Frage von nerdygörl:
hallo ihr ieben,
I need an opinion. as a student in the field moving, I will work with the hdmaterial and it is not dull burn.
including cut and postproduktion.
and no-sony do I clean out of the front!
should I
hv to buy the
20 (super toller 24fp mode, cinema-look, top lowlight and HDV)
or
the
SX5 (3CCD, dvd & sh-card, AVCHD)
Both cameras have a viewfinder!
in the canon really bothers me that they do not have 3-chip camera is. or bilde ich mir da quality, which did not bring so much more?
desweieteren now I've read often enough that the SX5 even nciht Full HD recording, but basically synonymous only 1440x1080 (chip size).
my pc (dual core 2.4 GHz, 2 gb ram) is just (although not smooth) the AVCHD files to play. the premiere plugin I've ever tested - go!
I've thought, I compress and then cut into premiere. only questionable whether I will ever work with AVCHD must / should.
I make an error without 3CCD? I guess wrong?
help!
Antwort von Meggs:
desweieteren now I've read often enough that the SX5 even nciht Full HD recording, but basically synonymous only 1440x1080 (chip size).
The pixels of Panasonic strategy is a mystery to me. The SD-Pal models have 3 x 1,070,000 pixels to be down Pal (GS 500), the HD models come with 3 x 520,000 pixels Resolutionauf only half of the chip, and will be on Full HD 1920 x 1080 and high hochinterpoliert stored as compressed AVCHD (SX5).
I would prefer the HV20. In all tests, it is an excellent Picture certifies HDV can be better referred to edit and archive and cheaper than AVCHD, it is still synonymous.
Antwort von nerdygörl:
monetary order, it is not ;-)
(naja..)
is the "image" in the SX5 perhaps better overall? all around me to swear it on 3 ccd.
because I would go through the AVCHD quite synonymous. I wil hold the best possible rausholen.
Antwort von Meggs:
Video Aktiv Digital, for example, both models tested:
http://www.videoaktiv.de//images/bestenliste/bestenliste.pdf
which cuts the HV20 better.
Antwort von Meggs:
3CCD is theoretically better than 1 CCD, but only one of many important factors. Panasonic has is the Pal area in the lower and middle segment 3CCD camcorder, which so many of your camcorder 1CCD another manufacturer be exceeded.
Full HD recording is theoretically better and more detailed than the anamorphic 1080 x 1440th But only if the recorded signal is synonymous better and richer detail. That I dare to doubt the specific case.
Panasonic focuses on features that are effective advertising buy.
3CCD and FullHD sounds good. 3 years ago, when the Pixelwahn with Pal camcorders broke out, put them on as many pixels on mini-chips.
Antwort von nerdygörl:
Thank you. Now this has me a little place next. :)
Antwort von RupertGr8:
The HV20 does not CCD but a CMOS chip. A CMOS can be better than 3 CCD. All relevant tests certify the HV20 a better picture quality than the SX5.
Antwort von Videophreak:
and no-sony do I clean out of the front!
Why?
should I
hv to buy the 20 (super toller 24fp mode, cinema-look, top lowlight and HDV)
or SX5 (3CCD, dvd & sh-card, AVCHD)
The 24-frame mode is informed as far as I'm not a true 24-frame mode. And more a algorhythm in the handling of original material intervenes, the more loss you will have to accept. Why for you the qualities of a Lowlight-Cam are important to me is just for you, this industry where you will learn by studying, somehow not. Because lighting is synonymous but a large part of this study, or not? HDV is my opinion of AVCHD replaced soon. It's just a matter of time before powerful calculator with the H.264 bitstream cope.
I myself have a 3CCD camera and a 1cmos home. Among the colors are there sufficient lighting condition, hardly any difference. As it stands with the sharpness, I can not say exactly, because to me the services of other devices are not known. However, it is synonymous my 3CCD sharper than the 1cmos. And both are less than SD cams, where the question of sharpness is not so significant falls, as with high-resolution devices.
In general but for each camera, no preference whether SD or HD, that the interplay of all components (chip, chip size, Lens, light, etc. ..) each to contribute his part, which affects the overall quality.
Lg
Markus
Antwort von Videophreak:
The HV20 does not CCD but a CMOS chip. A CMOS can be better than 3 CCD. Yes, as long as there is enough light there. My experiences show that a CMOS in low light to very quickly become weak start.
Lg
Markus
