Frage von chilluminatus:
moinsen community forum, I've searched for well-behaved, but unfortunately found no answer ... advance warning: I'm into video editing stuff still quite inexperienced.
Now to my problem. I must soon a
flash / video on a flatscreen with native 852x480 resolution display. so far so good - is not a ding. I
have the entire project at 852x480 / 25fps properly, is now ready. now called the command
"we burn the movie onto DVD and let him run as an endless loop."
a large *. swf to a large multiple gigabyte, uncompressed *. avi to convert is the right tool with no problem and also have done.
here but the real fun starts. the dvd do I create opportunities only
720x480 or
720x576 or
704x576 (25 fps PAL). what is the quark? then I would have the video on one of the so-called resolutions runterquetschen just so that it ultimately back to 852x480 pulled when it runs through the Scaler?
so stupid the world can not be - but maybe I'm the idiot here synonymous ... Can someone please enlighten times what it needs to be done? it must be possible to make a film, in the native resolution of your TV is designed synonymous in this resolution to play!
greetings and thanks in advance for the help.
Antwort von Eva Maier:
DVDLab the review times, which is synonymous unkonforme format.
/ E
Antwort von evilknivelgast:
Kommt drauf s.wie but then you play. If you NEN standalone DVD player uses, there is fear that either the format or do not accept it in PAL / NTSC / SECAM (720xblablub) down by then calculate around Bildschirmscaler again expected to be qualitatively quite what might be rubbish.
If you are anyway of a laptop / PC, you need not be synonymous to the no longer quite so topical Compression MPEG2 (DVD) fall back. Newer ala h.264 (hope I am Vertu nciht domestic number) is as efficient and then the file can still ne DVD pack (and then of course, certainly not of standalone players will be liked).
Antwort von evilknivelgast:
The Resolutionriecht incidentally greatly nem LCD (TFT)-Television. Depending on the price range can be very annoying. If the thing has no way NEN computer (VGA, DVI or HDMI) you might even tions "normal" television signal. 480 lines suggests that the monitor was designed for NTSC (the first parts sold here were all designed to NTSC and PAL have expected then down oso, afaik poor quality 720x480x30p ...), then it would probably the best.
PS: Can evilknivelgäste their contributions not correct?
Antwort von PowerMac:
No.. Why synonymous? Who then corrected the post? Anoymer Guest 1, 2, 3, or rather the anonymous host 5660?
DVDs must be PAL / SECAM or NTSC his. Your comic resolution power makes no sense. Forget it and work with PAL 720x576. When your NTSC monitor could actually similar look good. Remember though, that an NTSC DVD in Europe can certainly cause problems.
Antwort von uffnik1:
thanks for the quick reply.
@ powermac:
NTSC is denk 'ich mal flat, as several smaller films, I had to include the PAL are all synonymous. I like the effect or that a PAL film getimed runs correctly when I placed him in a NTSC project reinziehe?
720x576 what concerns: aside from that little in the presentation of the remaining time to this resolution can be reworked - erklär me please have a look what happens when the signal through the scaler from the TV is running, then 852x480 on hochzieht? it looks but synonymous hindered from, or not?
to ask next auszuformulieren: if the ding eh 'ne widescreen resolution and I want to have the pixel synonymous still knows exactly why I can via the DVD then it does not give this resolution? but there is a logical error in it. das ding is 852x480, but no DVD can provide this resolution, and I can connect digital synonymous nothing. I get to the part about ever a sharp 1:1 native-res images to see? if so, how? and why, the standards for the resolution is not agreed with each other? but everything is somehow stupid.
I think it is clear that a flatscreen without digital input is not necessarily designed for presentations, but I just need a working workaround for the golden middle between input and final returns.
STRESS prefer slide and the presence in 720x576 or 720x480 imitating again, with the building and then the reproduction of scaler to 852x480 is withdrawn, or the finished film rausgerenderten of 852x480 to 720x576 or 720x480 convert? I can just synonymous with grafiker use my brain not imagine which of the two results would look worse.
Antwort von chilluminatus:
^ Incidentally, that was me. sorry.
Antwort von PowerMac:
You have to differentiate: the TV has an internal Resolutionvon 852 to 480th The thee but has not to be interested. Because the TV "eats" only the standard TV standards. In your case with PAL 720x576 NTSC or possibly synonymous. The fault lies on the (low-) Television. This is the largest scrap. The ALWAYS expect everything to and yes, it is hindered from. You have no choice -> PAL. And never again worked in specific resolutions for a particular television. You have to keep s.TV standards.
Antwort von chilluminatus:
@ powermac:
okay, danke Dir
but what would you do now - the
presence in the DVD resolution or
re-create the existing material on the dvd resolution scaling? I guess at least that of the convert 852x480 to 720x576 in terms of the layouts takes longer, because the rules & bilder yes - if they return through the scaler a 16:9 television - to be dragged urpsrüngliche size. Although it is still "ouch", but at least have the correct requirements to run wide. or I guess wrong? the presentation if I need to create them in 720x576, I do so more or less the same, so that the layout in retrospect auf'nem widescreen again right - text and images zusammenquetschen.
OR * It's now just click * I place the film on 720er wide scale, ideally centered in a 720x576 project, so I up and down the famous black balken have. if the TV picture hochskaliert then, should the bar will disappear ... right?
Thank you for your patience. ps and semi-Offtopic:
me is - purely mathematical terms - the question of why 720x576 is a 16:9 standard ... agrees with the relative front and rear but not? at 852x480, it just times out. You like me to send an explanatory link, I want you with not too many nerves noobfragen to? I mean, basically I need ATM only an acceptable, workable solution - but I am personally not happy with me if things I have not fully internalized.
Antwort von PowerMac:
720x576 PAL, digital technology. What is a logical aspect ratio there is another number. 16:9 PAL 720x576 is synonymous than saved, but the output with a factor 1:33 externally equalized. So quasi 1024x576. You have to be in an anamorphic PAL Project work. So 16:9 PAL. As you make your stuff and make it purely hochrendern.
Antwort von Max.3:
all (largely) clear. many thanks for the helpful input!
