Infoseite // 480 images per second at 2400x1800 pixels per Picture

Newsmeldung von slashCAM:


480 images per second at 2400x1800 pixels per Picture of rob - 24 Jan 2007 12:42:00
Who with his slow-motion shots is not satisfied, either because the software is not good enough interpolated or 50 FPS is not yet slow enough, you should look for the variant sports for the American television. 480 images per second at 2400x1800 pixels should be enough to really matter how fast each executed Fowl subsistence. The Phantom of Vision Research v10 makes it possible.
to news reporting



Antwort von Cpt_morgan:

Na toll, and once again there is no price at.
The do not be surprised if the thing buys None. lol



Antwort von Axel:

"Anonymous" wrote: Na toll, and once again there is no price at.
The do not be surprised if the thing buys None. lol

've Seen Blood Diamond yesterday. The message of the film came to: I will not buy diamonds! Reminded me somehow s.deinen comment.



Antwort von Cpt_morgan:

Alternatively, the weisscam under www.weisscam.com



Antwort von AndyZZ:

Seems only the camera module to be. How is because this huge amount of data recorded?



Antwort von Martin:

The article talks synonymous of nearly 1000 images per second at 1920 x 1080, does something like 1080/1000p.

Whether the pictures in "Lowlight" synonymous still suck what? * g * The exposure time is then limited to 1/1000s.

For lower resolution should be even higher frame rates possible.

Personally, I would now already have a camera range, the 1080/50p and a slow mode in PAL Resolutionbeherrscht.

Greeting
Martin



Antwort von Markus:

"Martin" wrote: [1080/1000p] The exposure time is then limited to 1/1000s.
Nope, this is not true. You can use the image converter each 30 s long exposure and still host with 1000 fps. ;-)

And if you now think that makes it ... None each camcorder can be better with exposure times> 1 / 50 s record. Nevertheless, these devices are still at 25 fps.



Antwort von robbie:

@ martin:

which there already ;)... the sony xdcamHD 350 ;)... may be exactly what you wish because;) ..

beautiful evening
robbie



Antwort von Martin:

"robbie" wrote: ... the sony xdcamHD 350 ;)...
Na primavera, since I must now only sell my house, and already I can afford the Cam :-)

Greeting
Martin






Antwort von Valentino:

"robbie" wrote: "robbie" wrote: ... the sony xdcamHD 350 ;)...


One must only observe the F350 XDCAM HD in slow mode is only half the lines absorbs nearly 540 lines and not 1080 as is the case with HD (V) should be the case.
So would a JVC HD200 but a bit better, because those at 60 fps 720 lines aufzeichent.

Greeting

Valentino