Frage von ironvillage:
hallo specialists
as we have seen most of it is so? HD material converted after dv
usually yields a poorer quality than directly dv rotated.
how do you get the best result if you shot in full HD
Material in DV will compress?
maybe there's trick 15 is because a quality venünftige
on the row to get.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
hallo specialists
as we have seen most of it is so? HD material converted after dv
usually a poorer quality yields, ....... ? Are you sure that you not confuse anything?
Antwort von dän:
hallo specialists
as we have seen most of it is so? HD material converted after dv
usually yields a poorer quality than directly dv rotated.
how do you get the best result if you shot in full HD
Material in DV will compress?
maybe there's trick 15 is because a quality venünftige
on the row to get. ? I understand 'only one thing: Trick
17!
Antwort von shodushitanaka:
What B.deKid says, is that if you, as even described in HD DV runterrechnest, the quality is always better than when you directly into DV aufnimmst.
Gruss,
Shodushi
Antwort von PowerMac:
1) It is calculated in uncompressed HD and SD Down in DV.
2) Is HD better than DV in DV film.
3) To Down numeracy, there are x workflows and methods. (MPEG Streamclip, Resizer, AE method, right in the editing program, etc.). Google helps!
Antwort von weitwinkel:
zb. Of bruno peter:
http://www.hennek-homepage.de/video/resizing.htm
gruß cj
Antwort von ironvillage:
hello sorry I'm only now back again
yes I mean SD
yes and thank you for your effort
Thanks again
