Frage von ulfilas:
Magix Video deLuxe 2006, among many other features synonymous filters and a tool for image stabilization on.
I've now been out-and hergedoktert (s.kurzen scenes, so it is not so long), but can not really find that my s.der Wackelei ancient recordings would have changed anything.
Has anyone happens to have a clue what setting what shaky control settings back to the raison brings?
The manual is on this point is rather cloudy, and, as I said, my experiments were not really of success.
Thank you in advance.
Antwort von C.I.W:
The parameters you need to shake themselves, depending on the setting. The supreme rule, I always at 4-5. Always synonymous Click on the "black screen edges by stretching out." The image smoothing need you so that it looks good for you. If you are in your version but the opportunity did with Virtualdub plugins to work then you should quickly Anitishake the tool download. Is free and really good. But that's only when I think of the pros version!
Antwort von ulfilas:
Thank you for the quick reply.
Yes, that is probably not the last word on the subject was, at that time instead of the pros-variant version of the simple to buy, I unfortunately have consciously become synonymous. Something happens when the market M. ..- suddenly and unexpectedly in front of an editing software is, though one quite wanted to buy something else, and so synonymous has no idea that there are two versions. Well, yes.
What Miran image stabilization tool is not catchy, it is sometimes the designation of the processing steps.
"Point 1: Radius stabilization for analysis"
I have a distinctive point (for example, a house in s.Horizont landscapes or the left nostril with large pictures of people ... sorry), its position during the whole setting will not change - to some extent as an anchor point for the rest of the image ?
This would then mean that this element to a very tight framework to consider would be considerably smaller than the film image.
Or should the pan be here "entwackelnde" field will be captured? That would be but still the overall picture film, hence, the entire image area, and the framework would no longer make sense.
"Point 2: Division for the analysis:
As the explanatory note underneath says SOLLICH the range set here, in the detection and removal of camera shake to take place.
The
detection of camera shake, I have yet but just in point 1 (above) is set. So is the setting in item 2 is only responsible for their
elimination? The names of steps 1 and 2 seem to me more than clumsy. What do I because now point to what - and how?
"Punkt3: Analysis and Calculation":
Why is the analysis because only as a last resort? The analysis which, in Wackler of the source material? Would then not actually logically with this start?
And: What the hell is behind "temporal smoothing"?
My test series lead, as I said, not to usable knowledge.
