Frage von Zizi:
Hello people!
I want to get a little something in the art Steadycam Flycam as / Glidecam / merlin, etc.
Cost, is less than 300 ¬ ..
What do you say to this "system"?
http://cgi.ebay.at/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=180499783609&_trkparms=tab% 3DWatching
Are the Flycam 5000 at all suitable for a 5D and 550D + ² max 1kg Optics (yes together max. 2kg) or what but less better?
A vest is a iensätze VDSLR for short but not necessary anyway?
I have never worked with the small things, therefore it is difficult to say how the work in contrast to a large RICHITGE?
Videos on the net to see very much case out of it at a flat rate to have a Picture!
Antwort von pilskopf:
So if ne Glidecam, then a Glidecam HD-2000, the 1000 does not work. Being synonymous with a Tokina 11-16 ne 1000 goes even if the 545gr. I have to agree ergoogelt. How much is the more times the 550s?
I do not know if I would buy an Indian, because I would rather buy a classic original, the synonymous well designed and prof. looks like and which retains a certain synonymous resale value. And the Merlin I find not as mobile as a Glidecam, which can easily be used optimally because of the construction and can be adjusted child in pretty good speed, 2 wheel which can rotate minimal needs when you have assembled it, and use it a spacer should be when they put together. Without the Merlin have ever had in my hand I know that the Glidecam for many shooting situations, the better choice by their construction. And cheaper it is synonymous, which would have to adjust more easily to be synonymous with the Glidecam.
Recently a colleague asked me to borrow my Glidecam for its 5d, I weigh that had finished in 5 minutes when we had taken a Lens Canon 50mm 1.4 and it went quite well with the weight, very good, I had not thought of. He had a 900 gram WW synonymous here, I've flagged the same, that will not do, like this together is 1.3 kilos for the HD-1000 limit, they should brace 1.4 yes. No idea if this value is only what has to do with the balances or if sent at the physically no longer hinhaut, no idea.
Antwort von Zizi:
How much is the more times the 550s?
I put more on the 5D and weighs 800g without lens .. the
550 is probably the hardest Lens 500g what would come to would insert a 85mm 1.2 (together then max 1.8kg), but usually a 24mm, 50mm 300g ~
But both are just as fine as with the steady ;-)
The Glidecam anywhere where I can find and then when the part will cost almost the double of the Flycam!
Is not almost identich Flycam?
The resale value of me is pretty no preference for the more especially as the talks Flycam model because I buy so even needed ..
It is important that the part actually carries out his quiet work .. if the Flycam can just as well as the Glidecam but this would certainly be better?
Merlin is not in anyway ask .. does not necessarily better and cost you much mistaken!
Antwort von pilskopf:
Forget about a 85mm. Wide-angle, possibly even a 50 but for '85 the only one in the rarest case, and then something that is probably more of a luck recording with turning high focal lengths is extremely difficult, a bit Focal synonymous but can look very cool. Fixing you prefer to small focal lengths, one 50 or 30 is better suited and one for the very small focal lengths, I had a 550s, I would want the Tokina 11-16mm. This should be with the Crop bombe Glidecam for beautiful shots. to turn the tele is already badly designed I comment. Have I made a table tennis scene times and am a little run around looking, genial but turn out to be as accurate is quite difficult because one must not use the jab because almost every mistake we immediately see.
Glidecam is only of http://www.marcotec-shop.de/de/index.htm in Germany, dealer.
The big difference will be the adjustment, the Flycam will compete more with the normal Glidecam 2000 or you can fine-tune the Flycam synonymous with such small wheels?
No matter what the suspension system, the exact adjustment would have the most important factor in a Steadicam be because it only works correctly when it was adjusted correctly and that you can synonymous. Most bad shots come in the network of poorly and incorrectly adjusted Steadis, handling of false to say nothing but that's usually all alone With the time of, each has made s.Anfang so stupid, as usual.
Antwort von Zizi:
Yes I do realize that .. I usually then turning well anyway with a 17,24,35,50 mm would be only 85 in the extreme case!
But my 24er weighs 500g of thus synonymous synonymous already had enough on it last (1.5kg)!
In any case, my Glidecam things are too expensive!
¬ 250 for a rich on Ebay should.
The principle is Fly, Glidecam but the same except for some small processing characteristics?
And where is the difference between Glidecam Pro and HD?
Alternatives to the two particular Priced Gibts nix?
Antwort von pilskopf:
So I can tell you the same, turn the switch as easy Lens and is not, as you have exact weights hang up or take off again, perhaps gleichzeiteig extend the pole, again finely adjusted to roughly adjust because the lens is suddenly a gross weight forward. Imagine that just not too easy before, you'll be lucky if you ever get a decent lens with only one calibration point and then go do you want. Imagine not just not too easy to occur and the saving s.end s.der body that drives you later when you Rotate in the madness and turn in vain to give up because the shots do not work, or at least not in the quality that you like have done. For me, the choice would be more than clear. I take the device that is mature and finely adjusted extremely well because it matters to be really good and especially to get perfect shots.
The U'nterschied between Derr and the Pro HD is the fine adjustment by small wheel with which you can move the upper plate.
Antwort von Zizi:
The U'nterschied between Derr and the Pro HD is the fine adjustment by small wheel with which you can move the upper plate.
the Flycam, the synonymous but I believe?
at least you can see at the 5000 such a wheel ..
Well I have no idea .. still had never been a "steady"?
'm A little confused ..
As I said to myself, the haptics no preference .. a quiet ride must succeed!
Used the thing is just often synonymous nciht!
I will wahrscheinlihc eh mainly set on the 17-35mm zoom and 5D of so if it were more likely less of a problem with the adjustment. But thanks for the tip. .'m The one that would last before or push back.
offer Dudas think Ebay is kake?
Since'd still such a "jacket" is actually sound and 250 ¬ bilig?
Antwort von Zizi:
aja I would be so much more interested in whether 1kg weight (WW + 550D) for a Flycam 5000 is not too little?
gibts there not to make a minimum weight for clean rides?
Antwort von pilskopf:
So that is indeed huge, really huge, look at what Cam is there on it. The must already own a lot of weight. Consider just the potential for very small and light cam and not even with this small radius does not happen to turn. How often do I come against my own already and that is very short, with a long pole and turn his great Steadicam one must still cautious when.
