Frage von deti:
http://www.heise.de/ct/artikel/Scheibe-statt-Rolle-862196.html
Deti
Antwort von Axel:
All this does not surprise me. In the movies, where I work, has since "Fantasia 2000" (then 1k) has always been a digital projector, for some years even two, and the two largest halls to be recorded.
The annual event, "children's film in the movies - KiK" is regularly taken from us very well. Many films will be visited of 300-400 children. The copies are of old scrap, consisting only of splices (jump cuts), and tread are rained out. The Digitaltonspur - if there is - is so worn that only a bumpy analog sound (record is scratched listen) to. By the end of film I like to go into the lobby and hear how excited the film was taken by its layer of defectiveness. Their faces glow.
If I myself have the chance, I watch a movie at a cinema, which has seen its day, technically since approximately thirty years.
By that I stamp my own well-nostalgic for the movies. I'm still open to new techniques opposite, but do not see any added value to the same BD disc (whether of BD as JPEG2000 or the server that is a marginal difference) at home, surrounded only popcorn munching moronic synonymous (the art-house audience at to see so much more fun). So geht das
With the new techniques (especially 3D) but only revived the old recipes. Would be nice if we could say that today's movies-makers had Standing on the shoulders of giants (Cameron himself says this in a making of about modern movies). I think the Comparison a presumption: Here to talk not dwarfs, but the course head.
Antwort von Kino:
The result surprised me not synonymous. If I project with one 4kw flask on six meters canvas, I bring the best festival copy to fading.
Will emerge with frequent wear and play do not necessarily lead to a deterioration of the movie experience should I have lately learned, when I mark the twentieth anniversary of the Wall Film Series with a little sun avenue, Good Bye, Lenin, and was The Lives of Others.
Coupled with the nostalgic atmosphere of my house all the ideas were well attended and left satisfied visitors clear (the pixel count were not even). Yet my heart bled when I saw the condition of the repertoire of copies at delivery. Here are the esteemed colleague and logistics services rendered in the interest of rapid digitalization all the work.
Antwort von pilskopf:
So we just had to after 1 weeks "to exchange the white tape" because the copy was of such poor material that works only the analog sound was terrible, programmed complaints were, we were able to show the film only once, very quietly because the sound otherwise only a noise if someone had spoken. Ne DTS is no longer produced or only rarely, at least in the movie what would have been but the DTS gabs not considered so, therefore, had to be ne new copy. Second Duie now runs better and has so far no sign of wear.
Somehow, I'd be glad wenns so is digital, then stop taking any other problems arise and we are basically a defect in the Digital Projetors can not resolve itself as opposed to a 35mm cucumber, in the Projektionist can change rapidly times a V-belt and the plunger changes.
What I do not know myself digitally, you can coil back to the movie? (At the function I rejoice then). : D Or is synonymous back then digitally programmed such that one has to Keion justified? We used to have a 3D performance test for the distribution chief Katzenberg in our house. Therefore, the extra one silver screen have drawn the synonymous to this day still hangs (Arrg!). The film could almost not be started because the access codes have been missing. Since it could not even help the Katzenberg.
At least it will be a few home-made errors no longer exist. That example was not cut out to a premiere distributor logo or the Act 7 as an act 5 was put into the film and this at a premiere.
Our 8 halls but all are still analog and I'm glad each time when the Projektionist radioed "film has flown from the plate, takes 20 minutes. : D
Antwort von domain:
Will emerge with frequent wear and play do not necessarily lead to a deterioration of the viewing experience, must, I have recently heard ....
The internal noise filter of the brain are really phenomenal. The first few seconds you can see the scratches and dust filled and hear more noise than signal in the sound, but if the content is captivating eliminated very quickly and everything detrimental it is the pure concentrate on the essentials.
Antwort von Axel:
The internal noise filter of the brain are really phenomenal. The first few seconds you can see the scratches and dust filled and hear more noise than signal in the sound, but if the content is captivating eliminated very quickly and everything detrimental it is the pure concentrate on the essentials. Not only that digital movies are still movies, is still a "film", unless the context darkened room - a projected light - volatile impressions - extralarge the draft - are to remain and stay conscious. The voluntary self-evaluate engagement of the viewer to a subject is higher than the perfection of the show. And Beyond: Is the
show perfect, there is only the overthrow of the viewer. And must every time the previous "benchmark" outperform, or is a boredom. Luckily modern films are synonymous still retain something of the origin of cinema, the year of market-pleasure, the somewhat frivolous play with the light. I hope that there will be next synonymous.
Finally, there is no preference as to whether we take the contents of a book by a papery printed product, an audio book or an e-book. The nostalgic for its 25 volumes of Brockhaus with gold trim, which quickly become outdated, this is all ridiculous conservatism. "There is no preference" means synonymous but: Bloss because a film is technically much better than a fifty years older, he can still be very much worse (and it is often). And conversely, if a film only through the ravages of time "is completely in the ass, takes the" internal noise filter of the brain ", the" content attracts "continues.
Antwort von joe11:
I'm not surprised the experiment.
The order in terms Resolutionwar in the 80s:
Movies, TV, computer, video.
Meanwhile, it is with HDTV and BR as follows:
Computer, video, movies, TV
With the future UHDTV and 4k movies might happen:
Computer, TV, movies, video
Perhaps these four media will eventually get the same Resolutionspendiert.
Addendum: The first cars were slower than horses. Even with a lame horse would have been able to overtake them.
