Frage von ropu:
Hello,
I am superior to me a SonyFx1 needed to buy and to have a few questions.
1) there is a difference between FX1 and Fx1E, one reads again and again 2 Title
2) The camera is 2 years old, and supposedly has only 8 hours on it. Can they take this camera out?
3) Is there a technical nature which weaken these cameras before ~ 2 years were sold?
4) How is the picture? Especially in low light, backlight and in artificial light
5) What can be done for such a camera used to pay even if it is okay?
6) How is the picture quality in comparison to SonyVX2000 or SonyVX2000E
7.) or principle would you recommend another camera?
Thank you for answering my (many) questions in advance.
Antwort von schunck:
1) there is a difference between FX1 and Fx1E, one reads again and again 2 Title
Yes and no ... FX1E mW is like all the Sony's name for the European, so the PAL model. FX1 is, however, as the name synonymous for FX1E used, which can be confusing.
4) How is the picture? Especially in low light, backlight and in artificial light
Lowlight is generally quite good and whole, is characterized mainly by a low noise from. The image quality is not quite s.eine A1 ran, but it is very subjective, synonymous here again the low noise.
5) What can be done for such a camera used to pay even if it is okay?
What are you as willing to spend? What kind of job do you have? Did they finally at Ebay dealer for the 2649, - seen ... Between 2000 and 2500 in the framework.
6) How is the picture quality in comparison to SonyVX2000 or SonyVX2000E
Because yes FX1 HD recording, the VX in SD picture quality is obviously poorly comparable. Of course, VX2000, mainly synonymous SD 2100 for a top-quality, which can FX1 HD material but synonymous with SD runterrendern, although I do not know how well Sonydas solved. In a corresponding down-converting in Postpro should, however, the same, if not better results when using those with the "old" Sony compares.
7.) or principle would you recommend another camera?
I think the FX1 is still a top camera. Since they are now somewhat older, there is at least in terms of functionality and picture quality better, the Canon A1 of example for you but very much deeper into the pocket and whether you have the slightly poorer image quality and the low controls (in Comparison A1 with the Console) the chromatic aberration of the Canon's preference is a matter of taste.
I can give you only recommend the FX1.
Liebe Grüße,
Flo
Antwort von PowerMac:
The theme is aaaaalt.
A two-year-old FX1 with eight hours? Sure, I buy synonymous NEN polo and running in two years, only 300 km.
The image quality is relatively good in HD. To SD in the Postpro. expected: near s.Digibeta. Lowlight is pretty good. But you can find all 1001 test reports. Max Euro 1500 with warranty!
