Frage von MacSeller:
hallo its professionals,
I have two weeks before the Canon HF10 increased.
Now I try to work with CS4, but jerky in the preview box so that no liquid play of the clip is possible.
even when playing the mts file with vlc player, hack it.
what can only lie, 2.4 GHz + 2 GB RAM + GeForce 8600M GT should meet or for AVCHD?
or is it because of the lame 5400 platte?
I think it is a FireWire 800 hard drive to get there and of directly from the mts file edit?
technical data:
OS: Mac OS X 10.5.6
Processor: 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
RAM: 2 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
GFX: GeForce 8600M GT 256 MB VRAM + @ 1920 x 1200
HDD: 150 GB (; 5.400rpm, 11 ms access time, 8 MB cache) Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00
I am for each rat and grateful tipp
Antwort von andidhouse:
Hi,
I have a macbook pro 2.2 GHz and 4gb ram. when I try the Canon HF100 clips in Premiere Pro CS4 play in the pro res encoded are synonymous, I see only bucking. the same clip in Final Cut Pro runs without problems. with the native AVCHD format, it is not because this format too computationally intensive for a laptop is.
but the performance of final cut is quite impressive in comparison to pp!
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Tell me though, it is cumbersome s.der programming at Adobe, you dear Jörg here but do not want to believe.
Antwort von Jörg:
Bruno oh, look at the performance data of the "calculator", my machine do I need to connect so that they are not finished, before I begin ...
Antwort von MacSeller:
Hi,
I have a macbook pro 2.2 GHz and 4gb ram. when I try the Canon HF100 clips in Premiere Pro CS4 play in the pro res encoded are synonymous, I see only bucking. the same clip in Final Cut Pro runs without problems. with the native AVCHD format, it is not because this format too computationally intensive for a laptop is.
but the performance of final cut is quite impressive in comparison to pp! it sounds so great s.with Final Cut Pro, abbbbbbeeer I have the MTS file ja erstmal encode to> Apple's ProRes 422 and it takes time
and then there is the problem with permanent RENDER oh my god
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Windows-based is the use with AVCHD but much more pleasant then.
You could XP / Vista on the install and MacoBook Sony Vegas / Movie Studio 9 PE or Edius NEO use. Your Book is fast enough.
I myself have a laptop with Intel P8600 (C2D 2.4 GHz), 4GB RAM, 320GB HDD, 9600M GT with Vista and edit my AVCHD footage with Edius NEO and the Canopus HQ codec.
The performance is quite ok. However, the book does not s.die performance of my system ran Quad (Q6600 @ 3GHz, 4GB RAM, 1.5 TB HDD, ...).
The transcoding into the intermediate codec requires only 0.75 times the original duration.
I would rather you as a Windows Quadsystem guess as time and Money with your Mac "verbraten"!
The Quad will take you for the video editing and the Mac for everything else.
Antwort von MacSeller:
Windows-based is the use with AVCHD but much more pleasant then.
You could XP / Vista on the install and MacoBook Sony Vegas / Movie Studio 9 PE or Edius NEO use. Your Book is fast enough.
I have sony vegas pro 8 to lie on the cover is not for sale (as a retailer of gift received), since it is determined to demonstrate that lack determines the AVCHD codec
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Windows-based is the use with AVCHD but much more pleasant then.
You could XP / Vista on the install and MacoBook Sony Vegas / Movie Studio 9 PE or Edius NEO use. Your Book is fast enough.
I have sony vegas pro 8 to lie on the cover is not for sale (as a retailer of gift received), since it is determined to demonstrate that lack determines the AVCHD codec Check the times on a Windows machine. Edius NEO is synonymous as a demo. With Boot Camp you could be so synonymous Windows on the MacBook use. Vista without activation for 30 days.
