Frage von JamesBlond:
Is it on newer camcorders a shortcoming if you are not a replacement lens can make? If this point is crucial when buying a camcorder choice be? For example. Canon XH-A1 is really a great device, but it lacks halt the possibility of an exchange of lenses.
It is eigtl. the only thing I currently purchase of capacity. What do you think?
Antwort von PowerMac:
This question is funny. Of course this is a shortcoming. But just synonymous a "flaw" which is relative to the price you see. The quality of this camera is very good, the price / performance ratio is also very good. You want more? Anyone who wants quality, it must pay synonymous. Not the answer you wanted to hear? So easy it is!
Antwort von beiti:
There were some times but this survey once for 80% of the buyers of the Canon XL1 Bayonet change an important purchase criterion, but only another 10% next to the supplied lens bought.
I think that interchangeable lenses for video camcorders are not so important, because in the video field, thanks to a clear requirement of limited resolution, small chips and resultant short-long-zoom lenses with large zoom and high luminous intensity can be built.
Really need to become a video-change lenses only in special cases, such as extreme focal lengths of animal films or direct connection s.Mikroskope, telescopes, etc.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Let's say so, in principle, to use synonymous few cameramen, EB use in various Lenses. Usually there is always the same standard zoom off. If it's a good class with WW for a good telephoto picture, there would, one would use for optical reasons is not an interchangeable lens. The reason is precisely those that made it virtually maintenance (unit would be too long, individual parts are interchangeable) and that it is at 2 / 3 "and (1 / 2") is not fixed optics assembled there.
Antwort von mcdirk:
The issue here is quite detailed and up into the detail .... synonymous of the nonsense that the good old "Primes" or 2 / 3 "Lenses can use .... who is also with the idea of provenance, the times should read ...
http://www.lulu.com/content/1018079
Antwort von PowerMac:
Great advertising.
Antwort von JamesBlond:
Thanks for the comments,
@ PowerMac
Honestly, I do not know what the Camera XH A1 still Features (with possibility of the existing exchange of lenses) could outdo. Please clarify me on! Money does not matter, I'm sorry if it sounded.
Antwort von Frank B.:
Hi,
'm not Powermac, which you could certainly still a lot more professional parts mentioned. Times I content myself with the Canon XL H1.
http://www.slashcam.de/artikel/Test/Die- Canon XL-H1 in-test.html # T0
Frank
Antwort von PowerMac:
Or the JVC GY-HD110/200.
Antwort von pgroe:
..... na dann mal rein kuck here ....
http://www.auberge-tv.de/GYHD-100/Erfahrungsbericht.html
Antwort von PowerMac:
Je sais. It is not a fundamental valuation of a single camera, but about alternatives for HD cameras show, which is a removable lens which. Especially with the HD100 (and improved successor to the 110) better optics can only help. Then half of the errors have been eliminated.
Antwort von pgroe:
Aside from the interchangeable lens is not really better, but extremely expensive. Very surprising.
Antwort von pgroe:
... is not the problem, unfortunately, something goes next ... and at 100, as well as the 200 series, this means that there is only one usable Aperture there ... 5.6 ... and when you figure most want to avoid errors as far, only a mean synonymous Focal).
Unfortunately, at the JVC Model 250er nothing but synonymous nothing changed s.der problem .... Lenses and even more expensive does not eliminate the flaw, because the main problem with the little Optics has to do .... So what should an optics Exchangable if I only limitations problems and prepares ... ? Canon makes the already slightly clever ... But the problems come to be synonymous not all the way around ...
Greetings from the equator,
Wolfgang
Antwort von JamesBlond:
You've already, you probably need to compromise. I think with the XH A1 should I be well served. Thank you for the decision support
Antwort von PowerMac:
I feel the market for TV stuff like this:
Have Money: SD, 16:9? -> IMX Digibeta or with Digi-head
Little Money: SD, 16:9? -> Z1 and software Downconvert
Much Money: HD? -> Editcam with HD Optics
Have Money: HD? -> HPX500 with HD Optics
Little Money: HD? -> Z1
Almost no Money: HD? -> XH A1
And then there are the two special candidates HVX200 and Red, which are more suitable for theatrical productions are. The Red is fully equipped to cost 40,000, so just right for cool image films, music videos and everything Scenic. Possibly. adjusts synonymous in the documentary field. For everything else: next. The HVX200 is the cheap option for music videos and short films and backup for Varicam stuff. Unfortunately scheiss workflow with expensive tickets versus heavy, unreliable HD recorder.
