Frage von Britta Leuchner:
Hello and greetings to the dear Board
As the title suggests, is a conversion, at first glance looks as if something someone's holiday movies lofi a non workable pseudo Tuning miss. Not quite but almost. Just imagine you have in a report in DV-PAL private recordings integrate its quality is not in your sphere of influence were, and thou art s.die standard 5:4 DV PAL 720x576 25fps bound anyway because then the whole will be burned to DVD and halfway aufm TV should look like. It may happen that you have said in private materials ASF images in 640x480 - vermutl. M4S2 - Format get that with a commercially available digital camera holiday has been made. Clear. Images of this kind we know enough of 11 Sept. in New York. Now they tried their best but so as possible in your DV PAL sequences to integrate, which means but possibly before converting so that they, for example, in Final Cut Pro to cut are.
As far as I know is nothing next ASF as MPEG4 and I wanted to ask whether someone with knowledge, or by trying out what I do not already have better results than I have with VisualHub (which by converting to DV-PAL at 720x576 conditional inflation is Natural. a stupid pixel ratio and the conversion ratio Curves are synonymous arg contrast get added), or whether there is a smarter way than converting to DV or the prior convert of all time.
Because the target question is:
The quality does not deteriorate even more than it already is anyway.
Love love love greetings and thanks in advance for any thought or seis synonymous only a loud imaginary approach. I would be happy ....
Britta
Antwort von WWJD:
It's trying times with MPEG Streamclip http://www.squared5.com/
I convert my AVI from a commercially available DigiKAmera synonymous with this tool, while in DV-NTSC but maybe there's your situation for what synonymous usable.
Greetings Jack
Antwort von Britta Leuchner:
Hey, thanks for the first tip. That went so fast :-). Show me the same at times ... (loads straight down)
PS: I still have one question: the ASF clips are in 640x480 which is 4:3 while representing DV PAL 720x576 5:4 shows. I think one should not a stupid pixel blurring edges to get the convert to prune / cropping that you almost 5:4 to 5:4 conversion, right? How do I s.schlausten ... There are still DV PAL 4:3 quadr., I can easily clip those into a 5:4 sequence integration? ... determined ...
Antwort von K.-D. Schmidt:
Or try something with the free program of eRightSoft SUPER. It converts pretty much everything.
Greeting
KDS
Antwort von Britta Leuchner:
ok, that's really nice that you replied so quickly but I wanted no pure software recommendations ask ;-). If you already write müsstet whether that ASF support and whether they are at my problem in detail can help. How to converters work and that there are many of them so I can ergoogeln. It's more about the technical background and from the knowledge to obtain the best possible result out of what goes.
The Converter is all possible, is clear. The ever can convert almost EVERYTHING, synonymous. The practice does not usually different. The specific case is difficult in a software to integrate, because he nunmal a special case. MPEG Stream ASF has ever recognized garnicht clean and is a gray area there, as it is synonymous Quicktime itself does. Visual Hub there with no possibility of interference bezügl PAL 4:3 or 5:4, crop or not crop, there is only PAL ... pity. But we come from this issue, because the search for the appropriate converter would be the 2nd Step.
As always synonymous, I would like more background knowledge about ASF gain and whether it actually mpeg4 is not what you can somehow umcodieren without quality loss, because I on MAC Final Cut Pro, and a report in DV PAL format really facing a challenge with the ASF Files stand ...
PS: tech INFO -> OS X 10.4 Final Cut Pro 6.0.3 Quicktime Pro 7.5 plus perian and thousand other codecs and tools are available. Converter: dozens!
Love love Thanks in advance,
Britta
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... I would like more background knowledge about ASF gain ... http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Streaming_Format
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Gude
Mach bar drum and keep her around but the 640 x 480.
Then as synonymous no worse or better, but remains just as it is.
..... New Black size 720x576 to 640x480 clip the center is set.
MfG
B. DeKid
PS. SUPER is credible, I do not under MAC.
Antwort von Britta Leuchner:
... I would like more background knowledge about ASF gain ...
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Streaming_Format
Gruß Bernd E. If this was meant as a sideswipe: perhaps I should link the entire bezügl. ASF to paste, which I did on my calculator? ;-))) Times but no seriously, with the knowledge that was based on the specific problem is related. Only in the event that you've ironically with the link. :-))) Otherwise thank you for the nice link intentioned.
@ B. DeKid: The Black with the frame, I had already considered synonymous - Thanks for the hint - I just found it not so nice way. Yes and SUPER is not for MAC, that's true.
I'm now just about my relationships umzurechen so I get a PAL fullscreen without distorting the situation. So option 1 would be in compliance with the PAL Width 720 to 540 - 4:3 remains preserved and it would have been up and down a slight edge, or in compliance with the PAL Height 768 x 576, which also receives the 4:3. The latter would be the deterioration of Natural. augfälliger because the still next pixel would be inflated. The Excess Height gecropped might be in order to come to 720. Does anyone have a tip for the framerate translation? Here, yuv420p at the ASF, so I can not really understand what it ....
If I change the frame rate further improved, I would do it with ffmpegX and individual settings to try
what irritates me about ffmpegX is that if I enter 720 for Width and then click to 4:3, ffmpegX auto Height jumps to 544, but 540 would be mathematically correct 4:3 ratio. If the pixel format with which to do?
Thanks dear and loving greetings,
Britta
