Frage von Spitfire:
Hello, I wanted time to know what is better:
1 / 3, ie greater or 1 / 4, ie smaller.
Why is this important advantages and disadvantages of what has
larger or smaller?
Antwort von edgar:
Bigger is better because the pixels are not so co-bruising. They simply have more space, which leads to less noise (Noise: Krisseliges Picture in bad light)
Antwort von WoWu:
That is not with just two words to explain but the larger the image sensor is the more pixels can be larger surface area of each pixel people. Bigger pixels are synonymous disadvantages, compared with CCD and CMOS others first, but once again synonymous disadvantages.
The whole stands in a rather complex relationship.
In addition, the optical properties of the lens, the more difficult or expensive, depending on the tiny surface on which they have to project .... So synonymous with the plays into it ...
If you really interested in details, I can really only recommend you to be found exactly once. (see below)
Antwort von Chrissigorn123:
Larger chips offer a number of pixels more space. These can then be more synonymous (without the sharpness of the picture to deteriorate because of a larger chip synonymous with more pixels can be).
Larger pixels can absorb more light, resulting in smaller chips Comparison with the exposure time of an object in low light shortens (ie the pixels less time "need" to light, since they're bigger and are so light).
Shorter exposure times result in less motion blur in low light and noise to images in the so-called low-light area.
