Frage von soahC:
I know these questions are asked all here, but I'm not currently an overview of the camcorder nor the time to look around (in order to audit!)
So I'm currently present on the search for cam ner new, and it should already "be a professional something," but remain at the same time as the 1000 Okkn.
was quite important to me is:
3CCD
Tangy
lichtverhältnisse (so synonymous in the twilight still acceptable image and so)
settings (exposure, focus)
I do not what is important:
look
manufacturer
nich ton (of course, beneath all sau, but must jetz nich so his profit-moderate)
I've looked at some jetz n times, especially the "older", like the Sony VX1000 or Canon XM1. weiss nich but unfortunately are still as good as I do not think tests.
or halt it receives a "newer", perhaps panasonic, but since I have no idea what it is currently, unfortunately, so there.
would really nice if some suggestions or experiences, or are so ...
merci
Antwort von Acer:
What I think about this: Panasonic NV-GS400. Meets your criteria, but have to shell out for 1200 ¬. So you can meet in spite of everything a small task: Give Google simply "Panasonic NV-GS400" one.
Ciao,
Philip
PS: Good luck in the final examinations;.)
Antwort von soahC:
Thank you, actually helps me schonmal the next!
such as with siehts ner stages from underneath, for example, NV-GS 250?
I've found the following differences:
zoom: gs400 = 12x/600x
GS280 = 10x / 700x (so I think you can live)
ccd: gs400 = 3CCD [1 / 4.7 "], 3 x 1,070,000
GS280 = 3CCD [1 / 6 "], 3 x 800,000
focal length: gs400 = 3.3 - 39.6 (mm)
GS280 = 3.0 - kb 30 mm [: 46.1-461mm]
book now the ultimate:
Price: gs400 = ¬ 1189.90
GS280 = 628.90 ¬
so book now I just type views of the main differences are the CCDs. merely how much better images with more pixels, the chip and more?
the difference in price is justified for the difference in image quality in the?
Antwort von Acer:
Natrülich the NV-GS400 CCDs brighter and synonymous "better". Of course, 1 / 6 "CCDs are very small, but they are not bad.
The zoom play in professional relationships are not very important (you animal filmmaker?)
WW seems to be next to. The wills price already be justified! The NV-GS400 offers all the features of the case, the price of the 2006 Cam-have fallen victim.
Comparisons times on the Panasonic-Page, the two models You have to figure out what features are important to you, otherwise take the NV-GS250 as a "substitute" for the NV-GS400, since she still has more features than the NV-GS280. This cam is suitable for you then when you click on manual focus ring, Headphones Output, zebra function, 25p full, you can do without, etc.. Ensure your budget goes for other things (extra Batteries, bags, filters, editing software?)
YOU need to know if it's worth the extensive range with the NV-GS280, or rather a semi-Cam more professional as the NV-GS400 alone is sufficient without any accessories. With the NV-GS250 you make a little compromise from NV-GS280 and NV-GS400, because the price is not excessive.
I would personally grab NV-GS250, as I said there's more there. NV-GS400 is the non-ultra-pros, but just too expensive.
Ciao,
Philipp
Antwort von soahC:
aha ...
I thought the nv280 would something like the successor of the 250th The model nuer wait, because on the panasonic site "new standeth."
I film bmx, skateboard and snowboard, and more recently, I should book now synonymous rotate my first musicvideo, so synonymous to ask for the brightness (with lights on stage, but with spots).
comparative picture gibts nich randomly among the 3 cams?
Antwort von Acer:
I do not know.
Among the successors and predecessors:
Panasonic NV-GS140 (old) and NV-GS280 (new)
Panasonic NV-GS250 (old) and Panasonic NV-GS500 (new)
Panasonic NV-GS400 (old), no precedent, possibly NV-GS200 (even older)
The NV-GS250 in the test had "good" in light test. Jan can tell you closer to it.
Okay
Philip
Antwort von soahC:
Okay, nor ne stupid question:
panasonic.de've looked at and compared, and can not zoom in addition to the differences found between 250 and 280 ...
Antwort von Acer:
Oh yes, "alt" net is "worse". In this case, I would say that it "is better." Look at the downward pressure on the corporations, there must be something so s.irgend been saved, right?;.) So, the NV-GS250 is Allegemeine my favorite. You could even put a helmet camera / Finger Camera Connect for snowboard / BMX, recordings, etc., would be cool.
Ciao,
Philipp
Antwort von Acer:
What more can the NV-GS250 / has more:
- Manual focus ring (very thick PLUS)
- F1.6 (brighter than NV-GS280)
- AV-In
- DV - In (great plus)
- More WW
- Headphones
- Active accessory shoe
These are the advantages compared to the NV-GS280. I would imagine synonymous, that the internal processing is better. Is only a guess.
Ciao,
Philipp
Antwort von soahC:
Oh man ... that's impossible.
wanted to look at grad mal guenstiger.de after the 250s, but unfortunately gibts nich.
but then caught my eye in the 500, for 957 ¬,
with 3CCD [1 / 4.7 "], 3 x 1,070,000.
would compromise the great nich s?
