Frage von UlmsSkyliner:
Hello,
indeed possess the HV 20'm satisfied synonymous with her, not only would be a real camera with zoom and focus ring, so what better viewfinders to work, is clear.
Do not have the money to me the FX 7 to buy but inform and träuemn should I do =). Was earlier times to Wolfgang hd blog and got a few shots of the FX 7 views. If I were the GM with the 20 comparisons, I have the feeling that the HV 20 and makes better images in terms of image quality is paramount.
Can that be or I'm just mistaken?
Antwort von weitwinkel:
I think the material of hv20/30 is well with the FX7 and the s.mischen ....
the FX7 and s.haben course, their advantages in manual operation, the sound, the zoom (20x) and in weitwinkel ....
proboscis but wrote s.anderer imagine the zt. the material better HV20
looks than his a1 ... of so ...
gruß cj
Antwort von Jan:
But definitely not for weak light, the AGM has now lost 20 .....
VG
Jan
Antwort von Jogi:
I would draw the FX7. This is a genuine all-rounder and is absolutely super in the handling. At daylight of the Canon is a little Tick to ascribe more sharpness, but has the restless synonymous Picture. In LowLight the FX7 is much more synonymous as the overall picture of the FX7 harmonious effect.
Conclusion: FX7 to draw!
Antwort von UlmsSkyliner:
Was of the opinion that the FX shots of the 7 is not as good as those of the 20th AGM
Not of the sharpness, but the colors of, not force.
And lo and behold: I Hardly s.den notebook of my father, I am very satisfied with the picture quality of the FX7, here come the shots much better!
My flat screen flickers anyway and the colors are not good and strong. So it is definitely s.meinem TFT!
And because the recordings are in the Low Light of the FX 7 Many better?
And when you're in DV recording, of which camera is better because the picture quality?
Mir is the Bildqualiät s.wichtigsten with a Camera!
Is there a better camera (improving quality) than the FX7 for less than ¬ 3000?
MfG Chris
Antwort von DWUA:
Sure, search is still and always
"egg-laying wool-milk-sow" possible for almost nothing ...
There is no Jan.
There is not synonymous elsewhere.
There are good cameras, each for its own purpose.
Never
one for
all applications equally.
A simple fact.
The first is the question, what will I do, anyway?
All at once, at the same time?
Maybe the idea would be appropriate to its own claims
auszureizen not higher than the current landscape
corresponds to the above camcorder.
And what they can, is that they can not do everything, what
advertising promises.
This repulsive than Klugscheißer
;)
Antwort von rosine:
Hello,
I know the H20 does not, but since a few weeks FX7. War of days s.Gardasee in Limone, if what somebody says. I took pictures of the night in the old town not much promise when I have made on the Camera Viewfinder Display and looked in quite so good. That was when mine HC1 course not. But since I use the images on the monitor screen and saw I'm thrilled. It has so many possibilities in the field Lowlight settings to make the best picture to find that this is the hammer. Even my lady, who was not built when I bought the FX7 was overwhelmed. Minimal noise, in my opinion very good overall impression of the night scenes. I'm very spoiled and pinngelig what picture quality is concerned. But that is convincing. And even the 20x optical zoom, and the optical stabilizer in 3 stages, if you want. I would immediately buy FX7. Even if the carrying weight, so the "Nichtfilnem" somewhat difficult. But there is indeed wearing the strap. So:
Recommendation clear of me.
Antwort von DWUA:
Hello Thomas,
as "spoiled" Man this should be done
"minimal"
Noise is not simply take in the purchase.
Much better would be absolutely none!
;)
Antwort von Jan:
If you look at the FX 7 But against an VX 2100 or PD 170 post - then the HDV camera looks bad - but it is an unfair comparison - because with 3x 1 / 3 sensors with 450,000 pixels each have been pretty good at cards has Lowlight .
However, the PD 170 is at 6 DB Gain s.der already limit for professional recording, FX 7 deals in my opinion provides up to 12 DB Gain - what else but still darker than the 170th PD There is a small CMOS FX 7 pretty good.
I have the FX 7 always liked, but a Tonaussteuerung s.Gehäuse, a little more wide, and a little XLR equally at Lowlight as the Canon XH A 1 if they had brought the very top.
If you look at the test pictures in video meinst Active (HV 20 and FX 7) - I do not believe that there is true, because I already synonymous with both cameras had filmed, and the HV 20 at slightly less light and has very gerauscht the Picture synonymous was quite dark - at 1 / 50 sec. I think times are the test pictures with 1 / 25 made. The Lowlightbild the HF 10 & 100 is in my opinion, synonymous much too bright, so they Lowlightstark is not synonymous - that is not made according to the same shutter.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Jogi:
If you look at the FX 7 But against an VX 2100 or PD 170 post - then the HDV camera looks bad - but it is an unfair comparison - because with 3x 1 / 3 sensors with 450,000 pixels each have been pretty good at cards has Lowlight .
....
I have the FX 7 always liked, but a Tonaussteuerung s.Gehäuse, a little more wide, and a little XLR equally at Lowlight as the Canon XH A 1 if they had brought the very top.
VG
Jan Currently there are only 2 Cam's in the LowLight compared with a VX2100 or PD 170, as would be the EX1 and EX3.
The FX7 is but with better LowLight XLR and behavior ... SonyV1!
Antwort von Bernd E.:
FX7 ... ... ... with better LowLight behavior ... SonyV1 ... Why should the V1 in this better / different than the FX7?
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Jogi:
FX7 ... ... ... with better LowLight behavior ... SonyV1 ...
Why should the V1 in this better / different than the FX7?
