Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Aiptek GO-HD Test of thomas - 17 Dec 2007 19:10:00
Test of the tiny and huge cheap-HC 720p camcorder Aiptek GO-HD, in America for under $ 300 to acquire. Resolutionvon With a 1,280 x 720 pixels, 30 frames per second with a 5 megapixel CCD as h.264 MPEG4 video to SD memory cards up - also has a 3x zoom cam and a 2.4 inch display but uskeinen Image Stabilization. Unfortunately, movements in the picture often produce artifacts and lead to "smearing" of moving objects. Furthermore, the extremely high compression of images editing very time consuming. Conclusion According to the author's good for the Aiptek GO-HD and so because of the lack of controls only for the Gelegebnheitsfilmer the small cam is always wants to be s.and Recording a short time to make, but not really for the shooting.
This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von Quadruplex:
Conclusion According to the author's good for the Aiptek GO-HD and so because of the lack of controls only for the Gelegebnheitsfilmer the small cam is always wants to be s.and Recording a short time to make, but not really for the shooting. Anything else would be synonymous been a surprise ...
Antwort von besucher2007:
sic est.
Antwort von besucher2007:
What I hate s.diesen test is that it is not perfect.
s.1) The little Aiptek Camera stores in an MPEG4 format, which is currently not with Premiere, Edius or Ulead video programs compatible.
S.2) After consultation with Aiptek in Taiwan but that it creates burning software NERO the MOV files into clean HD sequences convert. This allows all (!) Known video programs.
p.3) Basic Problem: The camera records only (!) in the NTSC format, ie with 29, x frames per second. A precise cutting in PAL mode is impossible. Conversion of NTSC to PAL or 25 frames per second is done only in massive loss of quality.
p.4) Oh wonder: Will the Camera s.einen connected HDTV Television, is the viewer to watch at! The picture is perfect where it is quiet recordings.
p.5) The Camera we use as "offboard" Camera for aerial photography (see ushttp://www.pennula.de, there under "videos".
p.6) Aiptek A small device is ideal for quiet recordings! No movement or panoramic shots are the best area of application. In this case, worth the purchase of this HD camera with impressive results.
p.7) Finally: Who is 300 euros for a CameraLink output, may not expect a perfect device. Finally: a look at the small Lens Lens or small, as can scarcely fail and decently light and this is still the most important thing.
Greetings!
www.Pennula.de
Antwort von Markus:
p.6) Aiptek A small device is ideal for quiet recordings! No movement or panoramic shots are the best area of application. There was a digital camera but synonymous. ;-)
Antwort von salem:
Hello,
I have said since Aiptek about 1 / 2 year and can draw following summary:
1, the quality is largely dependent on light: sun = very good HD quality, synonymous with moving pictures; Any situation with less light will lead to significantly inferior quality, besides the AF is less accurate;
2, As indicated, the recordings can be quite convincing when Cam s.den HDTV connected directly and the videos from the couch "view; s.PC from the near distance you can see of course the image error.
> I have all my video with the Aiptek on an SD card and they only see more of in this way;
3, of course, absent are the almost non existing manual controls;
Conclusion: As mentioned above, the performance is equal to the price, for less than 300 EUR bekomment a corresponding output;
Antwort von Quadruplex:
As mentioned above, the performance is equal to the price, for less than 300 EUR bekomment a corresponding output; For me to hold the question of whether I 300 euros for one in practice only limited usable camcorder issuing or the same amount for a mature relationship in any everyday computing model suppose. I would take DV ...
