Frage von JonasB:
Hi all together,
At the moment I cut and edit with the packet-Cs3 ^ ^, come synonymous great deal. But of professionals in my area, I hear time and again that the only software that Avid ... I think they only make ^ ^ I always question what is the better s.Avid, better workflow? Faster? I think with Adobe After Effect, Photoshop and Premiere as extensive ... who knows the difference so big?: P
Oh and worthwhile for me to switch to Avid?
Jonas
Antwort von PowerMac:
You should research and think. Not easy questions.
Antwort von KrischanDO:
Tach,
I have a few months ago the same question. The answer was of two professionals:
If you put your projects with major television broadcasters and video companies have to share, take Avid.
If you have been working with PS and no exchange constraints are there, take first.
I have done has worked.
Otherwise helps search the forums ...
Regards
CS
Antwort von JonasB:
If you put your projects with major television broadcasters and video companies have to share, take Avid.
Hi first thanks for your answer, scheind not obviously being a vernüpftige answer to get me ... but next schonmal much help, but why is Avid better? Do you know that? Can we order in other formats? Or why? Or send it when you work with broadcasters, the project files to the station?
But thank you ever, have ever helped me much;)
Jonas
Antwort von newsart:
Which is better: Mercedes or BMW?
Ie, the question is asked probably wrong. At the moment there is a tendency that the AVID-TV market in the area greatly decreased, while increasing FinalCut. With better or worse has nothing to do.
BTW: Who asks already a bestselling author, with the typewriter or word which he has written his book? Nobody - so na!
I was not yet synonymous TV station asked what software with our contributions and reports has been cut. I would have with "Edius answered and hardly had an editor so you can start something. Edius is better but not synonymous - only different. Which is better - blond, brown or black?
Antwort von KrischanDO:
...
Or send it when you work with broadcasters, the project files to the station?
...
Jonas That was the Council of two lecturers. I do so only for small sites or infomercials Docus of events, had no experience with it.
That with the typewriters and the writers will always be happy to cite, but is not always so zutrefffend.
For cameras, it is partly nonsense, because a small man with a different photograph than with a large or medium format camera.
When editing software, it is probably the question of how to get with the handling anfreundet. As Hopper Photo PS 3 has a long and good experience with the support of Adobe was holding me closer.
What I still have aufgeschnappt: Avid is "picky" about the hardware is concerned. Does certain graphics cards, etc.
I have PPro CS3 on a thick forest, meadows and PC from the shop around the corner, 3.0 GHz Dual Core, 8 GB RAM, 512 MB graphics card, 1.5 TB HD, ¬ 1200, Vista Business 64th
The 80-minute Project rappelt it quite often (CTRL + S is my friend!), But PPro was synonymous not really appropriate - say two Dealers.
Before the 1000s ausgibst, determined to find two people in your vicinity, you with a bottle of wine or crate of beer and can afflict times a half-hour taster.
Also good for software Watch: Cut rates s.der VHS.
Does not cost much. The time you should invest before an expensive tool aussucht, with one a few years wants to work.
Regards
Christian
Antwort von newsart:
and once more in addition:
AVID has its strength in history and in networked environments. Therefore, the claim of a channel with numerous cutting systems, archive, playout, etc just a different, than with a cutter with a stand-alone system.
We have never delivered the project files, but always ready to master - or raw materials.
And last least: AVID AVID is not. That is the name of the manufacturer, which offers many different systems. Apples with pears here to compare makes little sense.
If you with your editing program clearly come, all tasks in order to solve it satisfactorily, then there is no reason to go or are wondering about it.
Antwort von JonasB:
If you with your editing program clearly come, all tasks in order to solve it satisfactorily, then there is no reason to go or are wondering about it. Thanks newsart ... the next has helped me ... I come with cs3 very well aware I've only thought of the special Iwase off must be when all the big cut with Avid. But if the history and s.der Networking s.der There is no reason, as a "stand alone" to go;)
Thank you
Mfg
Jonas Bomba
Antwort von Beatfabrikant:
The great s.Avid NLEs is flat, so that you can very quickly cutter. Just trimming, which is the actual editing is avid makes applications very well. In addition, the Avid applications to specific workstations tailored and tested so that they run on this stable was in the film and television industry is essential. But how many times already in this forum already said, the video or movie cuts the cutter and not the program.
Personally, I like to cut on a Avidschnittplatz, if only because just very stable. However, the future of this company still in the dark, as with apple final cut straight to the market storm. Is no wonder synonymous with the price differences;)
