Frage von andi62:
My previous decision my HV 30 HDV as a new work horse in my zuzulegen is handling today's first Test s.einer HV 20 has been severely shaken!
There were things betreffenddie handling Cam, such as:
Is not good in my hand - the control buttons are too small - the so-called Zoomwippe is none - the fixed, small viewfinders is an affront - Manual Focus - Focus button and the role is what children's hands - ....
The technical values (according to tests) and the price-/Leistungsverhältnis are very good. But somehow I will be with the Cam is not warm.
Beside, the GZ-HD7E of JVC. I have ever had in my choice, but it is because of the JVC proprietary format and the relatively high price resigned.
According to the same handling first test I had the feeling - that is they have more!
If there is good and relatively hard (positive) in my hand. The focus ring, although no attack, is a revelation compared to the "rolls". The Viewfinder is extendable and has the hint of a shell. Even otherwise, the Cam a very good impression - synonymous the 3 CCD 's!
In addition, the seller (Saturn for me the piece in 1000, - ¬ would be left. Accessing or hands off?
What is your opinion about the 2's Cam? What are the practical experiences with the JVC?
Antwort von kowi:
Sorry, I'm over the letter had been logged off!
Bin mal gespannt, when the Ausloggzeit get extended. I find it very annoying - if synonymous mann long thread one always has to fly back out and lands as a "GUEST".
Antwort von Camsucher:
Hi,
I can express myself this question because only connect. Also I'm just ahead of the decision with a camcorder to the 1000 ¬ zuzulegen. Also I can not decide because, as I like in a MiniDV tape stopped. In contrast, 3 CCD is an argument or not?
Has someone experience with the JVC cam? Is the money worth?
We have seen in the night shots really 3er CCD?
Thank you for Eurere answers in advance.
Antwort von Karersee:
...
We have seen in the night shots really 3er CCD?
... Of this, I would at 1 / 5 "chips only once not out. Slashcam The test was, in fact:" ... Lowlight bad ... "
As for me s.der JVC "disturb" would be on the hard drive recording - as I would in any case prefer tape. Look at Sony's HC 9 times, which is definitely better in the hand and is somehow synonymous otherwise "high quality" than the Canon.
How is it with the JVC HDV files of? Are there problems with the popular NLEs? Or you have to be there with any "crutches" of the manufacturer's remedy?
Antwort von frv:
Hello,
I have the HD7 has a year (or 1600 ¬), a microfinance and
Tripod increased, it is fun to work with the camcorder,
I went for my needs:
How is it in your hand, quick settings, with post clips
synonymous no problems (EdiusPro).
FRV
Antwort von kowi:
.... I'm out of my needs:
How is it in your hand, quick settings clips post synonymous with no problems (EdiusPro). The moment I try in my personal camcorder-choice table synonymous. Ultimately, I have 4 HCV for Cam's "ambitious amateur filmmakers and leave" in the choice:
1. SonyFX7
2. JVC HD7
3. Canon HV30
4. SonyHC9
The FX7 is obviously a Traumcam, super technology, good handling, but for hiking, etc. too heavy and unwieldy - but it is also "slightly" over my limit of ~ 1000, - ¬.
Remain the HD7, HV30 and HC9.
Still I find the HD7 particularly her handling of the HV30 and HC9 the house set high above. However disturbs me the proprietary mpeg format but a lot. Otherwise, the price-/Leistungsverhältnis at street price of <1000, - ¬ super.
Technically the picture is the HV30 and HC9 better handling - for me an important point - but is all the worse classes.
If the HV30 in the guise of the HD7, then my decision would be clear for the HV30 (HD7), but so ..... I still have to sleep next.
Antwort von kowi:
Currently I have my personal camcorder-choice table at work. Ultimately, I have 4 HVD-Cam's for "ambitious amateur filmmakers and leave" in the choice:
1. SonyFX7
2. JVC HD7
3. Canon HV30
4. SonyHC9
The FX7 is obviously a Traumcam, super technology, good handling, but for hiking, etc. too heavy and unwieldy - but it is also "slightly" over my limit of ~ 1000, - ¬.
Remain the HD7, HV30 and HC9.
Still I find the HD7 particularly her handling of the HV30 and HC9 the house set high above. However disturbs me the proprietary mpeg format but a lot. Otherwise, the price-/Leistungsverhältnis at street price of <1000> super.
Technically the picture is the HV30 and HC9 even better, the handling - for me an important point - but it is a lot worse.
If the HV30 in the guise of the HD7, then my decision would be clear for the HV30 (HD7), but so ..... I still have to sleep next. So, now I have all 4 cams in the hands had the technical data, the advantages and disadvantages of weight and slept over.
In addition, I have the HDV clips of Wolfgang (RUSSELS) ->
Thank you for your great work, Wolfgang - In my PI S11 loaded and one HDV Testclip for Cam's: SonyHC9, Canon HV30, JVC HD7 (the SonyFX7 is from the above-mentioned reasons, unfortunately, already out of the fallen Choice).
And now: The Winner is ...... SonyHC9!
Ultimately, I have only between the HV30 and HC9 decided. Since the technology was similar, has the ultimate handling (me is better in the hand), the Viewfinder (extendable with the hint of a shell), the better picture resolution (my digicam can leave at home!) And of the Lanc port rash where. In my personal ranking, the HV30 with the HC9 score 239:229. Knapp, but nevertheless!
Now I only look after the best offer - then starts at synonymous with me finally the HD era
Antwort von PUDU:
Good and right decision - a lot of fun to film ...
Antwort von kowi:
Good and right decision - a lot of fun to film ... Thank you! :-)
