Frage von Klausinger:
Hi.
Have the following problem: I have a map on which I would like to apply camera movement (zoom and swivel). The Still Image s.sich is ok (to be hot, clear and sharp), but when I execute the animation, flicker parts of the image (particularly bright areas and the caption). I think that you can but with the anti-flicker filter fix. Is due to the flicker is gone, but the picture is blurred and the fonts are less readable :-(
My question s.die experienced: How do you stand in front of images, take for example Resolutiondes still the same as the Project (eg DV PAL) or larger? Interlace-/Deinterlace?
Thanks Klaus-Inger.
PS: My Project: Documentary Short (teaching) with many still-image animation, the DVD will be in DV Pal. Tools: AFX 7.0 and PPro 2
Antwort von Markus:
Hello,
Maps are generally critical motifs, as they fine graphical display content. Due to the relatively low resolution image, one video (DV PAL = 720 × 576 pixels) you can not really sharp cards reproduce.
Turning a trial times a deinterlacing, so that the line flickering disappears. If you like the resulting blur violently appears, instead, you press with a vertical blur out and try to find a balance between image sharpness, and flicker.
Not least, could be synonymous to use a less detailed presentation useful.
Antwort von Gustl:
Yesterday evening, a documentary about South Africa (travel with the train) and there was constantly an itinerary on a map displayed because flickered nix and everything looked very perfect. However, I fear that watching television with other tools to work, perhaps with 3D animation programs, etc. ? Or what is it that on TV it looks so perfect. At the resolution is less well?
Weiss someone?
Antwort von PowerMac:
I can do quite well with Motion. Is synonymous but extra card programs for television. Motion blur not forget! The biggest mistake when something is working in DV. DV is shit, especially when it comes to animation, graphics and Titling goes. This is done in a s.besten animation codec (such as homonym of Apple) or without compression. Final format will probably be a DVD. The suits then. The last project that I had in DV, I have done so synonymous. Footage as DV, Animation, Titling and Compositing all in Pro Res 422, ie without actually Compression. In a timeline. Blabla color and have been applied s.Schluss ultimately became everything to Pro Res (10-bit, uncompressed) in the timeline. The 10 bit has to be seen, the color correction, in writing, with the graphics. Then, the MPEG-2 encoded and the DVD "geauthort". Comparison with the work of DV is much better.
Antwort von Tackie de Lez:
@ PowerMac
how exactly do you do that: You create the animation in motion and then exportierst uncompressed?
Suppose that the animation has a much higher Resolutionals the DV material (eg, 1600x1200 px), then you put like the Final Cut Pro Project?
Is it good, Zoomfahrten on a Still Image (with stroke animation), but more in the animation program (AFX, Motion ..) or in DV editing program to make?
For me there is a similar problem as the original poster, different materials with different resolutions on a clean final DVD to get. Is really a science :-(
Another question about exporting: The Final Cut Pro Project uncompressed and then export via Compressor to the DVD format, or render directly as MPG for the DVD is the export or even no preference? I'm at maximum quality - as with most probably synonymous;)
A few tips would be nice!
Tx - Tackie
Antwort von PowerMac:
Well, such animation is done naturally in the animation program;)
In Motion is something really easy. Mostly I create the animations in HD and render it in Pro Res 422 out or sometimes directly in PAL synonymous and synonymous in Pro Res 422 (if my Mac would be lame otherwise). Pro Res 422 is almost 10-bit and uncompressed it. I turn then to a pro-Res sequence in PAL and good.
Final Cut Pro 6 can scale better than Final Cut Pro 5 If you have video material with different resolutions, then scale it in MPEG Streamclip to desired. Or hau it easy on your timeline and let Final Cut Pro (s.Version 6) do.
No, as uncompressed from Final Cut Pro to export brings nothing. Change sequence settings via your Project to Pro Res or Uncompressed. Then you need to re-render, but here you win quality, such as compositing or color correction. Then it was. You exportierst then later simply as a Quicktime movie, but not as a stand-alone film. That draw you in Compressor and then you are looking for the best settings.
Antwort von Klausinger:
Hello,
I assume that the tools used in television, Gibbs is not for ordinary consumers? Vasco da Gama seems to be quite powerful, but 150 ¬ to spend again, if I've already AFX, hmm.
Klaus.
Antwort von Markus:
... I assume that the tools used in television, Gibbs is not for ordinary consumers? In general, it fails s.zwei things: first, because how much money you spend for a piece of software is ready. Second, hardly anyone bothered to adequately incorporated to the software in the desired use. Finished animated templates, you unmotivated to the timeline can be drawn, there is usually no such programs.
