Frage von ShakyMUC:
Hello, I try with an in Photoshop's Picture (just a black layer with a transparent "window" in the middle) in video track 2 my video track 1 to "overlap" (ie so that only the image contents of the window is visible).
Premiere Project: 1920x1080
Image Size: 1920x1080
Premiere CS3 VER 3.2
This effect occurs on the following: On the right side (about 25-30%) does the Picture s.zu "spin", ie it is then divided / flickers / vertically divided twice.
It makes no difference whether I use it as a gif or psd import. Even an attempt to "only" a gray frame to use (the rest transparent) was unsuccessful?!
The effect occurs ungerendert and rendered on!
Does anyone else have any idea which could s.was or is this a known bug?
Thanks & Regards
Ralph
PS: I just take a screenshot of the error appended, because the image content in words to describe bad is :-)
Here you can see right, I think quite clearly what I'm with "shared" my.
Antwort von Debonnaire:
So you want to, that of the track 1 only to see that is what the central recess of your black surface of track 2 is open, right?
In other words, in principle, you want your track 1 - Video-round (or just left and right, but no preference would be) trim, so that in the recesses behind the video is visible?
Why so complicated? Simply turn the Crop-Effect (in German probably "pruning") on Track 1 s.and snippets on all sides just want as much away as you using your mask did want to cover. Et voilà! :-)
Antwort von ShakyMUC:
Hm, as far as good (Crop)
But what if in the previously black areas a font, a framework, etc. to be seen to be the previously black surface (for example) only 50% transparency should have (to highlight certain parts of image), etc. etc.
Sure, thanks for the tip - I will display the problem (with the black area) would solve synonymous. The picture shown (gray box) it works but nichz more - unfortunately!
Maybe someone knows yet what it is causative or are you?
Antwort von Debonnaire:
Ich habs jetzt mal in a PAL SD 4:3-Project through:
The Photoshop File "Rahmen.psd" looks like from Annex 1 (note synonymous layers palette right) and the Premiere workspace looks like the Annex 2.
I do not know how something could go wrong.
You see even the most of me on track 2 Track Matte Key applied, which by the mask in Photoshop Track 3 through the view of the track 1 are free.
Antwort von Wiro:
Maybe someone knows yet what it is causative or are you? Hello,
unfortunately I can not tell you synonymous.
For me, it works on CS3 completely normal, synonymous with GIF, TIF, TGA.
However, with a normal HDV Project. Intensity I did not.
Suspicion is therefore Intensity or on the imported graphic.
Does this only because in that moment on if you put the graphic in the timeline draw?
Ich hab mal mein Test GIF uploaded. It is already transparent and leads to the insertion into the timeline immediately to the desired result (for me).
Try if it worked for you. It is only 10 n.groß.
Antwort von Debonnaire:
Intensity I did not.
Suspicion is therefore Intensity What do you mean? What is Intensity and in whatever way comes here before? I can at the Asker never read anything of Intensity!
Antwort von ShakyMUC:
>>> @ All:
Stop first :-)
Thank's for thinking, but please do not just head the next break.
Mgl. it's because I have a 1920-er "Project (square pixels) with" 1440-he 'material (1.333-he pixels) work. What else (quality, crossfades, etc.) is synonymous wonderfully.
I check it later and give notice!
Regards
Ralph [/ quote]
Antwort von ShakyMUC:
So, hab jetzt mal durchprobiert several scenarios:
It was actually s.besagten 1440-material in 1920-he Project. The whole with pure 1920-Mat --- and he does it without problems (as I of course synonymous with earlier projects, know-SD).
@ Wiro:
Although you had with the presumption of Intensity presets right.
But it "happens" when one synonymous with the Project to create manual settings (1920x1080) for example, existing material (and otherwise captured) an AVCHD Cam (HR10 in my case) to process
- 1440-and then he Footage (with 1.33 pixels) in Project "mitverarbeitet".
_________________
In sum: Funny - and this is a pity Workauround needs. But still interesting to know.
Many greetings and thank you again for your Nach-/Mitdenken
Ralph