Antwort von Acer:
If you can do without a headphone jack?;.) NV-GS250 is cheaper and hardly any "bad"
Antwort von mitchi:
man man man, serious decision.
But many thanks s.alle, book now I have the choice schonmal extremely limited!
Antwort von Jan:
Everything Perfectly said Philip more than the majority here knows ....
The GS 250 has a better Low Light Test zb get in good with VAD.
GS 400 / GS 280 had the same Mag got satisfactory, the only Satisfactory at the 3 CCD Panasonic's. A little more rushed the 250th GS
Actually, the GS 400 is a little would have been better with their larger sensors, but the newer CCD technology's probably makes this possible.
LG
Jan
Antwort von Acer:
Oh yes, I forgot! The NV-GS500 has (a 25p full-screen mode is not the 250) and probably of Jan raised new sensor. I am actually a bit disappointed that the NV-GS280 only one had satisfactory (you could post a few times test herauskramen ;.)?). Get me to purchase the NV-GS280 rather then again twice überlgen. But in "video movies" was the NV-GS280 as high image quality of the Canon XL2, seeing that something is true, right?;.)
I can only imagine that the 250 has better low-light results because she has a f1.6 aperture, right?
Ciao,
Philip
HP @ Jan:
I can now put yourself in your situation, have a "guest questioned" your skills and your expertise. Yesterday I experienced the former, the latter I have (fortunately?) Not ;-) * smile *
Antwort von Jan:
There is always some stress, is halt so.
But the GS 280 in terms of image quality as good as the XL 2, which have na been asleep? - Well I am with my GS 500 and not 25 P function indeed synonymous.
Is quite possible with the GS 250 - Do not synonymous with VAD can see - how much difference between Satisfactory / Good is (2.4 to 2.6 zb)
If there is no problem at all the other name the correct answer, one must not only humiliate him completely, as in your case, or at me.
LG
January
Antwort von Acer:
Okay, 2,4 and 2,6 is not much - that calms me, thank you;).
Check a list of times this thread
JVC x5e Ich finds stressful as the guests were offended, but I do not excite me about it. Somehow this amuses me squeamish Rumgerechtele;.)
The non-knower, who through their knowledge can not make any mistakes, want to make the knower, the mistakes, not as a stand knowing.
Well, you is on what I have read worse wiederfahren, keep your chin up;.)
Ciao,
Philip
Antwort von soahC:
So, I hope this time are no misunderstandings. Or do I understand what is wrong, but the only one here who has GAST reingeschrieben I was, and I just meant the stands dismissed ...
Antwort von Acer:
No, no, I do not want to believe, but the "guests" in the link I've just posted;.)
Ciao,
Philipp
Antwort von Jan:
Of course, someone should intervene if a false statement is made, yes've already written the number of users (guests) directly look for errors, and then convey the smartly - without ever having here right answers to other's post given.
Well I'm glad that with my many contributors but few errors have been found - so far (maybe someone is now reading my thread's still 3 times through!)
Wiegesagt Slascam is pretty strong, very rarely lies. Why, I am s.and synonymous with a Canon forum - enter the Grossgrössen with 7 stars (3000 posts) often false, and those issues were not even that hard - if the Canon Magazine (read through catalog) we soon arrive synonymous as beginners on the correct answer - the Top Users knew no answer.
Yes X 5 - the die was already quite aggressively managed.
Yes, I have every week a customer mindestents me completely "peppered" - no reason to buy - Wide Angle / noise / vignetting / distortion / Included Camera Battery A, B, C, D, E - the entire consumer class that can sometimes annoying already, the last I was able to pacify my happiness without false if you want you can have each user / vendor vulnerabilities.
LG
January
Antwort von soahC:
Okay, I'm sorry that I am the thread again <Trash> book now, but:
I can see the panasonic nv-gs 250, and nowhere more so the 500 I probably can not afford it ...
ie: white jmeand what about the 300?
've gelsen somewhere in nem test
"aperture, visual" and "sharpen extremely high" and thought that sounds good, but I prefer to ask again for ...
Antwort von Acer:
The NV-GS300 is not as bright as the 250, the sharpness is equally good. The NV-GS250, unfortunately mist become really scarce, what is the
Antwort von soahC:
Thanks again for the reply s.alle!
And if anyone still interested:
Yesterday I got on so ner seite (pana3ccduser.com) sucking 2 videos, the comparison between the nv-gs 300 and nv-gs 500 (however, indicate 300Mb).
Once s.so nem lake, playground, and once again s.nem lowlight.
I have to say, of course, sees nen already distinguished between the two cams, but would be "bad", I refer to book now with my amateur opinion really does not ...
Antwort von Acer:
Low-Light is indeed synonymous not the only criterion.
As I once said: "Why even professional camera crews running around with giant video lights more than that of professional camcorders alone would be so lichstark" ;-)
Ciao,
Philipp
PS: Very nice choice, the NV-GS300, a lot of fun with it
