Frage von HenrikHX:
Hey!
The following sections, I cut a new mill in the eye
Hard Drive: 2x
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1500GBCPU:
AMD Phenom X4 II 920, 4x 2.80GHz (Alternative:
AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition, 4x 3.00GHz)
Ram: 2x
A-DATA Value DIMM Kit 4GB PC2-6400U CL5 (DDR2-800) Mainboard:
ASUS M3A78-EM, 780GBlu-Ray Brenner:
LG Electronics GGW-H20L Cooler:
EKL Alpenföhn Groß ClocknerGehäuse:
Antec Solo PSU:
Corsair CX 400WMisc.:
Brennsuite:
Nero: Nero 9.0 Verdict? Makes sense, or is it better to Intel?
If the material with SonyEX fed-1 (1080i).
Antwort von darklord77:
Which FSB, the CPU?
Possibly. it would make sense to get faster RAM so that the power synonymous will be 100% utilized.
Antwort von MHK:
The CPU has an integrated memory controller, as it currently looks at AMD, I do not know but in Intel's i7 is it because Ram is faster because more does not necessarily halt the memory controller in the CPU sits, and since the assembly of the pedestal is still synonymous plays a role.
In any case, according to various benchmarks, the i7 faster than any equivalent clocked AMD / Intel Processor. Unfortunately synonymous expensive.
Since its your videos Cam MPEG-2 encoding, but you should be with the system as you put it together you've come zurande well.
So buy recommendation;)
Even more of a personal note to myself: do not buy ASUS motherboard;)
MfG MHK
Antwort von masterseb:
why amd always, if but for intel video is reliable and much more ... now synonymous cheaper. an Intel quad can not be beat ... except of an Intel oktocore.
8gb ram and why? tute half of the fast is not synonymous?
I would prefer a decent dvd burner take. the blueray can only be one and one is not even foreseeable standard. auswechselnkannst still.
Antwort von MHK:
... "A reliable than Intel AMD '... Says who? I think that (Intel owners) for absolute nonsense. Because I read that an AMD system crashes constantly ... That is absolute nonsense.
"Intel Quad is not to beat" .... is very generalized. And with Sicherhit refers only to the expensive new models. Because up to ¬ 250/300 class AMD can keep up quite well!
"except of an Intel oktocore" ... Show me the shop where I am today a octacore can buy. Especially since it Intel has not yet officially presented.
"and why 8gb ram? tuts at half speed is not synonymous?" ... The speed of the Ram is overrated (especially as already mentioned by in CPU's integrated memory controller). In Gunde is it that when it cut the mass FullHD makes. If I close my Premiere CS4, 4.3 GB of RAM will be released and 5 GB swap file. That tells me I am synonymous with 8 GB of still too little would. The moment when the calculator starts externalise the performance goes into the cellar. As you can synonymous harddisks have 300-400MB / s in RAID0 read / write .. That is still much slower than the operations in the memory. The more RAM the better the cut of Full-HD, if the editing program is used.
"I would prefer a decent dvd burner take. blueray is the only one [...]" ... What your preferences are concerned, let me have not been convicted because errscht freedom yes, but everything else is nonsense. As you can see that you either no idea of the Do what you tell (Enstschuldigung) or were simply too lazy (sorry) the components you view the linked HenrikHX has. I would be interested in your opinion what standard for optical disc with high resolution video if not blueray. If you are with "only one" can only mean the blue-ray .. then you would click on the link is sufficient to provide an overview of the supported format to get: "6x/2x/6x BD-R/BD-RE/BD-ROM single layer " 4x/2x/4.8x BD-R/BD -RE/BD-ROM dual layer " 3x HD DVD-ROM " 16x/8x/16x/6x/5x/16x DVD + R / DVD + RW / DVD-R / DVD-RW / DVD-RAM / DVD-ROM " 4x/4x DVD + R / DVD-R DL " LightScribe " 40x/24x/40x CD-R/CD-RW/CD-ROM "
MfG MHK
Antwort von masterseb:
"except of an Intel oktocore" ... Show me the shop where I am today a octacore can buy. Especially since it Intel has not yet officially presented. see apple-> 2 Quad
The rest is matter of opinion.
Antwort von MHK:
"except of an Intel oktocore" ... Show me the shop where I am today a octacore can buy. Especially since it Intel has not yet officially presented.
see apple-> 2 Quad
The rest is matter of opinion. A pity, I've thought of what was missed ...
Here is a link to each joint of Apple CPU Specification:
http://download.intel.com/design/xeon/datashts/318589.pdf
Because nowhere is something of octacore. It is just a huge difference in whether a system is a dual-or quad has Octacore (which is not yet officially for sale there!). Dual Quad systems exist such as sand s.Meer, and not only of Apple.
