Frage von Fips77:
Hello,
Connections to the two models should be absolutely identical with regard to image quality, or?
I'm just confused because of an article in the April / May issue of the magazine "Video Aktiv Digital". As stands regarding Picture and Sound:
"At the sibling model, the A1 tester were the unbalanced panel criticized the vote, to bright image parts überstrahlt happy. The better coordinated professional model which is not much left" What say you about this?
From the editorial, unfortunately, comes no answer.
Regards,
Stefan
Antwort von AndyZZ:
Since one of the XH-A1 XH-G1 and probably a million parameters can be set manual, I can imagine that the presets of the XH-G1 otherwise default. The presets of the XH-A1 in the delivery status will probably be rather bad. In any newspaper I have a whole range of parameters for the optimum setting list view.
Antwort von JMitch:
In any newspaper I have a whole range of parameters for the optimum setting list view. Do you by chance nor the newspaper could it be?
I would be interested.
Many greetings
Moritz
Antwort von JMitch:
I would be interested synonymous! :-)
a little fine-tuning is certainly good, but I think you should most of the parameters in any finger can
Stefan
Antwort von Axel:
Here here (subject: storage and exchange of A1 presets).
Antwort von r.p. television:
I (half)-knowledge that there are differences between the two cameras in the Picture.
The technicians have in the G1 well, the aperture is a half automatic aperture correction stage. But without a guarantee.
The custom presets, though with caution, but still very useful. You just have to make sure that you are not in the wrong direction "screwed" and that only in a subjective look beautiful love.
I like it as much farbgesättigt with Stretch Black, red and cyan matrix slightly.
For some purposes, it is then recommended other custom presets to choose.
PS:
There were minimal differences in synonymous factory setting between the FX1 and Z1. Also the course of production are probably slight amendments.
Antwort von Axel:
The technicians have in the G1 well, the aperture is a half automatic aperture correction stage. But without a guarantee.
Then probably down. In fully automatic mode, I find everything in daylight too bright
The custom presets, though with caution, but still very useful. You just have to make sure that you are not in the wrong direction "screwed" and that only in a subjective look beautiful love.
Therefore, firstly, the editable presets at any time and, secondly, of the card in any amount to load. A fine thing, but who are reluctant through endless sub-menus is clicked, it may already be slightly annoyed. What do you want? Each look is possible. What else offers the Consumercam to this extent? I know what you want: That the camera can read minds.
For some purposes, it is then recommended other custom presets to choose.
I am experimenting fun. Definitely not a hater Camera for technology and automatic film.
Antwort von r.p.television:
@ axel:
Yes. The automatic shutter was down regulated. Other way around would have been synonymous stupid. But do not know whether that's true. Do it my video of Vertriebler belongs. Synonymous would make sense because the A1 just like the XL H1 in certain situations, like a tendency to over-exposure. But you can indeed be synonymous with AE -0.5 help. The custom presets are a great thing and I have been working my XL H1 had no second with the factory setting. I've synonymous six different presets depending on the requirement and motive to use. However, I have been on Colormatching sometimes into too much red or too colorful daring. Also sometimes rather underexposed. Because activated Peaking (with me always) does the Picture paler, brighter and farbentsättigter than real. So from time to time the peaking times briefly turn off and check the color saturation. Compared, however, pale in contrast with the poor work attitude, these missteps still better. Be to me as a backup synonymous get A1. Only because of the improved automatic iris, the G1 is the extra cost not worth it, because yes yes this maladministration with a handle can correct.
Antwort von Fips77:
Good morning!
Yesterday, nor the response of the "Active Video" Editorial get that I do not deprive you of course want to:
"(...) The G1 more expensive model for the professional sector used synonymous harder selected components, and because the camera was later extradited, the manufacturer had more time to fine-tuning to be optimized.
Furthermore, I can only talk about our test model, which features the aforementioned components. Whether currently ausgelieferte A1 devices because of our criticism "trimmed" picture setting possess eludes my knowledge. "
Regards,
Stefan
Antwort von HeikoS:
So with the the selected components will be given every time when a "professional version" irgednwo out at the end. That was all PD-XXX camcorders so .... because I do not galube bit. What would be synonymous for an expense? Then it is likely that it is simply scattering series, or, as so synonymous have written a different (better) vote.
Antwort von r.p.television:
The statement with selected components, I can not understand.
Does this statement by the Manufacturer?
The series is spreading, there is undisputed, but:
Manufacturer as I would never make such a statement because it would indirectly yes, I admit that my components in the manufacturing tolerances which significant ....
