Frage von Kentiapalme:
http://www.amazon.de/TFE-Objektivadapter-Nikon-Micro-Four Thirds/dp/B003VPTCTG/ref = sr_1_7? Ie = UTF8 & s = ce-de & qid = 1295291260 & sr = 8-7
what do you think? this is a fair offer price? fit it really ran all Nikon lenses? or are exceptions? This is synonymous for thought for the GH1?
or finds it offers better, cheaper? :)
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
Forget it. Get NEN Novoflex and do not look onto money, what good is cheap if nothing works afterwards?
MB
Antwort von Kentiapalme:
too expensive for such a stupid part!
http://www.amazon.de/Bajonett-Objektiv-PANASONIC-AG-AF100-SIOCORE/dp/B002Q4QFMK/ref=sr_1_8?s=ce-de&ie=UTF8&qid=1295292935&sr=1-8
ask fit in here really only ran f mount lenses? these are the old manual, right?
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
You're getting closer ....
MB
Antwort von Kentiapalme:
Is there inen (cheap) adapter for all Nikon Lenses?
Antwort von rush:
http://www.amazon.de/TFE-Objektivadapter-Nikon-Micro-Four Thirds/dp/B003VPTCTG/ref = sr_1_7? Ie = UTF8 & s = ce-de & qid = 1295291260 & sr = 8-7
what do you think? this is a fair offer price? fit it really ran all Nikon lenses? or are exceptions? This is synonymous for thought for the GH1?
or finds it offers better, cheaper? :) Evenin,
know what you are G-Nikkor? Newer Lenses
without aperture ring.
What does this mean? You can not simply use these Lenses with an adapter, since you have no way to regulate the Aperture.
So you need an adapter, you can directly s.dem miteinstellen the Aperture - if you want to use G Nikkor lenses.
The Novoflex seems well have to and I mean synonymous times to have seen a slightly cheaper product which is clearly synonymous with these lenses.
So one probably. something more here as an alternative:
http://www.amazon.de/Objektivadapter-Adapters-Adapterring-Nikon-P1/dp/B00371KCS4
But I can not help the quality / say function.
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
I see there is no aperture ring. My goodness, if the Novoflex costs 160 EUR and it is 3 times that already have a reason why one must then try around with cheap stuff first ?!?!? Why must it always be cheap? Cheap crap is that we know at some point anyway.
MB
Antwort von Kentiapalme:
So synonymous today's kit lenses are among the G Nikkor lenses? synonymous of the 2007 or so? : You know ... stupid question
if so, can I install s.deinem linked adapter yes. However, I have a manual lens synonymous with the same connection of sigma. possible problems?
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
Experience, agrees with the cheap things the Flange not, so can not shoot so well. When Novoflex containing all true, especially the feel and quality.
MB
Antwort von Kentiapalme:
I definitely would net the only one with such an adapter. It does not always expensive expensive expensive! this stereotypical cheap = shit has to be right but hir net. I can film it determines, with good quality.
Antwort von Kentiapalme:
so now have a "cheap shit" bought objective. wenns nix is good, then sell it self! ciao;)
Antwort von rush:
I see there is no aperture ring. My goodness, if the Novoflex costs 160 EUR and it is 3 times that already have a reason why one must then try around with cheap stuff first ?!?!? Why must it always be cheap? Cheap crap is that we know at some point anyway.
MB Then open your eyes and stop railing against "cheap stuff" without knowing it. An aperture ring is as well available and you can see the synonymous;)
Need not go straight into the air, just because you once tried an alternative show.
Do you buy brand synonymous only sneakers? Which are so synonymous at least 3 times as expensive and your theory must indeed be so because quality has its price ... blabla
Not everyone here as ash and sand s.mehr who only want to try experimenting needs, one probably. not synonymous to invest ¬ 160 in the Novoflex adapter. I think one needs to always watch a bissl - there are just people see the whole test here as a hobby and like to rum .. synonymous when it's financially often do not fit into the budget. Is it okay - and for the remaining 100 ¬ he can buy one or two old "cheap" lenses ... So where is the problem?
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
I think I'm right here, just not her;) .... I will not at all the better next run in the details ...
MB
Antwort von rush:
I think I'm right here, just not her;) .... I will not at all the better next run in the details ...
MB This need not be so synonymous run next.
There is the Novoflex - slightly more expensive and certainly the optimum when to feel, quality, value sets etc. - no question.
And there are 1-2, but cheaper alternatives - the quality is known, can be discussed. I can not say anything - I only mentioned that there are such products.
I just find it makes little sense Drittanbeiter products as a bad "cheap stuff" label - have tried without them.
Can it be but they also work quite well.