The first octacore Xeons probably this year appear to have 16 virtual cores (at least it leaked). This then gives you a dual board 32 multiple virtual cores. If Apple then as a 32-Core anpreist you're safe again, the first cries of ui .. because it shows what a great CPU there. Not just of numbers can hide;)
MfG MHK
Antwort von klaas:
octo, eight lat =
quattuor, lat = four, this derives from the Quad, gives 4 cores ...
2 x 4 cores as in the standard apple mac pro equal a total of 8 cores in 2 CPUs is a octocore
a einprozessiger octocore would be a correspondingly cpu with 8 cores ... two of which would result in 16 core and not 32, they would probably speak of a sedacore ... if it would be derived from Latin, I believe my great ... although I've Latinum existed, but we lost anyway iwann ;-) ...
except one probably ;-) ...:
Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres, quarum UNAM ...
naja, so much ... this is probably OT;) ...
best regards,
Klaas.
Antwort von MHK:
Do not ask it of Apple's marketing roll. Two quad are and remain two quad, it will never become a Octacore.
The new Xeons are based on this year's native octacore. Based on the Intel Core i7 architecture lays there Processor 8 Core. Each core has HT. The heist If the CPU in your device manager with 16 cores. Two of them on a workstation / server board and already you see that 32 multiple virtual clusters (in this sense, 2 * 8Core = 32Cores in Device Manager ...: p). That is still far from being one the "32 Core" system. It remains a system with two Octacores. After foolishly brings HT currently not very many plus points .. I have the feeling at least.
My concern here is less about Apple's marketing, but more to the statement of what masterseb of "a oktocore intel" and talked to Him Comparison to an Intel / AMD Quad ranzog. This sounds just a CPU. And there is not yet so stop right to buy ...
If it is the point of view of offering AMD has long been synonymous "Octacoresysteme" from 2 to quad Opteron.
MfG MHK
Antwort von PowerMac:
Very useful discussion ...
Antwort von Alan Smithee:
Two times three advances four
widdewiddewitt nine and three leaders.
I do me the world
widdewidde as I like.
My concern here is less about Apple's marketing, but more to the statement of what masterseb of "a oktocore intel" and talked to Him Comparison to an Intel / AMD Quad ranzog. This sounds just a CPU. And there is not yet so stop right to buy ... ... and because it - like you even synonymous've noticed - 8 cores on an Intel CPU or not to buy, there will masterseb probably have meant the following: "1 computer with Intel CPUs with a total of 8 cores"
Where is the problem?
And what Apple has to do with it?
Antwort von masterseb:
;-) thank some people just do not understand it.
Now, our poor are still inquiring with no real answer there.
buy it you, my son!
Antwort von joerg-emil:
Hi HenrikHX,
I think this is just so hinhauen. I myself, a similar configuration but with less memory (see below). With HDV material, I can at a real-time preview at half resolution liquid right cut. However, I turn to color, it comes quickly, depending on the intensity of the shakes.
For the stability of AMD:
I just yesterday 155min long project with three camera perspectives and 4 tracks finished. These were, however, by DV material (!). Since the cameras were very different, I have some extreme color and a soundtrack made synonymous with effects still occupied. The real time preview (both picture and sound) ran synonymous with transitions completely unnecessary. That was extremely important, because I have to watch for lip. I have about 35 hours s.dem Project and worked the calculator I did not even abgeschmiert.
The Ausrendern DV material to DVD has lasted about 200 min, corresponded to approximately 130% of project length.
What surprised me was that the CPU load both in the processing for rendering as synonymous with only about 33-35% at. Where to now has been experienced, I can not say. In any case werkelte probably more than one processing core s.der, but somehow do not have all four ... because someone may have a tip?
I use only the onboard graphics, maybe it is out or maybe because of the few memory ...
Gruß Jörg-Emil
Antwort von TiMovie:
Just out of curiosity - what is the cost because of the fun?
Antwort von joerg-emil:
Hi TiMovie,
my calculator was about as follows:
CPU Cooler 185 EUR +
Board 70 EUR
Housing 35 EUR
Memory 60 EUR
DVD Burners EUR 35
Operating system: Windows XP OEM version EUR 60
500 GB hard drive 60 EUR
250 GB hard drive 40 EUR
Gruß Jörg-Emil
Antwort von Fenek:
In some things I would otherwise equip the system,
I do not like what is in any case the Seagate hard disks.
Samsung would be certainly the better choice,
s.besten the 1 Tera plates running reliably.
The Asus board
because I would rather the "A" M3
N 78 take
because of the NVIDIA GeForce 8200 chipset
graphics card
we say with a 9600GT you are already well served.
graphics card on board is an absolute NoGo.
Think synonymous over a sufficiently large power supply after!
600 to 750 watts it should be, they are beautifully soft and warm is synonymous not so much because they do not see above performance level running.
Instead of the AMD 920 might be synonymous to the 940 service,
then you are for much less money very close s.dem performance index of the I7 turn.
In some things the 940 is even faster: D
Antwort von Fenek:
PS:
fast,
Hardware Prices rise to much time!
Hard disks, CPUs, memory, etc ...
