Frage von Spielkind:
Hi All,
We have an Internet portal that will be presented at the various companies. (;) uswith Videos
We now want to improve our quality and Usein buy new video equipment.
The videos are about 90% of interviews, which are underway at fairs.
The other 10% are likely to lectures and branch visits. (; Quick service restaurants, shops, etc.)
The budget is around 4000 ¬.
What I have picked me to now:
Camera:
Panasonic AG-HMC151E (c. 3000 ¬, if used)
(; have particularly good for Wide Anglemit standard lens, because AVCHD - already cut in working order and got along well with it)
Memory:
2x SD-HC card à 16GB (and 75 ¬)
Micro:
Rode NTG-2 (, 190 ¬)
(; At fairs prevail incredible noise that I want to filter out as much as possible. Is the Micro well suited for this? The sound for me is actually the most important would probably be synonymous willing to pay slightly more for the Micro.
Good would naturally be a lapel Micro .. If anything, however, with radio and I think that is not in the budget, right?
Do you know a good and cheap radio link, with which I could plug the Rode NTG-2?)
Tripod:
Manfrotto 936 Pro Video Doppelprofilo (, 120 ¬)
(And it is possible that part yet in retrospect one with Manfrotto head-pimp "?)
Light:
?? Head Light
(; Can anyone a tip for an effective head light type, which is in the budget?)
What do you think? Any suggestions? Especially for Micro interests me your opinion - for me the hardest subjects. ^ ^
I hope you can help me? ;)
you would certainly be very grateful!
Many greetings!
Edit: Oh yes, and an additional battery will naturally be there.
Antwort von Spielkind:
None can give me some tips? = /
Antwort von Meggs:
If you get along with the AVCHD editing, you come with HDV or DV even more clear.
As an alternative recommendation, the Canon A1S, which Tonsektion no wishes unfulfilled. It is for example easily possible to record with the built-in Micro, the atmosphere on a channel with an external micro-reporter the interview without any atmosphere to the other. Built-in limiter, phantom power, automatic or manual audio control, line or micro levels are selectable per-channel basis.
This dynamic mono-Micro for interviews, a capacitor Stereo Micro for Atmos and an executioner with micro Tonangel.
Antwort von Spielkind:
Hello,
Thanks for the tip!
Perhaps you're right - on the tape does not capture so much s.der sache ..
The sound settings are not beat the price segment yes. how it looks with the Wide angle camera?
can you tell me now to say whether the micro rode NTG-2 is suitable for my requirements?
head light and would have an idea for a good person?
Many greetings and many thanks!
Antwort von Manuell:
You can download the Canon XH A1S ja mal with the Panasonic HMC151 camcorder-face in Comparison.
I would tend rather to as HMC, especially if AVCHD is not a problem for you.
HMC is a little easier, I think, has the larger Angleund almost the same wide tonal range and you have a tapeless workflow.
In the light of the Litepanels Micro head is perhaps something.
Antwort von Spielkind:
Hello,
Unfortunately, the HMC is probably not yet been tested, at least there is no information in the camcorder-Comparison.
've Read that makes the HMC because Pixelshift not quite as sharp images.
Is the difference big? Would be another point for the XH A1s ...
If the HMC equipped with sound really good just like the A1s?
Thank you for the tip with the head light - would inform me about the times.
Thank you and many greetings!
Antwort von Spielkind:
I'm in my search for a good head light came across the following:
Switronix led Torch TL-50
http://www.macro system.de/d/erweiterungen_torchled50.html
270 ¬
Which seems to be just a tad bit better than the above, what do you think?
Many greetings!
Antwort von Meggs:
If the HMC equipped with sound really good just like the A1s?
I do not know. Anyway, I have found in the data have never read something of a limiter. Whether it dominates the other niceties, such as channel 1 is Driven manual, channel 2 auto. Channel 1 has line level, channel 2 has micro level, channel 1 with drawing on the internal Micro, channel 2 with an external, etc., is questionable.
The Rode NTG 2 is certainly a good directional microphone. If you want to suppress the noise at a trade show, and the micro must be in the picture, you're going with a dynamic micro (eg Shure SM 86) better.
Atmos for a stereo micro (eg, Rode NT-4) is better. With the built-in stereo microphone of A1S entirely synonymous provides a good atmosphere.
Antwort von Manuell:
Of which I had forgotten the name, which has in the magazine Videoaktiv least somewhat better than the Litepanels, that with which you should be right.
Can you tell time then yes :-)
The XHA1 has indeed synonymous only HDV Resolutionund to the sound, since both have XLR connections and can be Driven manual.
Antwort von Spielkind:
The Rode NTG 2 is certainly a good directional microphone. If you want to suppress the noise at a trade show, and the micro must be in the picture, you're going with a dynamic micro (eg Shure SM 86) better.
Atmos for a stereo micro (eg, Rode NT-4) is better. With the built-in stereo microphone of A1S entirely synonymous provides a good atmosphere. Well, if the microcode in the end may be in the picture, I will clarify. For the sound that would surely be better. Have you perhaps even a hint of a spark gap?
Atmos is rather secondary, because the built-in Micro wealthy once, I think.
The XHA1 has indeed synonymous only HDV Resolutionund to the sound, since both have XLR connections and can be Driven manual. Hmm .. XLR Connections and manual audio control are indeed the main thing - I think that I would be served quite well.
So why at the moment but most of it for the Pana ...
Thank you for your suggestions! If you have any ideas and hints - just let me know!
Another question: Is the Manfrotto tripod of the camera etc but fair, or should I invest a few dollars more? If so - where pure?
Best wishes!
Antwort von Manuell:
Maybe you should think about buying a shoulder synonymous tripod.
Antwort von Meggs:
So why at the moment but most of it for the Pana ...
I've known now, the HMC 151 is not from personal experience that even A1S.
What I've read about the Panasonic, do not skin from the stool. With digital video assets of two extensive tests have been made. You may as synonymous to directly compare the two camcorders.
The A1S was a very good score with 78, the HCM 151 with 70 a good score. The A1S certified, a very sharp picture, the 151 HCM moderate severity. The A1S has pros as professional audio recording, which has a low HCM 151 Cons stereo effect.
Why except the greater Wide Anglefür the Panasonic? Full HD with AVCHD? Why could it be that if s.end still comes less effective Resolutionraus? Panasonic provides no information about the Resolutionder chips. Probably know why. The picture is obtained on fairly low-resolution chips, hailed by pixel shift to full HD, then stored as highly compressed AVCHD. On the camera then stands on it Full HD.
XLR and manual audio control are important times already, but in practice the features that I listed above, you are already echt klasse.
Honestly, I would never swap them for my A1S ne HCM 151st
Antwort von Buchungszeichen:
Honestly, I would never swap them for my A1S ne HCM 151st I'm considering buying a SonyEX1 too. However, the Canon is synonymous so your benefits ... How many hours can head for one rated as "lifetime" of the Canon?
