beigroßen projects are not everything in slow motion to make.
But believe me with Final Cut Pro are you a great deal next with a premiere. Look especially the additional tools such as Color and Motion exact times etc s.and take ne week for it. It's worth it because the time Holst then you loose again!
Liebe Grüße
Antwort von Axel:
For a control of the motion (animation, etc.), it is good, the RT setting to "dynamic" to toggeln. For a color correction is the full quality sometimes more important. But anyway then please do not render, but RT-toggeln.
Not rendered does not mean that one sees
nothing. The (a) frame, where the play head is parked, will be displayed fully synonymous. That's enough, really, once there's real time only with additional hardware, and it was never necessary. We are just spoiled.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Keyword "monster machine" on our new Mac Pro (8x2.26, 12 GB, Radeon 4870) makes cutting a pleasure. As is almost everything in HD in real time. Feels good. Unfortunately eiert Final Cut Pro forum and uses only one-two of the eight cores. Compressor but you get via "Quick Cluster" means really 95% of all eight cores (!) To use. That's cool. Motion is also very good - thanks to the good graphics card. The stuff has to be more s.die new i7 architecture (up to 16 threads) to be adjusted. If the Programs in the next few years, get all the cores to exploit, this is all much better. To date, eight cores only an investment in the future, which in future would have been cheaper.
Antwort von Britta Leuchner:
Well, only if the program will finally come and 8 cores are able to use, they are already synonymous to many things in other areas have developed, where they ultimately then at least 12 cores would need to with all these updates then turn around to run. :-))) That's how it is with the eternal nunmal not parallel the evolving course of events in the technology.
Thus, the rule: Never change a running system, but only s.long s.it is good enough to be better than optimal. :-)))
Regards
