Frage von Rolf Hankel:
Hello
I know someone will write as you compare apples with pears.
But if I am in the test reports as read and the horizontal resolution of the two brightness Cams compare: my dear husband, as the Canon but cuts much better.
What would you advise me to buy.
Manual intervention is of course the Sony is much better, but important is, of course synonymous what "rear rauskommt" The "sch ... Viewfinder rigid" in the Canon of course I like none.
Oat Bin serious amateur films of his post synonymous.
Gruss Rolf ...
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
For me as a demanding hobby filmmakers Tour is the case under the Camera Klößbrühe been clear as the Canon HV30 is to become after the SonyHDR-HC3. My cameras have compact synonymous but they must not be too small, the viewfinders is my highest at 10% important, the Canon still has it. I work on virtually almost always with the body of a tripod support.
Canon HV30 because of the many manual intervention and possible combinations of the available settings. The HV30, you can because of the good manual controls viellseitig very synonymous weak light for recording and recording difficult situations and the results are even at times Schwchlicht garnicht so bad. In Taglicht provides sharper pictures than some AVCHD Camera and the pictures are even sharper than make prosumer cameras, and practically without CA and with no artificial Kantenaufsteilung.
Antwort von Jogi:
If you vernünfitig outside all automatics, film then I would wish you the FX7 heartily. The slightly higher sharpness of the HV30 is only in direct comparison to.
Antwort von Zizi:
Want to save money better especially sharper picture together with small design for the holidays, etc. HV30!
do you want "more" So Camera handling manual intervention to make very clear the FX7 as simple as that!
Oh will you save money not take the good with HV30 accessories then you make the best images and do not have tripod, filters, macro lenses, etc. still synonymous with this!
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
If you vernünfitig outside all automatics, film then I would wish you the FX7 heartily. The slightly higher sharpness of the HV30 is only in direct comparison to. Do you have the two cams are compared? Or is the sharpness difference is only detectable and measured s.Television not.
At the moment I'm working still with Panas. NV GS 400th
I enjoy working with your own settings, automatic gives me nothing
Gruss Rolf ...
Antwort von Jogi:
I do not have a 30th AGM But I had an FX1 and FX7. I have some time before the demo material HV30 views and then compared with the FX7. In a direct comparison is the difference to detect. So the HV30 has a slightly sharper picture but s.den edges for something synonymous restless. There are no "worlds" in the sharpness between the two cams. The sharpness s.der FX7 can still be regulated. But then, logically, and only about Kantenaufsteilung but inadvisable.
Antwort von r.p.television:
The Choice, I would rather take the HV30. The FX7 is not so much the better of Bedieunung than that would be worth the extra cost.
Poor Wide Rolling Shutter Angleund have both.
I would rather the XH A1 into consideration. The still has a CCD (keyword Rolling Shutter), good Angleund Wide XLR inputs. This is worth the extra cost.
Antwort von Jogi:
why so many users actually ride on the rolling shutter around. It is less evident than the CCD smear!
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
I would rather the XH A1 into consideration. However, this camera produces a CA is washed. Do not understand why the prosumer swallow ...
The HV30 is currently getting around 700 euros, so you can not do much wrong at the purchase of this Camera.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Do you have the two cams are compared? Or is the sharpness difference is only detectable and measured s.Television not. The image quality of the HV30 is technically and practically superior, see tests of VAD, for example.
Antwort von domain:
The Measurement says may not yet all too often. Who measures much, attaches much crap.
Twill A tripod is as synonymous not so great s.sich Bruno, it depends on the body of the wearer. If this in the context of a gray seal is the measurement result is certainly better than a chicken breast of Karl Lagerfeld structured.
Antwort von pdrusso:
I have the FX7 and the HV10. With enough light, the HV10 a par with the FX7. Only when it is darker, the better FX7. Whether the latest movies with the Canon I 5dMarkII. If the budget is there I would consider myself a Canon 5dMarkII to buy. The picture is overwhelming and not comparable with the FX7.
