Frage von dopsat:
Hi,
I am in search for a suitable camcorder for me. I had a Canon MVX 150i up to now with which I was very happy for my purposes. I got the cam used mainly in outdoor sport / holiday recordings. Since I'm from the photographer and corner me different perspectives were always important, I got me a synonymous Wide Angle Converter increased. This was with interior shots (; little space) mostly up and I was very happy with it another time to get "Picture".
Unfortunately, with the camera a year ago have become broken and there is now pending, I am coming now provides desperately looking for a suitable alternative is synonymous in the area passable low light shots.
First, my decision was clearly in the SD 300 and then came the 2010s successors and now I'm at a loss.
Since I the fisheye effect with the WW Converter miss my old Cam not want any, I would need a cam with filter thread.
Because of the price of my Panasonic SD would be 66 very much, but unfortunately I can not there draufschrauben Converter. Gibts for this Cam perhaps an alternative (; aufsteckWW Converter?) To get more WW? Gibts perhaps somewhere on the net RAW files for download so that I can make a picture about the quality of the film in low light?
The SD 707 would have said, although the filter thread, but I speak not so at the price. The manual settings would appeal to me already synonymous, but do not know whether the higher price for it really pays off.
The same applies to the 300th SD
As for me is still interested synonymous, what's the difference between the SD 200 and SD 300? Would this perhaps an alternative?
The next candidate would be the Canon HF M306 also filter thread ... how does it look just as with the Focusing / LowLightverhalten from? Gibts perhaps for RAW files?
If I could help me with my decision a little? Gibts perhaps other cams have forgotten and are in the range below 800 ¬?
Thank you for your help!
Antwort von Bijan:
Dopsat Hello!
Judging your comments you make you have thoughts about picture-and host configurations, low-light behavior, etc. This of course means that you'd have to grow you have a good consumer camcorder to your needs (good low light behavior s.besten, a 3-chip camcorder with as large a chip, manual controls, zuwerden etc.) requirements.
The Panasonic SD 300 of you mentioned have I gained last year unde must say that I am very satisfied with the camera. The only drawback is the somewhat weak low light behavior, which can be explained by the rather small 1 / 4 inch CMOS chips. The difference of the SD 200 for SD 300 are the manual controls, such as Focus, Aperture and shutter speeds, which are present in the SD 300th Furthermore, I would hope one synonymous LANC port for a Hinterkamerafernbedienung I miss the great and the SD 300 is absent in the successor model SD 700 also, (((
Conclusion: For a good consumer camcorder you had to shell out even at least 800 ¬, or it is nothing! The SD 300 is currently traded on the Internet for 750 ¬, SD 700 will cost around 900 ¬ when it appears on the market.
The question I ask myself is synonymous, is it more appropriate to a 3 kauifen Chipkamkorder as the SD 700, 3 1 / 4 inch CMOS chips has, or rather an example of Monochipcamcorder Sonywith a thick 1 / 2 inch CMOS chip ??
I think a divorce because the spirits, right?
Greeting Bijan
Antwort von dopsat:
Bijan hi, thanks for your answer. You say it's really hard to get a proper camcorder to appropriate Money.
Because the 1 chip 3 chip problem ...
Is the Panasonic SD 200, Picture her better than the Canon HF M306? Has anyone tested both before?
