Frage von Hanssteffen:
Hi folks, can someone coincidentally a good WW-intent for the HF 10 recommendations? Because I lack a bit of tech. Background to assess what is good. In my MX500 (Panasonic), I had an original and it was very happy .... Canon offers self dei HF10 but none explicitly s.and to Still Image Mundus Noname exists for 50 euro ... there's something with better optical properties? Ich habs drauf then almost always there and it should be just what ordinary ..... Many thanks!
Antwort von Jan:
Hi,
the original wide-angle converter (of Canon recommended for the camcorder) is called the Canon WD H 37 C.
¬ 50 parts, I would consider myself very, very strong at high resolution so as Definitionscamcordern HF 10 & 100th
Raynox might look at it, lots of experience testing but it should not exist, because the camcorder is very new indeed.
Yes, sooner or later, because what will happen, 42.9 mm Focal is not rosy.
VG
Jan
Antwort von arthur:
Thank you :-) Jan, which really helps me in advance next .... I thought to bring for each series a separate converter ;-)
That would mean I may be synonymous of a synonymous Sony Take, insofar as it is a 37er is? That's one of the optical set up is quite expensive (around 150) and synonymous specified for HD .....
Antwort von mediac:
Hi,
I have recently increased the HF100, and the first thing I noticed was the lack of wide area. When browsing this forum, I had the feeling that the HD products of Raynox usable. The HD 5050Pro will cost 80 ¬ synonymous with less than half of the original Canon converter. None of you should of other experiences can, I will probably be me next week to order.
I'm new here, and the HF100 is my first own camera. However, I have some experience with professional cameras, as SonyDXC-D30/50 and prosumer 3CCD cameras.
Have a nice Sunday!
Marc
Antwort von Jan:
Yes, the HD 5050 PRO with the camera is usable, just as it is 0.3 x HD 3031 PRO, but as with the fish eye about 80 known Linienpare resolution "costs". Raynox stresses in the second converter, that it was not for the entire zoom range has been designed, but only up to about 6x, the 5050er is completely durchzoombar.
I think you should always get a user criticizes distortion and vignetting, another user said it is perfect ....
VG
Jan
Antwort von mediac:
Hi Jan,
I wanted a fisheye but then not. Since I will probably be the first, with the combination reported HD-5050Pro/HF10 *!
Ciao
Marc
Antwort von Jan:
Well, then here are some user determined looking forward to your test .....
VG
Jan
Antwort von hoschie1980:
[quote = "mediac"] Hi Jan,
I wanted a fisheye but then not. Since I will probably be the first, with the combination reported HD-5050Pro/HF10 *!
Did you get the wide angle lens and tried? I am looking for a dn the IAF did not influence ... if it exists! Hope you have found something real!
Antwort von mediac:
Hi, I have the converter is ordered for a long time, but he will probably only s.17.06. delivered. After all, the price with 65 euros in order ;-)
Antwort von hoschie1980:
Hi, I have the converter is ordered for a long time, but he will probably only s.17.06. delivered. After all, the price with 65 euros in order ;-) Already discovered what bothers you s.dem camcorder or he is almost perfect, a lot of situations already filmed? I had my three days send as a bolt in the housing has solved ... are now two weeks, I'm curious times when I wiederhabe!
Antwort von mediac:
Since this is my first camcorder is its own comparisons to the D50 and probably not appropriate, I can hardly what to say. From Features I find it great, manual settings such as focus, however, live as good as if not impossible. The Picture s.sich I like very well, with pans and I not so happy with. And the software does it so badly bad for AVCHD. With Vegas Pro Convert when I do not achieved satisfactory results.
Greeting
Marc
Antwort von mediac:
Hi, I have the converter is ordered for a long time, but he will probably only s.17.06. delivered. After all, the price with 65 euros in order ;-)
Already discovered what bothers you s.dem camcorder or he is almost perfect, a lot of situations already filmed? I had my three days send as a bolt in the housing has solved ... are now two weeks, I'm curious times when I wiederhabe! Sounds very annoying!