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
I have the FX7 and the HV10. With enough light, the HV10 a par with the FX7. Only when it is darker, the better FX7. Whether the latest movies with the Canon I 5dMarkII. If the budget is there I would consider myself a Canon 5dMarkII to buy. The picture is overwhelming and not comparable with the FX7. But I would prefer a "real" film camera.
Just as I herauslese the HV 30 is actually better.
I am making nature films and worked with a lot of WW-intent and the 2.2 telephoto converter Raynox 2025 PRO, which was calculated for HD. Besides movies, I only by Tripod, because I lack the naturally-up viewfinders, but since I could somehow be arranged. And above all, it's all a matter of more manageable price. Which Wide Anglewäre because for the HV 30 recommended?
Gruss Rolf ...
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
The Measurement says may not yet all too often. Who measures much, attaches much crap.
Twill A tripod is as synonymous not so great s.sich Bruno, it depends on the body of the wearer. Obviously you lack the experience, how you stand with a body works.
I do this for over 95% on tours with the best of success for years. A Mini-Tripod (in my body integrated tripod), I only for time lapse recordings or my major but very light tripod for long-night recording.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Which Wide Anglewäre because for the HV 30 recommended? Guck doch mal in Betriebsanleitug (Canon downloaded), there is everything you need. There is not one of the Camera Data Becker Book Of ...
http://www.databecker.de/media/prod/docs/sample/442649_sample.pdf
Antwort von Jitter:
With the HV 30, you can actually nothing wrong, I like Bruno. If you are unexpectedly not happy with the HV 30 will, you can do it without great loss to sell. In the opposite case (the SonyFX 1000 proves to be wrong), you do it without great loss not happening.
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
With the HV 30, you can actually nothing wrong, I like Bruno. If you are unexpectedly not happy with the HV 30 will, you can do it without great loss to sell. In the opposite case (the SonyFX 1000 proves to be wrong), you do it without great loss not happening. I decided my babe and bought a HV 30; Media Markt not to exhibit, 649.-euros.
Gruss Rolf ...
Antwort von partylogger:
I decided my babe and bought a HV 30; Media Markt not to exhibit, 649.-euros.
Gruss Rolf ... Boah because I am flat. That is an offer. And I thought I had with 666 euros for a bargain DVCut acquired. My coming tomorrow, hopefully with the post.
Antwort von Jogi:
With the HV 30, you can actually nothing wrong, I like Bruno. If you are unexpectedly not happy with the HV 30 will, you can do it without great loss to sell. In the opposite case (the SonyFX 1000 proves to be wrong), you do it without great loss not happening. Should there be a bad thing I really strongly doubt, then I would FX1000 one years on ice and then on eBay for 95% of the new sale!
Antwort von domain:
Obviously you lack the experience, how you stand with a body works.
I do this for over 95% on tours with the best of success for years. I think you over the word, synonymous, I've tried everything. But I eventually came to realize that I am actually from two dental implants in the sternum for screwing the body of the tripod would be used and also during the recording, the air would have to stop.
But that would be certainly a very good solution for light cams, like the HV30 has become.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Then did you not smart enough and probably given the wrong synonymous construction uses. Would you would you my experience for light cameras like the HV30 or HC3 the tripod and monopod in the high arc cast into the abyss.
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
I decided my babe and bought a HV 30; Media Markt not to exhibit, 649.-euros.
Gruss Rolf ...
Boah because I am flat. That is an offer. And I thought I had with 666 euros for a bargain DVCut acquired. My coming tomorrow, hopefully with the post. Well yes is synonymous not a bad price
Gruss Rolf ...
Antwort von Rolf Hankel:
With the HV 30, you can actually nothing wrong, I like Bruno. If you are unexpectedly not happy with the HV 30 will, you can do it without great loss to sell. In the opposite case (the SonyFX 1000 proves to be wrong), you do it without great loss not happening.
Should there be a bad thing I really strongly doubt, then I would FX1000 one years on ice and then on eBay for 95% of the new sale! We are not talking about the FX 1000 (super, but too expensive for me) but to
the FX7
Gruss Rolf ...
Antwort von Jitter:
For the FX7, I notice even more than for FX 1000th The resale value is still lower.
