Frage von WWJD:
Hi Folks
As far as I know, the format 350er in 1440, so not full HD.
If the difference is visible, ask because I for an exhibition
Video recordings should be produced, which then with a (hopefully) full-HD beamers are projected.
What do you think?
Thanks for answers
Gruss Saamjo
Antwort von Anne_trister:
I guess the times no problem is
because it already synonymous better HDV cams
very good.
gruß cj
Antwort von Pianist:
As far as I know, the format 350er in 1440, so not full HD.
If the difference is visible, ask because I for an exhibition
Video recordings should be produced, which then with a (hopefully) full-HD beamers are projected.
What do you think? You've given the wrong idea: The Picture is not small or narrow, but it is part of the XDCAM HD codecs as synonymous to the HDCAM codec, just squashed horizontally when recorded and playback equalize. So you make it more like a 16:9 anamorphic picture in the normal PAL world.
To your real question: In a direct comparison can be seen in fact that real images with 1920x1080 pixels (Ikegami Editcam HD) look sharper, but really only in direct comparison. On the other hand are then suddenly synonymous recordings a Panasonic HDX-900 or a SonyHDW-730 HD-Optics, despite muddy that we just kept perfectly still. If you like only a 350er available and so that all the shots you turn, you will make sure to reasonable results, but this camera is far away of the upper class, mainly because of the chips and the Compression. Think especially tuned to the noise behavior in dark colored catastrophic.
Matthias
Antwort von Anne_trister:
hallo matthias,
you have the Ikegami Now and if so
how are the first experience in the practice?
gruß cj
Antwort von Pianist:
hallo matthias,
you have the Ikegami Now and if so
how are the first experience in the practice? The experiences are as I have already suspected: Genial good. Very nice work and perfect quality. Now, only the weather is better.
Matthias
