Frage von monikagrun:
Hello,
excuse, is probably a simple and silly question, but I want to avoid problems.
So I have a short film in 16:9 rotated. So the camera properly umgstellt to 16:9, not simply more space above and below left for later after drüberzulegen artificially beams.
If I now want to cut the material to digitize, and Premiere Pro, I think I will have to create a project instead of a 4:3 Letterbox Project.
BUT:
Then I will make the final product as a DVD, not only with the film, but synonymous a making of, photos from the shooting, interview, and then next, is it advisable to digitize the film to 4:3 and stretch it to 16:9 for to output it as 4:3 movie to give it to the otherwise 4:3 DVD?
Has not everyone even a 16:9 TV
Sorry for the maybe stupid question, but I will indeed learn.
Thank you
Monika
Antwort von Markus:
If I now want to cut the material to digitize, and Premiere Pro, I think I will have to create a project instead of a 4:3 Letterbox Project. No, you set up a 16:9 Project, if you want to edit or capture 16:9. But you have taken synonymous 16:9 and not the cheap 4:3-version with black bars (=) letterbox, right?
Then I will make the final product as a DVD, not only with the film, but synonymous a making of, photos from the shooting, interview, and then next, is it advisable to digitize the film to 4:3 and stretch it to 16:9 for to output it as 4:3 movie to give it to the otherwise 4:3 DVD? Long question, short answer: No, it is not.
Has not everyone even a 16:9 TV Never mind. The DVD tells the DVD player is available in what format the video, and while the player knows the format of the connected TV. The player knows in case of discrepancy itself, what to do then. ;-)
With short 16:9 - and 4:3-sections Check whether your DVD-authoring software can work with mixed formats! Some can not ... the fact
Perhaps a few more details about 16:9 and 4:3? Maybe you can then assess what it would mean that convert one format to another ... See
The 16:9 widescreen has the exact same Resolutionwie one 4:3-Picture
Antwort von rush:
hi monika,
because it deals with a short film, but you could be the compatibility of both the 16:9 as synonymous synonymous pack a 4:3 dvd enabled version of the ... then the "consumer consumption," if select format in each instance the possibility to the right (he can begin to understand something with the ....)
And as long as enough space for both variants is on the dvd ...
And as mentioned earlier, I would be synonymous capture in 16:9 and cut as well!
Antwort von Markus:
... both the 16:9 as synonymous pack a 4:3 dvd enabled version of the ... What sense does it make?
Antwort von aaVe:
And as mentioned earlier, I would be synonymous capture in 16:9 and cut as well! servus,
I'm synonymous nen young short-film in 16:9 was added, synonymous to create a 16:9 project in premiere pro 2.0, capture, however, is not correct, because the pc always hang and all the jerky ... as it is when I am a 2nd Connect screen will ... but that doing so might not matter. 4:3, I can capture only just super, because nothing is synonymous jerky and the pc is not synonymous to, but just at 16:9. is perhaps the s.pc (ie, computational power), I (nen AMD Athlon 64 3000 +, 1024 MB ram ...) or is somehow s.programm?
hope you can help me ...
mfg aave
Antwort von beiti:
I'm synonymous nen young short-film in 16:9 was added, synonymous to create a 16:9 project in premiere pro 2.0, capture, however, is not correct, because the pc always hang and all the jerky ... as it is when I am a 2nd Connect screen will ... but that doing so might not matter. 4:3, I can capture only just super, because nothing is synonymous jerky and the pc is not synonymous to, but just at 16:9. is perhaps the s.pc (ie, computational power), I (nen AMD Athlon 64 3000 +, 1024 MB ram ...) or is somehow s.programm? 16:9 need as much computing power as 4:3. But this needs
much more computing power, which is HDV. Could it be that you are confusing it? What camcorder do you use?
Antwort von aaVe:
Hi,
I am not confusing the ne. I have the panasonic NV-GS 180 EG-S, 4:3 capture is so synonymous indeed good.
mfg aave
Antwort von beiti:
Then I am somewhat perplexed synonymous. For your normal computer hardware should at least be more than sufficient. Whether 4:3 or 16:9 is still only a question of labeling, the Resolutionist indeed the same.
I've recorded with Premiere 6.0 on an Athlon 800 (!), Both 4-3 as synonymous 16:9 without any problems.
Do you have the capture time with other software tries, such as the trial of
Antwort von aaVe:
Hi,
okay people, I've tried twice, while the draufzuspielen latest graphic drivers of nvidia, and because it was synonymous with other programs with errors of presentation, the problem is now solved by the driver update! ty @ all;)
mfg aave
