Frage von mytohuwabohu:
Hello,
following problem: I have a HD 1920x1080 px image sequence with square pixels from afterFX off, which I for further editing in premiere cs3 would like to import.
standard in the project settings is one such project but not created. it is only through custom settings> edit mode> desktop. then you can get the frame size and the pixel aspect ratio setting. and that is only in this editing mode "desktop". However, needs in these settings each rendering immensely long, with the result of both the rendered preview of exported as synonymous sequences looks like with only 256 colors or something (at least abnormally bad). it can not work, something is not right ..
synonymous but after much Googling reveals that I do not, what's wrong and I do not understand what the edit mode "desktop" because is supposed to be?
meanwhile, I have found that I get good results when I use a predetermined (but not the one I want to project setting (1440x1080 px anamorphic) do - with the same footage ..
can someone tell me, what's wrong, what processing mode "desktop" is like me and with a project with square pixels can work? or whether all about - or whether premiere here with me right patronized ..?
that would be super!
many thanks!
Antwort von s2kk:
Hello,
I do not know what you all in After Effects've done, but (mostly), you can complete the project without it before in AE to render after importing Premiere .. So basically the project file directly.
Works for me in any case always without problems.
MfG Sascha.
Antwort von mytohuwabohu:
.. well, this could already go .. s.eigentlichen but the problem nothing will change, because it is me yes to the project settings in premiere. and because it is no preference as to whether footage of me somewhere, or directly from after fx import.
So I would like to know what project> Custom Settings> Edit Mode> desktop is the problem and whether the causes that I 1920 px (square pixel) in 1440 instead of px wide (anamorphic) wants ..? you can only create a custom setting on the editing mode> desktop set?
Antwort von Markus:
However, needs in these settings each rendering immensely long, with the result of both the rendered preview of exported as synonymous sequences looks like with only 256 colors or something (at least abnormally bad). What did you regard as file and codec set? In addition to the image size (1920 × 1080 pixels) and the framerate (25 fps) are yes with the most important targets with the largest influence on the resulting image quality.
Antwort von mytohuwabohu:
.. So I have mentioned under the conditions of the choice between 'Video for Windows' uncompressed-10 bit' and 'uncompressed bit-8' ... I tried it with almost all codecs under 'Video for Windows', so Cinepak, Indeo, divx. microsoft 1, uncompressed .. each the same or similar bad results ..
more I can not set ..
However, if I load a project requirement, is the setting in 'video-rendering' I-frame only MPEG-2 and may not be synonymous. With these settings the system works, however great.
only I would just like to know why I am not my project with 1920 square pixels can create and then doing synonymous - to me seems no logical reason ..
furthermore, it would be great if someone could explain to me why only custom settings with the default "desktop" to make and what these settings mean ..? which has a premiere project with desktop setting to be done?
Antwort von Markus:
... I tried it with almost all codecs under 'Video for Windows', so Cinepak, Indeo, divx. microsoft 1, uncompressed .. The fact that the ancient Cinepak Codec nothing sensible comes out, is absolutely logical. However, there would have been a marked difference in the "uncompressed" show them.
Could it be that not even the image quality is poor, in the file is saved, but only (!) The picture output is not optimal? How does the file from which you render from AE? And do you use for the export function or the Render Queue?
Antwort von mytohuwabohu:
Render Queue .. .. I have a jpg image sequence with 100% quality rausgerendert .. 1920 x 1080 pixel ..
the video output is not optimal? what do you mean?
what kind of format / codec could be because this resolution with square pixels represent? this is a general problem or only in the premiere?
So the program forcing me indeed, 1440x1080 anamorphic pixel nehemen to .. has a certain logical basis?
try it out when you apply a project, as in the first description specified .. if not then synonymous works .. In fact, for such a test the footage yes no preference ..
Antwort von Markus:
Render Queue .. .. I have a jpg image sequence with 100% quality rausgerendert .. 1920 x 1080 pixel .. Using the Render Queue is correct. JPEG is a lossy compression, but at the maximum quality setting should not be the cause.
the video output is not optimal? what do you mean? I mean that in the first place, if necessary, the presentation of the graphics card vermurkst and not the video editing program or its project settings. Currently, I have yet no further evidence.
what kind of format / codec could be because this resolution with square pixels represent? this is a general problem or only in the premiere? I have high definition projects already realized with Premiere 6.5. Suitable format such as AVI uncompressed or use of a Lossless codecs such as HuffYUV. A problem in the sense I could not find, however, requires some basic knowledge to make the right adjustments. My previous attempts also ended up with (albeit low) quality losses. A certain learning by trial & error is normal.
So the program forcing me indeed, 1440x1080 anamorphic pixel nehemen to .. has a certain logical basis? Perhaps depends on the chosen file from? Not every format can be with any codecs combine. - You try this but hopefully with a new Project and not with one, in whose timeline is already contents are? Perhaps such a thing leads to restrictions in the choice?
try it out when you apply a project, as in the first description specified .. if not then synonymous works .. In fact, for such a test the footage yes no preference .. I have as I said with Premiere 6.5 made much earlier.
Antwort von mytohuwabohu:
.. So first thank you for your reply ..!
maybe it's really my graphics card that everything is not as quite packed .. because now I stand before the next problem. and although I wrote the prorgramm with increasing fill the project more and more faulty preview files .. that is, suddenly in between the pictures are black or the image 'jumps'. primarily s.komplexeren cut back wherever rausgeschnitten are individual frames.
sometimes can fix this by getting the render files to delete, but now he writes to me synonymous with each re-render again synonymous with new bug in the preview.
the only solution to this problem is for me until now, have already cut to export sequences to be with them in a new project to continue. everything else somehow not out skin. namely, the export works fine.
to a jpg image sequence: So I have several formats Tested and compared with each other (tiff, png, jpg). jpg cuts at 100% quality is not worse than the other two formats, but at the same time consumes much less memory .. therefore, the choice to jpg.
.. and with the 1440x1080 anaamorph I said of course, a new project - and there is no other possibility, where s.vorlagen ..
Antwort von Markus:
maybe it's really my graphics card that everything is not as completely packed ... Your further description, it seems to detours to work now, right?
It may still not hurt the system requirements of Premiere Pro CS3 times with this PC to compare to detect any weaknesses.
Antwort von mytohuwabohu:
.. yes, works ..
but again only on complex and detours funny .. I mean - not that I would not normally - but would be synonymous times beautiful, if so what right would fold as you would imagine;)
