Frage von deti:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Ruckel-Movies-unerwuenscht-Cameron-wuenscht-sich-mehr-als-24-Bilder-pro-Sekunde-909547.html
Deti
Antwort von RickyMartini:
It's like computer / video games - first s.60fps movements appear fluid properly (based on 60Hz displays).
This "Flüssigekeitsgrenze" Of varies game to game. This is a game with some still quite well playable 20fps, while Game B, despite sluggish 35fps appear.
In racing games and FPS games, this effect can be observed quite well.
Therefore appear to us at 1080p60 video as particularly desirable.
Antwort von Alf_300:
one more reason to finally get 640k Calculator without limit from the drawer
Antwort von tom:
he'd wish you had
Antwort von Axel:
According to its own statements, Cameron was already turning his 3-D film "Avatar" at 48 frames per second, but had failed for financial reasons that - after all must have CGI sequences with double frame rate for rendering. I understand that. The biggest film of the decade, the most successful of rotated and now the most influential film makers of all time, could not saddle this whole Renderei
still synonymous. Since he has probably grudgingly said: Okay, then again just exceptional 24th
Have not already 48 B / s are rendered in 3D?
Thus, the digital cinema standard of DCI, although a mode with 48 frames per second, but this is Resolutionmöglich - intended only for 2D material and spatial images at 2K by 4K Resolutionsind effectively only 24 frames per second. The specification? Oh, yes, which of course is a real obstacle. While each week will be changes, additions and adjustments made in the form of updates and upgrades, partly synonymous of hardware, but
the frame
rate? "Who cares? Cameron? Who's `s that? Since everyone can come.
And 2D 2k 48 B / s have been implemented? Damn, why try it ninth out? Too expensive, I think. Well known film material for analog and digital recording disks are by far the largest cost for a movie. And then - gulp! Be - indeed must be
rendered still synonymous. Jesse, I feel quite dizzy when I think s.den entire rendering stream. With 48 fps you need on a render farm probably in the winter no hot water bottle. But: What do you do in summer?
Cameron's word carries weight in the industry: After all, he is responsible not only for the presumably lucrative future movie of all time, but synonymous with "Titanic" for the former. Together, the two productions have been provided for a turnover of more than 3.5 billion U.S. dollars s.den box office. Peanuts for shareholders and brokers. They do not want to squander all the loot right back. Doubling the frame rate! It would be better to replace all
of the means of production in such a
radically new technology?
Much hope is s.Avatar indeed a higher framerate. The reasons for a new postponement of 48 B / s probably lies elsewhere. Very often see 24 B / s from simply better, not only because we're used to. Still would have to be for Cameron ( "like ordering s.Starbuck 's") is no impediment: With 48 frames per second can be synonymous scene as needed crank down to 24 fps or even 12, as do editors to to emphasize movement and still make the action part of liquid.
