Frage von Tiesto:Soon had a firework in front to film, you need shots for such a UV filter or NEN Backlight? Because it is so dark and the effects very bright ..
Antwort von Markus:
Soon had a firework in front to film, you need shots for such a UV filter or NEN Backlight? No, you will not need any special filter, a fireworks incorporated. But Aperture, shutter speed, white balance and manual focus and content of ... So really everything. ;-)
Antwort von Tiesto:
what are the best settings? how can I test? when the fireworks leuft leuft it .... yes then yes I have no more time to test! ... and is NEN Wide Anglehilfreich what schärfe concerns?
Antwort von Aljoscha.Niko:
The best would be a long shutter speed so that Aperture still enough light can penetrate, and then come the effects a little better over here. Gain off, if possible, but if you are with the car, you can indeed something away from the next car, then turn on the light and free now. The white balance do you properly in bright, but similar environmental conditions using a white part, eg a sheet of paper, otherwise you take the default "external" etc.
Greeting
Aljoscha
Antwort von Markus:
The best would be a long shutter speed so that Aperture still enough light can penetrate ... Yes, such a camcorder had anybody times. ;-)))
A fireworks display is so bright that one with normal exposure time (1 / 50 s) can be filmed. The signal is switched off, so manual is set to 0 dB. Since the corresponding aperture value for this setting but, depending on the intensity of the camcorder varies, it must first be known to what model camcorder you have, and then someone would need his experience to post.
The aim should be that the colored lights are synonymous and do not appear totally white. Oh yes, and the tripod with Fluid head of course, do not forget! Is better for any Mitschwenken and later crossfading.
Antwort von Tiesto:
Mh what exactly is the difference between a Wide Angleund a fisheye? clear when fisheye comes a little more, if it is close but not both at the Bildquallität better by the capture of more light? or is it worse? gibs about tests?
Antwort von Axel:
Mh what exactly is the difference between a Wide Angleund a fisheye? clear when fisheye comes a little more, if it is close but not both at the Bildquallität better by the capture of more light? or is it worse? gibs about tests? A fisheye is an extreme wide-angle, where the spherical distortion effect as in the purchase notes (peephole). On the distortion of the light still comes waste s.den image edges, which is synonymous Focal s.einer certain no longer can be corrected. What with the whole picture has to do? A lot, because a bad Wide Angle foreground objects often can not properly represent sharp, it has irregular ( "cushion", especially with moving subjects eklig) and produces reflexes (images of the aperture shape, of light sources based), or chromatic aberration (different wavelengths of light, aka "colors" are to the film plane / chip does not match the focus so that a colored contour shadow). If you have the intent to approve / buys a cheap lens, you have with effects such uncool is always expected.
Most light is captured incidentally, if one takes
no Lens.
Antwort von Tiesto:
mh which Angleist Wide well with the 30mm thread? at ebay what is of Pentax and Sony ..
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Wide Angleist ... what good with the 30mm thread? ... Look at the times synonymous Raynox Wide Anglevon to: There is already in the 70 - 100 euros class some relatively good.
Gruß Bernd E.