Frage von (PFR)Camman:
Hi,
25p when I scan with the SonyHDR-FX1000 had filmed ... the material with Adobe Premiere Pro CS4 for a clip cut together .... and then have rendered all ..... do I have something to do before exporting so that I get smooth video?
Thank you
MfG C.
Antwort von r.p.television:
Smooth video and 25p are opposites. If you do not want to have jerky video movies with 50i or 50p.
Export settings are nothing euphemistically.
Antwort von (PFR)Camman:
Yes schän and good .... but the whole is probably not technically the Super Gau ... his world is not as yet determined yet what to make of it .... the clip is also exclusively for Internet video platforms thought.
Antwort von Axel:
Double threads are rightly frowned upon. Delete the neighboring thread.
rp television has (exceptionally)
not right. 25p is in most cases better than 50i. For recording, there is only "HDV" (ie "i"), but for the timeline, the default read "HDV 1080 25p" - or similar. If s.Premiere CS3 or Final Cut Pro 5.1.4.
It is important that the shutter of Recording on 1/50tel or 1/25tel selected. Then there is, with the correct preset, no bucking synonymous. With shorter Shutterzeiten and the right preset, there are
slight bucking
without the correct preset is always jerky - unbearable.
Export settings 25p then of course, as always, it would be "p" was.
EDIT: In Slashcam camcorder-Comparison puts it, the Camera:
Friends of the progressive 25p recording also come at their expense: The built-CMOS chips can be motives with 25 frames per second scan. For compatibility reasons, however, converts Sonydie images (unlike Canon) before storage on the HDV tape in 50i format. This provides for a more compatible in editing applications, the pure 25P-streams do not know, but synonymous for more effort when the half back in the editing program must merge. Very confusing, because I do not believe that the treatment makes a difference. 25p (with CMOS sensor progressively scanned) for HDV must always divided into two fields are written. No matter. Try it reports.
Antwort von (PFR)Camman:
Ok Thanks. Sorry for the double thread.
The Project I have a 1080p opened and filmed in cinema 1/25tel with preset shutter.
Now I try to grade various export settings from the Media Encoder.
Thank you
One more thing:
How is the Internet for clips.
I can so when Youtube upload huge files (1GB), so I could theoretically the original data using the camera (to the 25 Mbit / s) ... but I think the clip then invites one to two years if he wants to watch. ...
But if I with 7 Mbit / s, then export the video is muddy ....
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Hi,
25p recordings can be a bit jerky when it swings too quickly or when fast movements come into play. I've just run a larger project, I am there because of the extra light on Aperture 25p gone. The most important thing is the attitude maintained throughout the Project, except perhaps in truly static scenes. Otherwise, the picture gets quite a different pattern, and this may annoy.
After DVD Export seems only marginal anyway Jerkiness to be much weaker.
BG
Andreas
Antwort von (PFR)Camman:
That turns my whole problem. Time, aside from the beginning, I do not think that I am the camera move too quickly, the movement of the athlete and the washy, I think in order.
Did not someone know how I make it a smooth clip whose picture do not look like once the cocoa pulled?
Antwort von Axel:
1. Great clip. Zurek is also an extremely tasty bread soup. Instead of dry bread to the ducks (ducks bread is Ententod!), So you can easily prepare a dish, so some porn cook can look bland - and thus saves your wallet, more equipment for video remains. It depends on the contents, and the true.
2. The video is not choppy, choppy s.and to
you. More "jumping" of the image does not come from the "p" mode, but by the encoder. Optimal encoder settings for YouTube links are here somewhere.
3. If you are in front of a railing, you use manual focus. That is the reason why the film is partially blurred.
4. I know that it always means that 'p' only 1/25tel. Sounds logical, because yes video has no aperture sector and so the motion blur is exactly proportional. For some reason, but 1/50tel mE much better. Jerky still not synonymous smears but not so fast (so please do not dispute the principle).
Antwort von (PFR)Camman:
Hey Thanks.
(And this agrees with the soup ^ ^)
Antwort von r.p.television:
rp television has (exceptionally) not right. 25p is in most cases better than 50i. But since we would be yes but dispute the principle ;-)
Did not wish to 25p filmmakers before pushing the head, but many are surprised because of Ruckelei. 25p video looks so rarely as for chemical film. With the soft Motionblur by the circulation of the film camera aperture affects much organic as progressive video - synonymous with a shutter speed between 1 / 25 and 1 / 50.
For a full exploitation of the Internet may currently 25p better. Hence, Axel rather that I did wrong.
Antwort von Axel:
@ rptelevision
In addition, the deinterlacer of "i" - no preference whether the output device or in the Postpro - a shaky camera work such as in "The Wall" is still something laminated. Conversely, that Wobbler in motion only 25 phases are emphasized. These are the familiar arguments for interlaced, as they take on, and so it is not synonymous dispute.