Gruß Bernd E. The V1 has a HyperGain function
Antwort von rosine:
Hi DWUA,
Hello Thomas,
as "spoiled" Man this should be done
"minimal" Noise is not simply take in the purchase.
Much better would be absolutely none!
;) Na da hast du ja certainly right, but the Cam is the first where I say this is very good (Cam is meine4, of which the second HDV). Previously with the other cams, I needed not even try, there was shooting in my opinion simply no night scenes.
BTW, worrüber I was very pleasantly surprised by the purchase of the FX7 is the original Micro is very good. When I HAD Vorgängercams an external Micro drauf, for sensitive recordings I have even the most catchy of Wolfgang fetched. The FX7 I have only a windbreak, not laugh, Industrieputzlappen unused and the original Windfell of a SonyCam Micro gebastelt. With this variant had been external to the other Micros Cams equipped. Wind noise is almost removed, without a deterioration in the rest of audible frequencies. the minimum the rest of the wind noise I make the audio processing in the editing program away. Sure, you'll be a different opinion what the FX7-Micro is concerned, but I'm satisfied.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... The V1 has a HyperGain feature ... That is correct, only what with the +36 dB Picture wreak goes in the direction of "willful Vollrausch" ;-) In practice, this attitude very little: Since calling the tiny sensors simply taken its toll.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von UlmsSkyliner:
Am sure that the FX 7, the right cam for me.
On the Tonaussteuerung s.Gehäuse, I can truly renounce hauptsache a manual Tonaussteuerung menu.
And with the XLR connectors annoys me of course, but yes you can buy an adapter and a mini mixer and his future because I always turn mainly music videos, this is okay.
Accordingly, the FX7 for my purposes perfectly!
Mir is the image quality s.wichtigsten-Camera has a good image?
And whether 2500 euros a good price for the camera is?
MfG Chris
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Hi,
prefer to look after a FX1. The FX7 has compared the number of advantages, such as the much larger and wide-area a better display. The FX7 is sitting in the lot next to the rear, and the Camera You can not even reasonably take s.die shoulder. This goes for the FX1 is much better, because the display would then be just the right distance from the eye has.
On the FX1 can display the midday sun in summer synonymous fully pop out, and the picture is still fantastic.
The viewfinders of both, you can forget that when you get out of hand much like spin, but both are too heavy.
For <2500 is here in the forum I think degree of Occasion to find.
BG,
Andreas
Antwort von UlmsSkyliner:
Like I said the picture quality at a s.wichtigsten Camera.
And the FX1 is still some teething problems and have the sharpness of the camera is not very good.
Have shots with Wolfgang's blog view HD and am totally disappointed with the sharpness of the camera. Wolfgang indicates that at synonymous.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Hi,
at x-times magnification and / or in direct comparison, I will probably find in
all cameras. Native material on a 102-inch plasma can for me in any case nothing to be desired (View Case halt). Measurements are not everything, and in practice the
more balanced picture, it has all over the FX7. The Canon has even admitted fans :-)
Childhood diseases, I can not confirm if all the built in microphone, which are really not the yellow from the egg. The FX1 is otherwise exactly what I want.
Since only helps stop even try.
BG,
Andreas
Antwort von Jogi:
Like I said the picture quality at a s.wichtigsten Camera.
And the FX1 is still some teething problems and have the sharpness of the camera is not very good.
Have shots with Wolfgang's blog view HD and am totally disappointed with the sharpness of the camera. Wolfgang indicates that at synonymous. The FX1 has never had children's diseases. She was a perfect beginning Cam. The sharpness is a Very FX1, FX7 to a little better. But in direct comparison to see the pictures FX1 a lot better. Da stimmt alles ... exposure, color, behavior, Weisabgleich and steadiness. Were it otherwise would have never been this well-Sony Cam Sogut sell. As a professional version Z1 are they still there and working professionals synonymous with her. As far as relating to sharpness!
Even the sound from the built garnicht Micro is so bad. In the heights it could be a little more present. But bass range, it is an absolute tip. Since coming across as basses None other comparable Cam. The Micro FX7 is a bit of balance and more resources-and the amount present. The stereo effect is very good.
So, I would favor FX1 as No1!
Antwort von weitwinkel:
...
The viewfinders of both, you can forget that when you get out of hand much like spin, but both are too heavy.
no this is true not so ...
The FX7 has significant weight benefits vs. 1.6 kilograms. 2.2 kg
and can be awarded from the handle and through the viewfinder
film, even in about 10% of the telemedicine area hinen succeed so
still acceptable recordings.
gruß cj
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Hi,
So I just 1.6 n.halte four hours freehand high as 2.2 kilograms. With bold Battery and compulsory supplementary micro is synonymous then the FX7 still significantly heavier.
BG, Andreas
Antwort von Jogi:
...
The viewfinders of both, you can forget that when you get out of hand much like spin, but both are too heavy.
no this is true not so ...
The FX7 has significant weight benefits vs. 1.6 kilograms. 2.2 kg
and can be awarded from the handle and through the viewfinder
film, even in about 10% of the telemedicine area hinen succeed so
still acceptable recordings.
gruß cj Of course, the compact design has some advantages, which are positive, especially for the weight felt.
But mere positioning of the LCD-FX1 is perfectly situated and offers an excellent reproduction. I do not know any CAM on their display in direct sunlight or really anything with high contrast and visibility. The exellent scharfzeichnende display a non-EX1 comes with. Remember, however, was not synonymous to the very good quality of LowLight-FX1. Almost rauschreie the recordings still synonymous Color reasonable offer.
But clearly. The design of the FX7 ansich and is Very convenient. I wish me a cam of this size with the qualities of an EX1.
