Frage von qwertz:
Hi Folks
I work with Maya and would like to pinpoint objects in 3D Real embed videos (track). In a CMOS sensor to be yes at some individual frames fast camera movements are very unclean, rather incompletely recorded. Now my question:
How well would the new Canon HF 100 (CMOS) in comparison to Panasonic HDC-SD1EG-S (CCD) in terms of the cut?
Antwort von WoWu:
Well worse, because a CCD images in the recording finished. (Mal apart from Interlace)
But you miss some other advantages of the CCD image sensor EBN does not have.
Furthermore, it must not be so fundamentally CMOS verteufeln. There are CMOS sensors, the RS does not have, because they just read out progressively, as synonymous devices in which the RS is not as pronounced occurs because the sensor with a higher selection rate is sampled.
But before the "flash effect" even as you're not sure, because as soon as it is to avoid this effect would be needed, is currently still no camera.
So you see, you have such a differentiated view topic. But the direct answer to the question is simply:
"worse"
Antwort von qwertz:
Thanks for the answer!
I have already thought about it since the CCD with better driving behavior. Despite everything, I have a few Youtube videos viewed, in which it is shown the 3D objects very well with CMOS technology can be integrated. I think he is the one with HV 20 has made.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Qwertz
There really are synonymous only a few exceptions, which are critical in CMOS.
I personally prefer to use CMOS in many respects because they are very significant advantages over the CCD have.
Only it is also about the disadvantages of the conventional CMOS sensors know to be able to circumvent problems.
