Frage von niles:
I now have one years since my SonyHandycam 1-chip
But since I was just too bad the picture quality.
So I want to migrate to a 3CCD camera.
However, my budget is again very small.
700 - max. 800 euro
Do we get to what rational?
The image quality should be good and indeed synonymous after capturing and burn to DVD. So at least for TV.
And the camera should not be synonymous shot, say 3-4 years, they should hold in any case.
Has anyone a particular recommendation?
Antwort von Matze66:
I have about half a year since the 300th, the Panasonic NV-GS From the picture quality I'm thrilled. Between my old JVC and these are worlds apart. The colors are super and much sharper the picture synonymous. I paid then kanppe ¬ 700. I wanted to have the digital input. Otherwise, there is the Identical NV-GS 280 (only difference is the lack of digital input) and the köstet usually 50 ¬ less.
In Guenstiger.de the inside is just for 640 ¬. The 280s even for 550 ¬.
Another tip would be the NV-GS 140 (a) was the predecessor model. The cameras differ only slightly lower dur photo resolution (the new one has 3.1 Megepixel, the old 2.3-but you want to photograph?) And the new one has a slightly larger screen and an optical image stabilization instead of electronic ones. My brother has this and we have the same time with both cameras filmed and then viewed s.Fernsehen. It was not see a difference. Maybe you'll get somewhere favorable than the discontinued model.
Antwort von JammyMcCom:
Yes already looks very good.
But Panasonic is synonymous to the brand you can trust?
And the quality is just synonymous after dubbing on a PC and encode to DVD quality TV still have.
Is that the case?
For that, the picture is great if you like the Cam s.den Television followed is clear.
And what is that?
Is the 3 normal CCD - chip in a Panasonic still better than
For example, a with a 3.3 megapixel Sony Cam?
Antwort von Markus:
And the quality is just synonymous after dubbing on a PC and encode to DVD quality TV still have. That has not only influence the camcorder, but especially the synonymous MPEG2 encoder, which compresses the video before burning to DVD. And last but not least, the synonymous term decided by the film, which will be burned onto a DVD. 8 hours on a 4.7 GB DVD disc itself creates the best encoder is no longer free of visible artifacts.
Is the 3 normal CCD - chip in a Panasonic still better than an example, with 3.3 megapixel ...? Yes, definitely, no preference whether megapixel imager or not. 3CCD are 1CCD preferable. The fact that the chips of the Panasonic has fewer pixels, which is not so bad, for a DV camcorder anyway absorbs only (720 × 576 =) 414,720 pixels.