Have you heard the rattle bolt, or the camcorder does not work anymore?
Antwort von hoschie1980:
Sounds very annoying!
Have you heard the rattle bolt, or the camcorder is not working anymore? [/ Quote]
only a slight Klapper, thought it comes from the strap, but I wanted the screen einklappen and saw a 3mm screws between screen and housing Cam! Unfortunately, the cams are not easily as a mobile but submitted and reviewed. Annoying is the 3rd weeks tomorrow and start the photo dealer where I bought it is no feedback of Canon got! I've even synonymous with Canon called because I do not understand the ne Cam I have three days to repair must be sent! So the important question s.dich: Are you satisfied with the Cam (picture quality etc.)? I think the support of Canon is not empfehlendswert and even if you've discovered what you do not like what I would be after his rival device around! Could you test two days was actually very happy!
Antwort von mediac:
My experiences are just as outlined above. Supposedly, the competitive model of Sony Easy to use, but whether I s.dieser camera would annoy other problems, I do not know. I think here there are even Slashcam NEN test. I regret the purchase at any rate not. You have cameras at this size and price category make stop-offs ...
Greetings!
Marc
Antwort von mediac:
So, after a long wait is now finally the converter arrived! I have a series of photos of my shabby Badfliesen made to represent the distortion. I hope one or other images to help ....
Antwort von mediac:
... I have pictures of my house wall in order to better show the vignetting to be. Struck me is the fact that vignetting and distortion in 16:9 mode (synonymous movie mode) is significantly lower, because the picture in 4:3 mode is larger. I thought so far, the 4:3 mode in the width would be trimmed, but is reversed.
Many greetings
Marc
Antwort von andiblockiersystem:
Hi,
I am also for the combination of Canon HF100 + Raynox 5050 decision.
Here is more info / videos of Martin Koch:
http://canon-hf100.blogspot.com/2008/05/hf100-wide-angle-converter.html
http://canon-hf100.blogspot.com/2008/06/raynox-5050pro-with-adapter-really.html
@ Marc:
Do you have the 37/37 adapter ring used?
Is there any difference if the Resolutionder photos is 1920x1080?
My WW came yesterday - have not yet had time to test themselves ...
Regards
Andi
Antwort von mediac:
Hello Andi,
yes, I have the 37/37 adapter is used, because I am only posting your attention was that you can remove these synonymous ... I will be the difference in times of trial!
The 16:9 images, the Resolution1920 * 1080th
Greetings!
Marc
PS: nice blog! ;-)
Antwort von mediac:
Thus,
I have just 1 each again with Still Image Still Image and 1 without an adapter ring made 37/37. The converter seems mechanically with adapter ring to fit better. The vignetting is, however, with a low ring, although the section of the same. The Color performanceist differently, with the blue tiles in bad light is not really meaningful ...
Many greetings
Marc
Antwort von Brenner:
I have since yesterday my HF100.
Since I do not my old accessories Sonynext can use everything new must be purchased.
I would like to synonymous Raynox 5050PRO buy, but where s.besten?
It would be nice if there is a shop where you can still synonymous equally suitable Batteries, Charger, lens hood, etc. can be ordered.
Antwort von mediac:
I forgot my accessories at computeruniverse.net bought, the price for Lens was there very well and the shipping costs are synonymous appropriate. Surely there are better shops and this is obviously not on Still Image / Video specializes. At best, you are looking for themselves on the Internet. I've synonymous with local photo shops here want to give a chance, but were very reluctant to one customer to win (would not order or search). Good luck! Marc
Antwort von Brenner:
Thank you,
synonymous am yesterday to come precisely because the Lens to order. The rest, unfortunately, everywhere else (see
Antwort von Brenner:
Meanwhile, I have my lens, but not of computeruniverse.de but used of ebay for 45, - ¬ (incl. shipping) and all accessories.
